journal article·2020-06-17

“Shape-Coding”: Morphology-Based Information System for Polymers and Composites

Amol V. Pansare, Shraddha Y. Chhatre, Shyam R. Khairkar, Jeffrey G. Bell, Michel Barbezat, Subhananda Chakrabarti, Amit A. Nagarkar

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 12· Issue 24
Publisher page

Abstract

Fiber-reinforced composites have become the material of choice for aerospace structures because of their favorable strength-to-weight ratio. Given the increasing amounts of counterfeit composite parts showing up in the complex aerospace supply chain, it is absolutely vital to track a composite part throughout its lifecycle-from production to usage and to disposal. Existing barcoding methods are invasive, affect the structural properties of composites, and/or are vulnerable to tampering. We describe a universal method to store information in fiber-reinforced composites based on solid-state in situ reduction leading to embedded nanoparticles with controlled morphologies. This simple, cost-effective, mild, surfactant-free, and one-step protocol for the fabrication of embedded platinum nanostructures leads to morphology-based barcodes for polymeric composites. We also describe a coding methodology wherein a 1 × 1 cm code can represent 3.4 billion parts to 95 trillion parts, depending on the resolution required along with access to morphology-based chemical encryption systems.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Mechanical Systems Engineering, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology-Empa, Dübendorf 8600, Switzerland

National Chemical Laboratory (NCL), Dr. Homi Bhabha Road, Pune 411008, India

Research and Services Division of Materials Data and Integrated System (MaDIS), National Institute for MaterialsScience, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0047, Japan

Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, 12 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, United States

Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400076, India

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur F?rderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung · National Centre of Excellence in Technologies for Internal Security, IIT Bombay

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/admt.20180027110.1002/admt.201800271 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.00410.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.004 ↗
3. Koepsel, K. M. Counterfeit Parts and Their Impact on the Supply Chain, 2nd ed. T-136; SAE International, 2018; p 194.10.4271/0768093880 ↗
4. National Research Council · 2012
5. A Special Report, Counterfeit Parts: Increasing Awareness and Developing Countermeasures; Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc., 2011, http://www.aia-aerospace.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/counterfeit-web11.pdf.
6. Zweben C. · 2015
7. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.10.03510.1016/j.polymer.2017.10.035 ↗
8. 10.3390/ma306346810.3390/ma3063468 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20150524510.1002/adma.201505245 ↗
10. 10.1002/adfm.20160205610.1002/adfm.201602056 ↗
11. 10.1038/srep3476110.1038/srep34761 ↗
12. Fox, M.; Schultheisz, C.; Reeder, J. Fractographic Examination of the Vertical Stabilizer and Rudder from American Airlines Flight 587. 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials and Co-located Conferences, 2005.10.2514/6.2005-2252 ↗
13. 10.1021/am800199u10.1021/am800199u ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20180152310.1002/adma.201801523 ↗
15. 10.1038/srep1645610.1038/srep16456 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.03.01710.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.03.017 ↗
17. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b0094910.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00949 ↗
18. 10.1002/app.2099010.1002/app.20990 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.08.01510.1016/j.compositesb.2016.08.015 ↗
20. Bauchot, F.; Clement, J.Y.; Marmigere, G.; Secondo, P. Chipless RFID Tag and Method for Communicating with the RFID Tag. U.S. Patent 8,068,010 B2, 2011.
21. Burkholder, R. J.; Kiourti, A.; Shao, S.; Volakis, J. L. RFID Tag. U.S. Patent D763,833 S1, 2016.
22. 10.1038/ncomms964310.1038/ncomms9643 ↗
23. Herbert, W. G.; Maier, G. J. Magnetic Ink Composition, Magnetic Ink Character Recognition Process, and Magnetically Readable Structures. EP2390292 B1, 2013.
24. 10.1016/j.addma.2016.10.00210.1016/j.addma.2016.10.002 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.6b1321810.1021/acsami.6b13218 ↗
26. 10.1039/c1jm11125f10.1039/c1jm11125f ↗
27. 10.1126/science.123814910.1126/science.1238149 ↗
28. 10.1126/science.aat980410.1126/science.aat9804 ↗
29. 10.1038/nchem.53010.1038/nchem.530 ↗
30. Liang M. B. · 2015
31. 10.1002/adma.20190180210.1002/adma.201901802 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.02.06210.1016/j.polymer.2018.02.062 ↗
33. 10.1039/c4sc02242d10.1039/c4sc02242d ↗
34. 10.1039/c6cy01709f10.1039/c6cy01709f ↗
35. 10.1039/c5nr01575h10.1039/c5nr01575h ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0924110.1021/acs.jpcc.6b09241 ↗
37. 10.1126/science.124302210.1126/science.1243022 ↗
38. 10.1038/nature2597110.1038/nature25971 ↗
39. 10.1021/cm960119010.1021/cm9601190 ↗
40. Sau T. K. · 2010
41. 10.1039/b925996a10.1039/b925996a ↗
42. 10.1039/c7cc01121k10.1039/c7cc01121k ↗
43. 10.1038/ncomms811010.1038/ncomms8110 ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0005610.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00056 ↗
45. 10.1021/cm801356a10.1021/cm801356a ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2019.04.01410.1016/j.jlumin.2019.04.014 ↗
47. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0604410.1021/acsnano.6b06044 ↗
48. 10.1038/nature1031310.1038/nature10313 ↗
49. 10.1021/nl303877310.1021/nl3038773 ↗
50. 10.1016/s1369-7021(02)01138-010.1016/s1369-7021(02)01138-0 ↗
51. Masuda T. · Hitachi Rev. · 2016 · 65 · 168
52. Koch K. J. · Adv. Mater. Process. · 2011 · 15 · 169