journal article·2022-10-05Open access

Polycrystalline Diamond Coating on Orthopedic Implants: Realization and Role of Surface Topology and Chemistry in Adsorption of Proteins and Cell Proliferation

Justas Zalieckas, Ivan R. Mondragon, Paulius Pobedinskas, Arne S. Kristoffersen, Samih Mohamed-Ahmed, Cecilie Gjerde, Paul J. Høl, Geir Hallan, Ove N. Furnes, Mihaela Roxana Cimpan, Ken Haenen, Bodil Holst, Martin M. Greve

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 14· Issue 39

Abstract

Polycrystalline diamond has the potential to improve the osseointegration of orthopedic implants compared to conventional materials such as titanium. However, despite the excellent biocompatibility and superior mechanical properties, the major challenge of using diamond for implants, such as those used for hip arthroplasty, is the limitation of microwave plasma chemical vapor deposition (CVD) techniques to synthesize diamond on complex-shaped objects. Here, for the first time, we demonstrate diamond growth on titanium acetabular shells using the surface wave plasma CVD method. Polycrystalline diamond coatings were synthesized at low temperatures (∼400 °C) on three types of acetabular shells with different surface structures and porosities. We achieved the growth of diamond on highly porous surfaces designed to mimic the structure of the trabecular bone and improve osseointegration. Biocompatibility was investigated on nanocrystalline diamond (NCD) and ultrananocrystalline diamond (UNCD) coatings terminated either with hydrogen or oxygen. To understand the role of diamond surface topology and chemistry in the attachment and proliferation of mammalian cells, we investigated the adsorption of extracellular matrix proteins and monitored the metabolic activity of fibroblasts, osteoblasts, and bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). The interaction of bovine serum albumin and type I collagen with the diamond surfaces was investigated by confocal fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM). We found that the proliferation of osteogenic cells was better on hydrogen-terminated UNCD than on the oxygen-terminated counterpart. These findings correlated with the behavior of collagen on diamond substrates observed by FLIM. Hydrogen-terminated UNCD provided better adhesion and proliferation of osteogenic cells, compared to titanium, while the growth of fibroblasts was poorest on hydrogen-terminated NCD and MSCs behaved similarly on all tested surfaces. These results open new opportunities for application of diamond coatings on orthopedic implants to further improve bone fixation and osseointegration.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Allegaten 55, 5007 Bergen, Norway

Department for Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Årstadveien 19, 5009 Bergen, Norway

Institute for Materials Research (IMO), Hasselt University, Wetenschapspark 1, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium

IMOMEC, Interuniversity MicroElectronics Center (IMEC) vzw, Wetenschapspark 1, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies vei 65, 5021 Bergen, Norway

Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Jonas Lies vei 87, 5021 Bergen, Norway

