journal article·2015-12-30

Hydrolytically Stable Thiol–ene Networks for Flexible Bioelectronics

Radu Reit, Daniel Zamorano, Shelbi Parker, Dustin Simon, Benjamin Lund, Walter Voit, Taylor H. Ware

Publisher page

Abstract

Hydrolytically stable, tunable modulus polymer networks are demonstrated to survive harsh alkaline environments and offer promise for use in long-term implantable bioelectronic medicines known as electroceuticals. Today's polymer networks (such as polyimides or polysiloxanes) succeed in providing either stiff or soft substrates for bioelectronics devices; however, the capability to significantly tune the modulus of such materials is lacking. Within the space of materials with easily modified elastic moduli, thiol-ene copolymers are a subset of materials that offer a promising solution to build next generation flexible bioelectronics but have typically been susceptible to hydrolytic degradation chronically. In this inquiry, we demonstrate a materials space capable of tuning the substrate modulus and explore the mechanical behavior of such networks. Furthermore, we fabricate an array of microelectrodes that can withstand accelerated aging environments shown to destroy conventional flexible bioelectronics.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Conducting polymers and applications · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Bioengineering, ‡Department of Chemistry, §Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and ∥Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell Road, Mailstop RL 10, Richardson, Texas 75080, United States

Funding

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency · Division of Graduate Education

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/496159a10.1038/496159a ↗
2. 10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/04601010.1088/1741-2560/8/4/046010 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.02910.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.029 ↗
4. 10.1002/adfm.20120020010.1002/adfm.201200200 ↗
5. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3489-07.200710.1523/JNEUROSCI.3489-07.2007 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.126031810.1126/science.1260318 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.07.01510.1016/j.cgh.2010.07.015 ↗
8. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10789.x10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10789.x ↗
9. 10.1039/b901979k10.1039/b901979k ↗
10. 10.1002/jbmb.3294610.1002/jbmb.32946 ↗
11. 10.1002/ange.20100081810.1002/ange.201000818 ↗
12. 10.1021/bm300671s10.1021/bm300671s ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20140042010.1002/adma.201400420 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10544-013-9782-810.1007/s10544-013-9782-8 ↗
15. Roberts J. S. · 2000
16. Roy K.-M. · 2000
17. 10.1039/B9PY00216B10.1039/B9PY00216B ↗
18. 10.1021/cr940351u10.1021/cr940351u ↗
19. 10.1023/A:102282652867310.1023/A:1022826528673 ↗
20. 10.1039/C4PY01552E10.1039/C4PY01552E ↗
21. 10.1088/1741-2560/2/4/00610.1088/1741-2560/2/4/006 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.12347810.1063/1.123478 ↗
23. Landel R. F. · 199310.1201/b16929 ↗
24. 10.1080/1558372690854589710.1080/15583726908545897 ↗
25. 10.1021/ma100445210.1021/ma1004452 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.03.02610.1016/j.polymer.2009.03.026 ↗
27. Takashima, Y.; Tamura, H.; Hikosaka, T.; Takehana, M.Google Patents; 2005.https://patents.google.com/(accessed Dec 1, 2015).
28. 10.1002/mame.20120024110.1002/mame.201200241 ↗
29. 10.1016/0032-3861(91)90115-Y10.1016/0032-3861(91)90115-Y ↗
30. 10.1038/ncomms198010.1038/ncomms1980 ↗
31. 10.1002/adfm.20090140910.1002/adfm.200901409 ↗
32. 10.1039/C5PY00172B10.1039/C5PY00172B ↗
33. 10.1016/S0165-0270(00)00192-810.1016/S0165-0270(00)00192-8 ↗
34. 10.1023/A:100995522211410.1023/A:1009955222114 ↗
35. 10.1109/10.867010.1109/10.8670 ↗
36. 10.1039/C2LC40935F10.1039/C2LC40935F ↗