Surface-Modified Piezoelectric Copolymer Poly(vinylidene fluoride–trifluoroethylene) Supporting Physiological Extracellular Matrixes to Enhance Mesenchymal Stem Cell Adhesion for Nanoscale Mechanical Stimulation
Source abstract
Abstract
There is an unmet clinical need to provide viable bone grafts for clinical use. Autologous bone, one of the most commonly transplanted tissues, is often used but is associated with donor site morbidity. Tissue engineering strategies to differentiate an autologous cell source, such as mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), into a potential bone-graft material could help to fulfill clinical demand. However, osteogenesis of MSCs can typically require long culture periods that are impractical in a clinical setting and can lead to significant cost. Investigation into strategies that optimize cell production is essential. Here, we use the piezoelectric copolymer poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) (PVDF-TrFE), functionalized with a poly(ethyl acrylate) (PEA) coating that drives fibronectin network formation, to enhance MSC adhesion and to present growth factors in the solid phase. Dynamic electrical cues are then incorporated, via a nanovibrational bioreactor, and the MSC response to electromechanical stimulation is investigated.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Bone fractures and treatments · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for the Cellular Microenvironment, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom
Centre for Research in Medical Devices (CÚRAM), National University of Ireland Galway, Galway H91W2TY, Ireland
SUPA Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1QE, United Kingdom
Funding
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.00110.1016/j.injury.2011.06.001 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.04310.1016/j.injury.2021.01.043 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.01510.1016/j.injury.2011.06.015 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0020-1383(08)70003-210.1016/S0020-1383(08)70003-2 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.mattod.2015.10.00810.1016/j.mattod.2015.10.008 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cobme.2022.10039810.1016/j.cobme.2022.100398 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.08.05510.1016/j.jconrel.2021.08.055 ↗
8. 10.21037/aoj.2016.11.0210.21037/aoj.2016.11.02 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.08.04310.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.08.043 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20200878810.1002/adma.202008788 ↗
11. Yasuda I. · J. Bone Jt. Surg. · 1955 · 37 · 1292
12. 10.1043/0003-3219(1994)064<0175:WLABSA>2.0.CO;210.1043/0003-3219(1994)064<0175:WLABSA>2.0.CO;2 ↗
13. 10.1088/1748-6041/7/3/03500410.1088/1748-6041/7/3/035004 ↗
14. 10.1038/nprot.2017.15710.1038/nprot.2017.157 ↗
15. 10.1039/C4TB00355A10.1039/C4TB00355A ↗
16. 10.1039/C5TB00714C10.1039/C5TB00714C ↗
17. 10.3389/fchem.2019.0036410.3389/fchem.2019.00364 ↗
18. 10.1126/science.137.3535.106310.1126/science.137.3535.1063 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41551-017-0127-410.1038/s41551-017-0127-4 ↗
20. 10.1021/nn400202j10.1021/nn400202j ↗
21. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0313010.1021/acsnano.0c03130 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.msec.2020.11096610.1016/j.msec.2020.110966 ↗
23. 10.1126/science.817132010.1126/science.8171320 ↗
24. 10.1126/sciadv.160018810.1126/sciadv.1600188 ↗
25. 10.1002/advs.20180036110.1002/advs.201800361 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.02.02410.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.02.024 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.10036710.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100367 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41598-019-49422-410.1038/s41598-019-49422-4 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.21337010.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213370 ↗
30. 10.1101/2022.07.28.50181810.1101/2022.07.28.501818 ↗
31. 10.1002/adhm.20180146910.1002/adhm.201801469 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jmat.2022.08.00410.1016/j.jmat.2022.08.004 ↗
33. 10.1002/adts.20190016910.1002/adts.201900169 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.01.00910.1016/j.jsb.2010.01.009 ↗
35. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.9110.1038/natrevmats.2017.91 ↗