Funding

Methusalem NANO network

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30059-410.1016/S0140-6736(17)30059-4 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.05.05610.1016/j.apsusc.2014.05.056 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.10.03610.1016/j.actbio.2018.10.036 ↗
4. Singh, G.; Agrawal, K.; Singh, S.; Satya, P. Hydroxyapatite Coating for BioImplants and Problem Associated with Coating Techniques: A Review Int. Conf. Prod. Ind. Eng. 2010.
5. 10.3390/coatings1107079110.3390/coatings11070791 ↗
6. 10.1002/adhm.20210000710.1002/adhm.202100007 ↗
7. 10.1002/jbm.a.3282110.1002/jbm.a.32821 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.03.01410.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.03.014 ↗
9. 10.3390/s9050354910.3390/s90503549 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.diamond.2004.03.00310.1016/j.diamond.2004.03.003 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.9b0706410.1021/acsami.9b07064 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10856-016-5798-y10.1007/s10856-016-5798-y ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.05.00510.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.05.005 ↗
14. 10.1088/0022-3727/43/37/37401710.1088/0022-3727/43/37/374017 ↗
15. Humin L. · 1995
16. Narayan R. · 201310.1533/9780857093516 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.diamond.2021.10839410.1016/j.diamond.2021.108394 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.7b1859610.1021/acsami.7b18596 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.12681510.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126815 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.diamond.2014.05.00410.1016/j.diamond.2014.05.004 ↗
21. 10.1088/0963-0252/19/1/01500310.1088/0963-0252/19/1/015003 ↗
22. 10.1002/pssb.20120010310.1002/pssb.201200103 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.12546010.1103/PhysRevB.82.125460 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.diamond.2019.02.01610.1016/j.diamond.2019.02.016 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.05.08310.1016/j.apsusc.2014.05.083 ↗
26. 10.1007/s10856-016-5696-310.1007/s10856-016-5696-3 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.08.01510.1016/j.actbio.2008.08.015 ↗
28. 10.2147/IJN.S7362810.2147/IJN.S73628 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsabm.1c0075710.1021/acsabm.1c00757 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.04510.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.045 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14801610.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148016 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cplett.2015.10.00210.1016/j.cplett.2015.10.002 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.cplett.2007.07.09110.1016/j.cplett.2007.07.091 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.35275410.1063/1.352754 ↗
35. 10.1016/0925-9635(95)00349-510.1016/0925-9635(95)00349-5 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0257-8972(97)00239-910.1016/S0257-8972(97)00239-9 ↗
37. 10.1073/pnas.94.3.84910.1073/pnas.94.3.849 ↗
38. 10.1038/ncomms166810.1038/ncomms1668 ↗
39. 10.1242/jcs.04118610.1242/jcs.041186 ↗
40. 10.1002/bies.2072010.1002/bies.20720 ↗
41. 10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z ↗
42. 10.1016/j.diamond.2011.03.03110.1016/j.diamond.2011.03.031 ↗
43. 10.1088/0022-3727/48/6/06520110.1088/0022-3727/48/6/065201 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.1271010.1103/PhysRevB.60.12710 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.12140510.1103/PhysRevB.63.121405 ↗
46. 10.1016/S0925-9635(02)00336-910.1016/S0925-9635(02)00336-9 ↗
47. 10.1021/jp910555x10.1021/jp910555x ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0417710.1021/acs.langmuir.6b04177 ↗
49. 10.1039/B612870J10.1039/B612870J ↗
50. 10.1016/S0168-1656(00)00242-X10.1016/S0168-1656(00)00242-X ↗
51. 10.1002/pssa.20110050310.1002/pssa.201100503 ↗
52. 10.1021/jp409936v10.1021/jp409936v ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jsb.2004.07.00110.1016/j.jsb.2004.07.001 ↗
54. 10.1073/pnas.060321610310.1073/pnas.0603216103 ↗
55. 10.1039/B816125A10.1039/B816125A ↗
56. 10.1371/journal.pone.014506810.1371/journal.pone.0145068 ↗
57. 10.1038/srep0055510.1038/srep00555 ↗
58. 10.1242/jcs.14434510.1242/jcs.144345 ↗
59. 10.1038/srep0602410.1038/srep06024 ↗
60. 10.1089/ten.TEC.2011.063510.1089/ten.TEC.2011.0635 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.11.01510.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.11.015 ↗
62. 10.1515/ntrev-2020-007610.1515/ntrev-2020-0076 ↗
63. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01195.x10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01195.x ↗
64. 10.1002/smll.20190542210.1002/smll.201905422 ↗
65. 10.1097/00003086-200011000-0002410.1097/00003086-200011000-00024 ↗
66. 10.3390/cells1007179410.3390/cells10071794 ↗
67. 10.1186/s12989-020-00374-y10.1186/s12989-020-00374-y ↗
68. 10.1021/jp066387v10.1021/jp066387v ↗
69. 10.1073/pnas.82.3.76510.1073/pnas.82.3.765 ↗