Improving the Activity of DNA-Encoded Sensing Elements through Confinement in Silk Microcapsules
Source abstract
Abstract
Assembling synthetic bioparts into simplified artificial cells holds tremendous promise for advancing studies into the synthesis, biosensing, and delivery of biomolecules. Currently, the most successful techniques for encapsulation of the transcription–translation machinery exploit compartmentalization in liposomal vesicles. However, improvements to these methods may increase permeability to polar molecules, functionalization of the membrane with biologically active elements, and encapsulation efficiency. Microcapsules prepared via templated layer-by-layer (LbL) assembly using natural polymers have the potential to resolve some of the hurdles associated with liposomes. Here, we introduce a design for immobilizing DNA templates encoding translationally activated riboswitches and RNA aptamers into microcapsules prepared from regenerated silk fibroin protein. Adjusting several key parameters such as the presence of a polymer primer, concentration of silk protein, and DNA loadings during LbL assembly resulted in biocompatible, semipermeable, DNA-laden microcapsules. To preserve bioactivity, DNA was immobilized inside of the capsule membrane, which not only promoted stability during long-term storage at ambient conditions but also improved output response from spatially confined DNA-encoded sensing elements (SEs). Multiple copies of mRNA and GFPa1 protein were synthesized upon activation with specific analytes during in vitro transcription/translation reactions, demonstrating that selective permeability of silk microcapsules was essential for the diffusion of components of the cell-free system inside of the capsules. Further functionalization of capsule shells with gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and antibodies (IgG) demonstrated the applicability of microcompartmentalized colloidal objects carrying SEs for remote sensing and/or targeted delivery. In the future, multifunctional, biocompatible silk-based microcapsules loaded with different RNA sensors can help advance the design of multiplexed biosensors tracking multiple biomarkers in complex media.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silk-based biomaterials and applications · RNA Interference and Gene Delivery · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
UES Inc., Dayton, Ohio 45432, United States
711th Human Performance Wing, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Dayton, Ohio 45433, United States
Materials and Manufacturing Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Dayton, Ohio 45433, United States
Funding
Air Force Office of Scientific Research · U.S. Department of Defense
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.00710.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.007 ↗
2. 10.1089/dna.2013.205610.1089/dna.2013.2056 ↗
3. 10.1021/ar700233610.1021/ar7002336 ↗
4. 10.1038/micronano.2016.6210.1038/micronano.2016.62 ↗
5. 10.1038/ncomms501210.1038/ncomms5012 ↗
6. 10.1021/ac061471s10.1021/ac061471s ↗
7. 10.1002/cbic.20130044910.1002/cbic.201300449 ↗
8. 10.1038/nchem.264410.1038/nchem.2644 ↗
9. 10.1039/C6CC00223D10.1039/C6CC00223D ↗
10. 10.1038/s41467-018-07473-710.1038/s41467-018-07473-7 ↗
11. 10.1080/17425247.2017.128527910.1080/17425247.2017.1285279 ↗
12. 10.1021/nn700063w10.1021/nn700063w ↗
13. 10.1039/c1cc13453a10.1039/c1cc13453a ↗
14. 10.3390/polym1012134210.3390/polym10121342 ↗
15. 10.1098/rsif.2014.045910.1098/rsif.2014.0459 ↗
16. 10.1002/anie.20060277910.1002/anie.200602779 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.cis.2013.10.01210.1016/j.cis.2013.10.012 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.06210.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.062 ↗
19. 10.1002/advs.20140000710.1002/advs.201400007 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.8b0429410.1021/acsami.8b04294 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.08.00210.1016/j.jconrel.2013.08.002 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20090341110.1002/adma.200903411 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.nano.2017.09.00110.1016/j.nano.2017.09.001 ↗
24. 10.1002/adfm.20080038810.1002/adfm.200800388 ↗
25. 10.1021/ja052716610.1021/ja0527166 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.addr.2011.03.01610.1016/j.addr.2011.03.016 ↗
27. 10.1039/C6CS00632A10.1039/C6CS00632A ↗
28. 10.4269/ajtmh.15-011010.4269/ajtmh.15-0110 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsabm.9b0020310.1021/acsabm.9b00203 ↗
30. 10.1039/c2cs35094g10.1039/c2cs35094g ↗
31. 10.1039/C5TB00615E10.1039/C5TB00615E ↗
32. 10.1002/smll.20190488010.1002/smll.201904880 ↗
33. 10.2147/DDDT.S16544010.2147/DDDT.S165440 ↗
34. 10.1073/pnas.090853110710.1073/pnas.0908531107 ↗
35. 10.1039/C8CS00187A10.1039/C8CS00187A ↗
36. 10.3390/ijms1803023710.3390/ijms18030237 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b0020710.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00207 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.09.03710.1016/j.jconrel.2015.09.037 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.05.05910.1016/j.jconrel.2014.05.059 ↗
40. 10.1002/bip.2202610.1002/bip.22026 ↗
41. 10.1021/nl302810c10.1021/nl302810c ↗
42. 10.1039/b905802h10.1039/b905802h ↗
43. 10.1002/adma.20110223410.1002/adma.201102234 ↗
44. 10.1021/acssynbio.6b0019910.1021/acssynbio.6b00199 ↗
45. 10.1021/mz200118f10.1021/mz200118f ↗
46. 10.1038/nsmb.231310.1038/nsmb.2313 ↗
47. 10.1038/s41598-018-25532-310.1038/s41598-018-25532-3 ↗
48. 10.1093/nar/gkv32910.1093/nar/gkv329 ↗
49. 10.1371/journal.pone.002870710.1371/journal.pone.0028707 ↗
50. 10.1073/pnas.122232111010.1073/pnas.1222321110 ↗
51. 10.3390/ijms1901004410.3390/ijms19010044 ↗
52. 10.1038/s41467-020-14932-710.1038/s41467-020-14932-7 ↗
53. 10.1021/bm401414910.1021/bm4014149 ↗
54. 10.1021/cm900073t10.1021/cm900073t ↗
55. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.03910.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.039 ↗