Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) Plasma Coating of Sulfur for Mitigation of Capacity Fade in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
Sulfur particles with a conductive polymer coating of poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene) “PEDOT” were prepared by dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma technology under atmospheric conditions (low temperature, ambient pressure). We report a solvent-free, low-cost, low-energy-consumption, safe, and low-risk process to make the material development and production compatible for sustainable technologies. Different coating protocols were developed to produce PEDOT-coated sulfur powders with electrical conductivity in the range of 10–8–10–5 S/cm. The raw sulfur powder (used as the reference) and (low-, optimum-, high-) PEDOT-coated sulfur powders were used to assemble lithium–sulfur (Li–S) cells with a high sulfur loading of ∼4.5 mg/cm2. Long-term galvanostatic cycling at C/10 for 100 cycles showed that the capacity fade was mitigated by ∼30% for the cells containing the optimum-PEDOT-coated sulfur in comparison to the reference Li–S cells with raw sulfur. Rate capability, cyclic voltammetry, and electrochemical impedance analyzes confirmed the improved behavior of the PEDOT-coated sulfur as an active material for lithium–sulfur batteries. The Li–S cells containing optimum-PEDOT-coated sulfur showed the highest reproducibility of their electrochemical properties. A wide variety of bulk and surface characterization methods including conductivity analysis, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and NMR spectroscopy were used to explain the chemical features and the superior behavior of Li–S cells using the optimum-PEDOT-coated sulfur material. Moreover, postmortem [SEM and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET)] analyzes of uncoated and coated samples allowed us to exclude any significant effect at the electrode scale even after 70 cycles.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Sustainable Materials, VITO (Flemish Institute for Technological Research), Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium
Institute for Materials Research (imo-imomec), Hasselt University, Martelarenlaan 42, B 3500 Hasselt, Belgium
Energyville, Thor Park 8320, B-3600 Genk, Belgium
Imec vzw, div. imomec, Wetenschapspark 1, B 2590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Padua, via Marzolo, 1, 35131 Padova, PD, Italy
References (81)
Show source-provided references
1. Dudley, B. In BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2014, World Petroleum Conference, Moscow, 2014.
2. 10.3390/inorganics201013210.3390/inorganics2010132 ↗
3. 10.1142/9789814317665_002410.1142/9789814317665_0024 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0059410.1021/acsenergylett.6b00594 ↗
5. 10.1039/c5ta00361j10.1039/c5ta00361j ↗
6. 10.1021/cr500207g10.1021/cr500207g ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.01010.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.010 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.05110.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.051 ↗
9. 10.1002/aesr.20200010210.1002/aesr.202000102 ↗
10. IBM Research is reshaping the scene of sustainable batteries. https://www.ibm.com/blogs/nordic-msp/ibm-research-reshaping-scene-of-sustainable-batteries/ (accessed Apr 26, 2021).
