Effective Breaking of the Fluorocarbon Chain by the Interface Bi2O2X···PFOA Complex Strategy via Coordinated Se on Construction of the Internal Photogenerated Carrier Pathway
Source abstract
Abstract
The destruction of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) from outside was inhibited by the “barrel spiral” barrier, but the construction of the photocatalyst–PFOA complex provided a direct attack on photogenerated reactive species (RSs). Here, we investigated the bridging ability of bismuth oxychalcogenide (Bi2O2X) for constructing an effective photocarrier pathway to PFOA. The experimental results and DFT calculations showed that a more intense internal access of Bi2O2Se was built via the terminal carboxylate tail, and the weaker electrostatic interaction of Bi–Se bonds helped realize the smaller band gap and slower recombination of photocarriers, thereby inhibiting the invalid annihilation of holes with H2O and facilitating the transformation of electrons to O2–•. The pseudo-first-order rate coefficient (kobs) was 2 and 4 times higher than Bi2O2S and TiO2, respectively, showing the outstanding photocatalytic activity of Bi2O2Se. A broad pH (4–8) adaptability of Bi2O2Se was observed for defluorination, especially in alkali condition. This new understanding may inspire the development of Se-coordinated catalysts.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds · Ga2O3 and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control (SKLESP), Beijing Key Laboratory for Emerging Organic Contaminants Control (BKLEOC), Beijing Laboratory for Environmental Frontier Technologies (BLEFT), School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 10084, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (84)
Show source-provided references
1. OECD. Toward a New Comprehensive Global Database of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs): Summary Report on Updating the OECD 2007 list of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=ENV-JM-MONO(2018)7&doclanguage=en (accessed Jan 14, 2019).
2. Brooke D. · 2004
3. 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c0025510.1021/acs.estlett.0c00255 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.est.6b0065210.1021/acs.est.6b00652 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.est.0c0797810.1021/acs.est.0c07978 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.est.0c0447210.1021/acs.est.0c04472 ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.est.0c0447310.1021/acs.est.0c04473 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.est.1c0052210.1021/acs.est.1c00522 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.est.0c0458710.1021/acs.est.0c04587 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.est.9b0092710.1021/acs.est.9b00927 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.estlett.8b0039510.1021/acs.estlett.8b00395 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.12993410.1016/j.cej.2021.129934 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.11991110.1016/j.apcatb.2021.119911 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12307010.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123070 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.11844210.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118442 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12499110.1016/j.cej.2020.124991 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12345910.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123459 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.05.08410.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.05.084 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12353010.1016/j.cej.2019.123530 ↗
20. 10.1021/es204279u10.1021/es204279u ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.04.04210.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.04.042 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.12967610.1016/j.cej.2021.129676 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.catcom.2009.01.01710.1016/j.catcom.2009.01.017 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.12472210.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124722 ↗
25. 10.1021/acscatal.8b0266010.1021/acscatal.8b02660 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.est.0c0455810.1021/acs.est.0c04558 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11928310.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119283 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.watres.2020.11621910.1016/j.watres.2020.116219 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c0043410.1021/acs.estlett.0c00434 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.10.03810.1016/j.apcatb.2013.10.038 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11985110.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119851 ↗
32. 10.1021/es060852k10.1021/es060852k ↗
33. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13067210.1016/j.cej.2021.130672 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.12518610.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125186 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.05010.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.050 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.physb.2012.04.03910.1016/j.physb.2012.04.039 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.10.06610.1016/j.apcatb.2016.10.066 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.11826210.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118262 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.10.05510.1016/j.apcatb.2017.10.055 ↗
40. 10.1038/nnano.2017.4310.1038/nnano.2017.43 ↗
41. 10.1002/adfm.20180797910.1002/adfm.201807979 ↗
42. 10.1126/sciadv.aat835510.1126/sciadv.aat8355 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.est.0c0609110.1021/acs.est.0c06091 ↗
44. 10.1088/1361-6528/ac175310.1088/1361-6528/ac1753 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12593110.1016/j.cej.2020.125931 ↗
46. 10.1002/admt.20200018010.1002/admt.202000180 ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.est.8b0217210.1021/acs.est.8b02172 ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.est.8b0582710.1021/acs.est.8b05827 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.12010510.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120105 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.741310.1103/PhysRevB.59.7413 ↗
51. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
53. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
54. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
55. 10.3390/cryst909046310.3390/cryst9090463 ↗
56. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0302010.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03020 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.12024910.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120249 ↗
58. 10.1021/am509215910.1021/am5092159 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2013.12.00710.1016/j.jphotochem.2013.12.007 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12593110.1016/j.cej.2020.125931 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11947810.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119478 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.12039310.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120393 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.mcat.2021.11163310.1016/j.mcat.2021.111633 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.07.05810.1016/j.cclet.2019.07.058 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.05810.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.058 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.07.13010.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.07.130 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12268610.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122686 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.09.00810.1016/j.apcatb.2017.09.008 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11972710.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119727 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.01.03710.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.01.037 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11863410.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118634 ↗
72. 10.1002/jat.341810.1002/jat.3418 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.taap.2014.03.01210.1016/j.taap.2014.03.012 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.01.02510.1016/j.toxlet.2013.01.025 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.01.01910.1016/j.yrtph.2019.01.019 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2011.08.00410.1016/j.reprotox.2011.08.004 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.envint.2018.01.01110.1016/j.envint.2018.01.011 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.00310.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.003 ↗
79. 10.1080/10643389.2011.62701610.1080/10643389.2011.627016 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.13733310.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137333 ↗
81. 10.3389/fendo.2020.61232010.3389/fendo.2020.612320 ↗
82. 10.1186/s12302-018-0134-410.1186/s12302-018-0134-4 ↗
83. U.S. National Toxicology Program Toxiciy Report 97: NTP Technical Report on The Toxicity Studies of Perfluoroalkyl Carboxylates (Perfluorohexanoic Acid, Perfluorooctanoic Acid, Perfluorononanoic Acid, and Perfluorodecanoic Acid) Administered by Gavage to Sprague Dawley (Hsd:Sprague Dawley SD) Rat; Research Triangle Park: NC, 2019.
84. 10.1016/j.fct.2021.11252810.1016/j.fct.2021.112528 ↗