journal article·2021-06-23

Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) Plasma Coating of Sulfur for Mitigation of Capacity Fade in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Ahmed Shafique, Vijay Shankar Rangasamy, Annick Vanhulsel, Mohammadhosein Safari, Silvia Gross, Peter Adriaensens, Marlies K. Van Bael, An Hardy, Sébastien Sallard

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 13· Issue 24
Publisher page

Abstract

Sulfur particles with a conductive polymer coating of poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene) “PEDOT” were prepared by dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma technology under atmospheric conditions (low temperature, ambient pressure). We report a solvent-free, low-cost, low-energy-consumption, safe, and low-risk process to make the material development and production compatible for sustainable technologies. Different coating protocols were developed to produce PEDOT-coated sulfur powders with electrical conductivity in the range of 10–8–10–5 S/cm. The raw sulfur powder (used as the reference) and (low-, optimum-, high-) PEDOT-coated sulfur powders were used to assemble lithium–sulfur (Li–S) cells with a high sulfur loading of ∼4.5 mg/cm2. Long-term galvanostatic cycling at C/10 for 100 cycles showed that the capacity fade was mitigated by ∼30% for the cells containing the optimum-PEDOT-coated sulfur in comparison to the reference Li–S cells with raw sulfur. Rate capability, cyclic voltammetry, and electrochemical impedance analyzes confirmed the improved behavior of the PEDOT-coated sulfur as an active material for lithium–sulfur batteries. The Li–S cells containing optimum-PEDOT-coated sulfur showed the highest reproducibility of their electrochemical properties. A wide variety of bulk and surface characterization methods including conductivity analysis, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and NMR spectroscopy were used to explain the chemical features and the superior behavior of Li–S cells using the optimum-PEDOT-coated sulfur material. Moreover, postmortem [SEM and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET)] analyzes of uncoated and coated samples allowed us to exclude any significant effect at the electrode scale even after 70 cycles.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Sustainable Materials, VITO (Flemish Institute for Technological Research), Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium

Institute for Materials Research (imo-imomec), Hasselt University, Martelarenlaan 42, B 3500 Hasselt, Belgium

Energyville, Thor Park 8320, B-3600 Genk, Belgium

Imec vzw, div. imomec, Wetenschapspark 1, B 2590 Diepenbeek, Belgium

Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Padua, via Marzolo, 1, 35131 Padova, PD, Italy

References (81)

