journal article·2023-05-17

Mitigating Dendrite Formation on a Zn Electrode in Aqueous Zinc Chloride by the Competitive Surface Chemistry of an Imidazole Additive

Ashutosh Rana, Anup Thakare, Nikhil Kumar, Buddhadev Mukherjee, Arun Torris, Bidisa Das, Satishchandra Ogale, Abhik Banerjee

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 15· Issue 19
Publisher page

Abstract

Electrochemical energy storage systems are critical in several ways for a smooth transition from nonrenewable to renewable energy sources. Zn-based batteries are one of the promising alternatives to the existing state-of-the-art Li-ion battery technology, since Li-ion batteries pose significant drawbacks in terms of safety and cost-effectiveness. Zn (with a reduction potential of −0.76 V vs SHE) has a significantly higher theoretical volumetric capacity (5851 mAh/cm 3 ) than Li (2061 mAh/cm 3 ), and it is certainly far less expensive, safer, and more earth-abundant. The formation of dendrites, hydrogen evolution, and the formation of a ZnO passivation layer on the Zn anode are the primary challenges in the development and deployment of rechargeable zinc batteries. In this work, we examine the role of imidazole as an electrolyte additive in 2 M ZnCl 2 to prevent dendrite formation during zinc electrodeposition via experimental (kinetics and imaging) and theoretical density functional theory (DFT) studies. To characterize the efficacy and to identify the appropriate concentration of imidazole, linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) and chronoamperometry (CA) are performed with in situ monitoring of the electrodeposited zinc. The addition of 0.025 wt % imidazole to 2 M ZnCl 2 increases the cycle life of Zn-symmetric cells cycled at 1 mA/cm 2 for 60 min of plating and stripping dramatically from 90 to 240 h. A higher value of the nucleation overpotential is noted in the presence of imidazole, which suggests that imidazole is adsorbed at a competitively faster rate on the surface of zinc, thereby suppressing the zinc electrodeposition kinetics and the formation. X-ray tomography reveals that a short circuit caused by dendrite formation is the main plausible failure mechanism of Zn symmetric cells. It is observed that the electrodeposition of zinc is more homogeneous in the presence of imidazole, and its presence in the electrolyte also inhibits the production of a passivating coating (ZnO) on the Zn surface, thereby preventing corrosion. DFT calculations conform well with the stated experimental observations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune, Dr. Homi Bhabha Road, Pune 411008, India

Research Institute for Sustainable Energy, Centre for Research and Education in Science and Technology (TCG-CREST), Salt Lake, Kolkata 700091, India

School of Applied and Interdisciplinary Sciences (SAIS), Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science (IACS), Jadavpur, Kolkata 700032, India

Polymer Science and Engineering Division, CSIR─National Chemical Laboratory, Dr. Homi Bhabha Road, Pune 411008, India

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41560-019-0425-z10.1038/s41560-019-0425-z ↗
2. 10.1038/s41560-019-0369-310.1038/s41560-019-0369-3 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.aam628410.1126/science.aam6284 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41560-020-00695-410.1038/s41560-020-00695-4 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.04.01110.1016/j.joule.2020.04.011 ↗
6. 10.1039/C9TA06433H10.1039/C9TA06433H ↗
7. 10.1021/cr500232y10.1021/cr500232y ↗
8. 10.1039/C7CS00863E10.1039/C7CS00863E ↗
9. 10.1039/D0CS00305K10.1039/D0CS00305K ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.10.02710.1016/j.ensm.2020.10.027 ↗
11. 10.1126/sciadv.aba409810.1126/sciadv.aba4098 ↗
12. 10.1002/ange.20110630710.1002/ange.201106307 ↗
13. 10.1039/D0SC00022A10.1039/D0SC00022A ↗
14. 10.1007/s40820-021-00782-510.1007/s40820-021-00782-5 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13946510.1016/j.cej.2022.139465 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20200185410.1002/adma.202001854 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0268410.1021/acsenergylett.0c02684 ↗
18. 10.1021/jacs.6b0595810.1021/jacs.6b05958 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41563-018-0063-z10.1038/s41563-018-0063-z ↗
20. 10.1021/ja00118a01210.1021/ja00118a012 ↗
21. 10.1039/C9TA04735B10.1039/C9TA04735B ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.04.11010.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.04.110 ↗
23. 10.1021/jacs.0c0979410.1021/jacs.0c09794 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.1c1440710.1021/acsami.1c14407 ↗
25. 10.1149/2.040311jes10.1149/2.040311jes ↗
26. 10.1002/adfm.20200393210.1002/adfm.202003932 ↗
27. 10.5006/1.329355410.5006/1.3293554 ↗
28. 10.1002/ange.20210575610.1002/ange.202105756 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c0123510.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01235 ↗
30. 10.1002/adma.20220928810.1002/adma.202209288 ↗
31. Frisch, M.; Trucks, G.; Schlegel, H.; Scuseria, G.; Robb, M.; Cheeseman, J.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.; Nakatsuji, H. Gaussian 16, Revision C. 01. Gaussian Inc.: Wallingford CT, 2016.
32. 10.1063/1.46491310.1063/1.464913 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.78510.1103/PhysRevB.37.785 ↗
34. 10.1139/p80-15910.1139/p80-159 ↗
35. 10.1021/j100096a00110.1021/j100096a001 ↗
36. 10.1021/ct050276310.1021/ct0502763 ↗
37. 10.1021/jp810292n10.1021/jp810292n ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.19530910.1103/PhysRevB.96.195309 ↗
39. 10.1039/C6EE01674J10.1039/C6EE01674J ↗
40. Bard A. J. · 2022
41. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.12.10010.1016/j.electacta.2014.12.100 ↗
42. 10.1002/advs.20200330110.1002/advs.202003301 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0475510.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04755 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsami.0c0600910.1021/acsami.0c06009 ↗
45. 10.1155/2018/207927810.1155/2018/2079278 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.05.04310.1016/j.materresbull.2017.05.043 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.abb.2016.04.01010.1016/j.abb.2016.04.010 ↗
48. 10.1073/pnas.060243910310.1073/pnas.0602439103 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.09.02110.1016/j.ensm.2021.09.021 ↗
50. 10.1002/aenm.20210400110.1002/aenm.202104001 ↗