Stretchable Clay Nanocomposite Barrier Film for Flexible Packaging
Source abstract
Abstract
The goal of reconciling all packaging requirements, e.g., mechanical resistance, transparency, flexibility, and gas barrier properties, is immensely challenging for packaging materials. Particularly, the combination of flexibility and good gas barrier properties poses a serious problem, especially when barrier requirements can only be met by lamination with a metal foil, metalization, or vapor-deposited ceramic layers, as all of these tend to be nonstretchable. In this work, we produced a stretchable nanocomposite barrier composed of one-dimensional (1D) crystalline (Bragg stack) barrier films composed of alternating layers of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and synthetic sodium fluorohectorite (Hec) nanosheets. By sandwiching the Bragg stack type film between two plasticized poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVOH) layers, a waterborne laminate was obtained that outperforms commercial polymer materials in terms of water vapor permeability (WVP = 2.8 g mm m –2 day –1 bar –1 at 23 °C and 85% relative humidity), which is remarkable for an entirely water-soluble film. Moreover, no deterioration of barrier performance up to 10% elongation was observed, rendering the transparent self-standing laminate promising for thermoformed blister packaging, shrink wrap, or vacuum packaging. Besides the low WVP, the scalable and green processing method makes this technology auspicious for real-world applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Bavarian Polymer Institute and Department of Chemistry, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth 95447, Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Plastics - the Facts 2021: An Analysis of European Latest Plastics Production, Demand and Waste Data PlasticsEurope: Brussels, Belgium; 2021.
2. 10.1002/pts.62110.1002/pts.621 ↗
3. 10.1007/s12393-020-09235-y10.1007/s12393-020-09235-y ↗
4. 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.04.01810.1016/j.tsf.2010.04.018 ↗
5. 10.2478/plua-2013-001110.2478/plua-2013-0011 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.10139510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.101395 ↗
7. 10.3390/plasma504003310.3390/plasma5040033 ↗
8. Pilchik R. · Pharm. Technol. · 2000 · 56
9. 10.1007/s13197-011-0284-510.1007/s13197-011-0284-5 ↗
10. Müller, D.; Bonten, C. In Investigation on the Processability of Sheets for Thermoforming, Fracture and Damage Mechanics: Theory, Simulation and Experiment; AIP Publishing, 2020; p 020040.10.1063/5.0028733 ↗
11. 10.1080/2374068X.2020.173434810.1080/2374068X.2020.1734348 ↗
12. 10.1002/pen.2058810.1002/pen.20588 ↗
13. 10.1300/J105v18n01_1010.1300/J105v18n01_10 ↗
14. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.18810.1038/nphoton.2013.188 ↗
15. Martin P. J. · 2009 · 35210.1533/9781845696429.3.352 ↗
16. 10.1002/pen.2005410.1002/pen.20054 ↗
17. 10.4103/0975-7406.11182010.4103/0975-7406.111820 ↗
18. Lacroix M. · 2009 · 34710.1007/978-0-387-92824-1_13 ↗
19. Throne J. · 2011 · 33310.1016/B978-1-4377-3514-7.10019-4 ↗
20. 10.1002/tcr.20170008510.1002/tcr.201700085 ↗
21. Umemura Y. · 2018 · 9 · 377
22. 10.1016/j.clay.2022.10648710.1016/j.clay.2022.106487 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c0281810.1021/acs.macromol.0c02818 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsanm.2c0006110.1021/acsanm.2c00061 ↗
25. 10.1002/anie.20191154610.1002/anie.201911546 ↗
26. 10.1126/sciadv.170121210.1126/sciadv.1701212 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.1c1424610.1021/acsami.1c14246 ↗
28. 10.3389/fnut.2022.79015710.3389/fnut.2022.790157 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsapm.0c0045610.1021/acsapm.0c00456 ↗
30. 10.1002/adma.20180247710.1002/adma.201802477 ↗
31. 10.1002/mame.20210072710.1002/mame.202100727 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b0107710.1021/acs.iecr.8b01077 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)80877-710.1016/S0376-7388(00)80877-7 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.memsci.2004.12.02510.1016/j.memsci.2004.12.025 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matlet.2008.06.01210.1016/j.matlet.2008.06.012 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.01.02410.1016/j.compscitech.2011.01.024 ↗
37. 10.1179/174328908X8341010.1179/174328908X83410 ↗
38. 10.1002/admt.20220055310.1002/admt.202200553 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0220610.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02206 ↗
40. 10.1021/la304453h10.1021/la304453h ↗
41. 10.3402/nano.v6.2566110.3402/nano.v6.25661 ↗
42. Moore D. M. · 1989 · 322
43. 10.1007/s11998-021-00535-410.1007/s11998-021-00535-4 ↗
44. 10.1116/1.501179010.1116/1.5011790 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.12.06410.1016/j.apsusc.2010.12.064 ↗
46. 10.1088/0022-3727/43/17/17530110.1088/0022-3727/43/17/175301 ↗
47. 10.1021/acsami.1c0389510.1021/acsami.1c03895 ↗
48. 10.1002/marc.20140010410.1002/marc.201400104 ↗
49. 10.1021/acsami.7b0084410.1021/acsami.7b00844 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.05110.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.051 ↗
51. 10.1016/0011-9164(87)87030-310.1016/0011-9164(87)87030-3 ↗
52. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0163310.1021/acsnano.0c01633 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.clay.2009.11.01410.1016/j.clay.2009.11.014 ↗