11. Start—Battery 2030. https://battery2030.eu/ (accessed Apr 26, 2021).
12. 10.1002/anie.20130476210.1002/anie.201304762 ↗
13. 10.1002/aenm.20170026010.1002/aenm.201700260 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20160682310.1002/adma.201606823 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.gee.2017.08.00210.1016/j.gee.2017.08.002 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.05.02310.1016/j.ensm.2020.05.023 ↗
17. 10.1038/nmat246010.1038/nmat2460 ↗
18. 10.1166/jnn.2018.1545310.1166/jnn.2018.15453 ↗
19. 10.1002/chem.20140443910.1002/chem.201404439 ↗
20. 10.1021/nl200658a10.1021/nl200658a ↗
21. 10.1021/nn401228t10.1021/nn401228t ↗
22. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.08110.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.081 ↗
23. 10.1007/s41918-019-00048-010.1007/s41918-019-00048-0 ↗
24. 10.3390/en512519010.3390/en5125190 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.07.06710.1016/j.electacta.2013.07.067 ↗
26. 10.1021/nl403130h10.1021/nl403130h ↗
27. 10.1039/c3nr01393f10.1039/c3nr01393f ↗
28. 10.1021/nl400543y10.1021/nl400543y ↗
29. 10.1021/ar300094m10.1021/ar300094m ↗
30. 10.1021/ja308170k10.1021/ja308170k ↗
31. 10.1007/s11051-019-4540-310.1007/s11051-019-4540-3 ↗
32. 10.1039/c4ra12031k10.1039/c4ra12031k ↗
33. 10.1002/admi.20150004810.1002/admi.201500048 ↗
34. 10.1038/ncomms1120310.1038/ncomms11203 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.08.11510.1016/j.matlet.2014.08.115 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.10.09710.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.10.097 ↗
37. 10.1557/jmr.2017.28210.1557/jmr.2017.282 ↗
38. 10.1002/aenm.20130025310.1002/aenm.201300253 ↗
39. 10.1039/c4ta00234b10.1039/c4ta00234b ↗
40. 10.1021/jp507833u10.1021/jp507833u ↗
41. 10.1038/srep0191010.1038/srep01910 ↗
42. 10.1149/2.0651506jes10.1149/2.0651506jes ↗
43. 10.1021/jp111472410.1021/jp1114724 ↗
44. 10.1557/jmr.2014.8510.1557/jmr.2014.85 ↗
45. 10.1038/ncomms232710.1038/ncomms2327 ↗
46. 10.1002/aenm.20120108010.1002/aenm.201201080 ↗
47. 10.1038/s41467-017-00656-810.1038/s41467-017-00656-8 ↗
48. 10.1002/ange.20141110910.1002/ange.201411109 ↗
49. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0745810.1021/acsnano.5b07458 ↗
50. 10.1021/cm902050j10.1021/cm902050j ↗
51. 10.1039/c4ta03366c10.1039/c4ta03366c ↗
52. 10.1039/c3ta14113f10.1039/c3ta14113f ↗
53. 10.1002/ppap.20170017210.1002/ppap.201700172 ↗
54. 10.1002/batt.20200024510.1002/batt.202000245 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13699310.1016/j.electacta.2020.136993 ↗
56. 10.1002/ppap.20140009210.1002/ppap.201400092 ↗
57. Rego, R. J. M.; Havermans, D.; Cools, J. J. Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma Jet. U.S. Patent US8552335B22013.
58. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.02.00610.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.02.006 ↗
59. 10.1021/nn100653910.1021/nn1006539 ↗
60. 10.1021/nn203436j10.1021/nn203436j ↗
61. 10.1016/S0379-6779(98)01146-110.1016/S0379-6779(98)01146-1 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2010.03.01510.1016/j.synthmet.2010.03.015 ↗
63. 10.1002/jrs.154510.1002/jrs.1545 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.vibspec.2018.04.00610.1016/j.vibspec.2018.04.006 ↗
65. 10.1116/1.496801710.1116/1.4968017 ↗
66. 10.1186/1556-276X-9-55710.1186/1556-276X-9-557 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2008.07.00610.1016/j.synthmet.2008.07.006 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.10.00110.1016/j.polymer.2004.10.001 ↗
69. 10.4236/jsemat.2013.3100410.4236/jsemat.2013.31004 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.12.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.12.002 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.05.05510.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.05.055 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.cplett.2020.13742610.1016/j.cplett.2020.137426 ↗
73. 10.3390/polym1202033110.3390/polym12020331 ↗
74. 10.1038/srep0191010.1038/srep01910 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.02.00610.1016/j.joule.2020.02.006 ↗
76. 10.1039/c6nr04923k10.1039/c6nr04923k ↗
77. 10.1115/1.403473810.1115/1.4034738 ↗
78. 10.1021/nn504758510.1021/nn5047585 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.10.03310.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.10.033 ↗
80. 10.1149/2.026304jes10.1149/2.026304jes ↗
81. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.02.10110.1016/j.electacta.2013.02.101 ↗