Show source-provided references
1. Dudley, B. In BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2014, World Petroleum Conference, Moscow, 2014.
2. 10.3390/inorganics201013210.3390/inorganics2010132 ↗
3. 10.1142/9789814317665_002410.1142/9789814317665_0024 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0059410.1021/acsenergylett.6b00594 ↗
5. 10.1039/c5ta00361j10.1039/c5ta00361j ↗
6. 10.1021/cr500207g10.1021/cr500207g ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.01010.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.010 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.05110.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.051 ↗
9. 10.1002/aesr.20200010210.1002/aesr.202000102 ↗
10. IBM Research is reshaping the scene of sustainable batteries. https://www.ibm.com/blogs/nordic-msp/ibm-research-reshaping-scene-of-sustainable-batteries/ (accessed Apr 26, 2021).
11. Start—Battery 2030. https://battery2030.eu/ (accessed Apr 26, 2021).
12. 10.1002/anie.20130476210.1002/anie.201304762 ↗
13. 10.1002/aenm.20170026010.1002/aenm.201700260 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20160682310.1002/adma.201606823 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.gee.2017.08.00210.1016/j.gee.2017.08.002 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.05.02310.1016/j.ensm.2020.05.023 ↗
17. 10.1038/nmat246010.1038/nmat2460 ↗
18. 10.1166/jnn.2018.1545310.1166/jnn.2018.15453 ↗
19. 10.1002/chem.20140443910.1002/chem.201404439 ↗
20. 10.1021/nl200658a10.1021/nl200658a ↗
21. 10.1021/nn401228t10.1021/nn401228t ↗
22. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.08110.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.081 ↗
23. 10.1007/s41918-019-00048-010.1007/s41918-019-00048-0 ↗
24. 10.3390/en512519010.3390/en5125190 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.07.06710.1016/j.electacta.2013.07.067 ↗
26. 10.1021/nl403130h10.1021/nl403130h ↗
27. 10.1039/c3nr01393f10.1039/c3nr01393f ↗
28. 10.1021/nl400543y10.1021/nl400543y ↗
29. 10.1021/ar300094m10.1021/ar300094m ↗
30. 10.1021/ja308170k10.1021/ja308170k ↗
31. 10.1007/s11051-019-4540-310.1007/s11051-019-4540-3 ↗
32. 10.1039/c4ra12031k10.1039/c4ra12031k ↗
33. 10.1002/admi.20150004810.1002/admi.201500048 ↗
34. 10.1038/ncomms1120310.1038/ncomms11203 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.08.11510.1016/j.matlet.2014.08.115 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.10.09710.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.10.097 ↗
37. 10.1557/jmr.2017.28210.1557/jmr.2017.282 ↗
38. 10.1002/aenm.20130025310.1002/aenm.201300253 ↗
39. 10.1039/c4ta00234b10.1039/c4ta00234b ↗
40. 10.1021/jp507833u10.1021/jp507833u ↗
41. 10.1038/srep0191010.1038/srep01910 ↗
42. 10.1149/2.0651506jes10.1149/2.0651506jes ↗
43. 10.1021/jp111472410.1021/jp1114724 ↗
44. 10.1557/jmr.2014.8510.1557/jmr.2014.85 ↗
45. 10.1038/ncomms232710.1038/ncomms2327 ↗
46. 10.1002/aenm.20120108010.1002/aenm.201201080 ↗
47. 10.1038/s41467-017-00656-810.1038/s41467-017-00656-8 ↗
48. 10.1002/ange.20141110910.1002/ange.201411109 ↗
49. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0745810.1021/acsnano.5b07458 ↗
50. 10.1021/cm902050j10.1021/cm902050j ↗
51. 10.1039/c4ta03366c10.1039/c4ta03366c ↗
52. 10.1039/c3ta14113f10.1039/c3ta14113f ↗
53. 10.1002/ppap.20170017210.1002/ppap.201700172 ↗
54. 10.1002/batt.20200024510.1002/batt.202000245 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13699310.1016/j.electacta.2020.136993 ↗
56. 10.1002/ppap.20140009210.1002/ppap.201400092 ↗
57. Rego, R. J. M.; Havermans, D.; Cools, J. J. Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma Jet. U.S. Patent US8552335B22013.
58. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.02.00610.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.02.006 ↗
59. 10.1021/nn100653910.1021/nn1006539 ↗
60. 10.1021/nn203436j10.1021/nn203436j ↗
61. 10.1016/S0379-6779(98)01146-110.1016/S0379-6779(98)01146-1 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2010.03.01510.1016/j.synthmet.2010.03.015 ↗
63. 10.1002/jrs.154510.1002/jrs.1545 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.vibspec.2018.04.00610.1016/j.vibspec.2018.04.006 ↗
65. 10.1116/1.496801710.1116/1.4968017 ↗
66. 10.1186/1556-276X-9-55710.1186/1556-276X-9-557 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2008.07.00610.1016/j.synthmet.2008.07.006 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.10.00110.1016/j.polymer.2004.10.001 ↗
69. 10.4236/jsemat.2013.3100410.4236/jsemat.2013.31004 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.12.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.12.002 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.05.05510.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.05.055 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.cplett.2020.13742610.1016/j.cplett.2020.137426 ↗
73. 10.3390/polym1202033110.3390/polym12020331 ↗
74. 10.1038/srep0191010.1038/srep01910 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.02.00610.1016/j.joule.2020.02.006 ↗
76. 10.1039/c6nr04923k10.1039/c6nr04923k ↗
77. 10.1115/1.403473810.1115/1.4034738 ↗
78. 10.1021/nn504758510.1021/nn5047585 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.10.03310.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.10.033 ↗
80. 10.1149/2.026304jes10.1149/2.026304jes ↗
81. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.02.10110.1016/j.electacta.2013.02.101 ↗