Highly Transparent Polycrystalline MgO via Spark Plasma Sintering
Source abstract
Abstract
Optically transparent ceramics and MgO in particular are promising materials for a wide range of optical applications. This study introduces exceptionally highly transparent MgO ceramics produced via spark plasma sintering (SPS) at relatively low temperature and pressure by optimal incorporation of LiF as a sintering additive. The effect of LiF content on the microstructural and optical properties is presented with emphasis on its function as a densification aid and an agent for minimizing residual carbon contamination. Fully dense MgO discs, 20 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick, with ∼80% in-line transmission at 800 nm and >85% transmission in the infrared range (2-6 μm), are attained. These results demonstrate outstanding transparency in SPS polycrystalline MgO in the 800 nm range, only 7% below the theoretical value. In addition, this work strengthens our understanding of the LiF action mechanism during MgO sintering and its influence on texture development in the SPS-pressing direction. These findings pave the way for fabrication of large, fully dense samples with nearly theoretical transparency.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Microwave Dielectric Ceramics Synthesis · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The Wolfson Department of Chemical Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa3200003, Israel
RAFAEL, P.O.Box 2250, Haifa3102102, Israel
The Nancy & Stephan Grand Technion Energy Program (GTEP), Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa3200003, Israel
Funding
Nancy and Stephen Grand Technion Energy Program · PAZY Foundation · Arturo Gruenbaum Chair in Materials Engineering
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2012.12.00210.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2012.12.002 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.mser.2019.10051810.1016/j.mser.2019.100518 ↗
3. Harris D. C. · 1999 · 15810.1117/3.349896 ↗
4. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.298575010.1109/ACCESS.2020.2985750 ↗
5. 10.3139/ijmr-2003-004010.3139/ijmr-2003-0040 ↗
6. 10.1111/jace.1713610.1111/jace.17136 ↗
7. 10.1557/JMR.2004.033410.1557/JMR.2004.0334 ↗
8. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05103.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05103.x ↗
9. 10.1111/jace.1726710.1111/jace.17267 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.06.02110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.06.021 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.10.02210.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.10.022 ↗
12. Suarez M. · 2013
13. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04210.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04210.x ↗
14. 10.1016/s0584-8539(87)80050-810.1016/s0584-8539(87)80050-8 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.02.00110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.02.001 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.10.03510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.10.035 ↗
17. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03108.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03108.x ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.08.00610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.08.006 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.08.11910.1016/j.ceramint.2017.08.119 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.09.00510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.09.005 ↗
21. 10.1016/0025-5408(67)90135-310.1016/0025-5408(67)90135-3 ↗
22. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05413.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05413.x ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.cgd.5b0156410.1021/acs.cgd.5b01564 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.04.14810.1016/j.jallcom.2014.04.148 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.msea.2005.07.02410.1016/j.msea.2005.07.024 ↗
26. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1965.tb14695.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1965.tb14695.x ↗
27. Spriggs R. M. · 1970 · 5 · 18310.1016/B978-0-12-053303-9.50012-5 ↗
28. 10.6028/jres.049.02510.6028/jres.049.025 ↗