journal article·2022-11-23

Chondroitin Sulfate-Derived Paclitaxel Nanocrystal via π–π Stacking with Enhanced Stability and Tumor Targetability

Dandan Huang, Jiajia Gui, Xue Chen, Ruilian Yu, Tao Gong, Zhirong Zhang, Yao Fu

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 14· Issue 46
Publisher page

Abstract

Nanocrystals with high drug loading have become a viable strategy for solubilizing drugs with poor aqueous solubility. It remains challenging, however, to synthesize nanocrystals with sufficient stability and targeting potential. Here, we report a novel nanocrystal platform synthesized using paclitaxel (PTX) and Fmoc-8-amino-3,6-dioxaoctanoic acid (Fmoc-AEEA)-conjugated chondroitin sulfate (CS) (CS-Fmoc) via π–π stacking to afford a stable formulation with CD44 targetability (PTX NC@CS-Fmoc). The PTX NC@CS-Fmoc exhibited rodlike shapes with an average hydrodynamic size of 173.6 ± 0.7 nm (PDI = 0.11 ± 0.04) and a drug loading of up to 31.3 ± 0.6%. Next, PTX NC@CS-Fmoc was subjected to lyophilization in the absence of cryoprotectants for long-term storage, and after redispersion, PTX NC@CS-Fmoc displayed an average hydrodynamic size of 205.3 ± 2.9 nm (PDI = 0.15 ± 0.01). In murine Panc02 cells, PTX NC@CS-Fmoc showed higher internalization efficiency than that of PTX nanocrystals without CS modification (PTX NC@F127) (P < 0.05) or that of CS-Fmoc micelles (P < 0.05). Moreover, PTX NC@CS-Fmoc appeared to accumulate in both lysosomes and Golgi apparatus, while CS-Fmoc micelles accumulated specifically in the Golgi apparatus. In the orthotopic Panc02 tumor-bearing mice model, PTX NC@CS-Fmoc showed higher tumor-specific accumulation than CS-Fmoc micelles, which also demonstrated comparable tumor growth inhibition as to Nab-PTX. Overall, the CS-Fmoc-derived nanocrystals represent a neat and viable formulation strategy for targeted chemotherapy with great potential for translational studies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Drug-Targeting and Drug Delivery System of the Education Ministry and Sichuan Province, Sichuan Engineering Laboratory for Plant-Sourced Drug and Sichuan Research Center for Drug Precision Industrial Technology, West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu610041, China

Department of Oncology, Sichuan Provincial People′s Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu610072, China

Funding

Central University Basic Research Fund of China · Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Higher Education Discipline Innovation Project

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1208/s12249-014-0107-x10.1208/s12249-014-0107-x ↗
2. 10.1007/s11051-020-05136-710.1007/s11051-020-05136-7 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsami.1c0018410.1021/acsami.1c00184 ↗
4. 10.1186/s12951-021-01062-510.1186/s12951-021-01062-5 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.03.01310.1016/j.jconrel.2012.03.013 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.11146110.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111461 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsabm.0c0059910.1021/acsabm.0c00599 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.02.04510.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.02.045 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2012.01.00510.1016/j.ejpb.2012.01.005 ↗
10. 10.1208/s12249-017-0889-810.1208/s12249-017-0889-8 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.addr.2011.03.01110.1016/j.addr.2011.03.011 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.08.00610.1016/j.jconrel.2013.08.006 ↗
13. 10.1021/bm401593n10.1021/bm401593n ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.12.02310.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.12.023 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.19310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.193 ↗
16. 10.1002/bit.2812210.1002/bit.28122 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.07510.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.075 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.05.04310.1016/j.carbpol.2016.05.043 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0692410.1021/acsnano.8b06924 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0416610.1021/acsnano.9b04166 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.06.01110.1016/j.ejpb.2015.06.011 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.03210.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.032 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b0150310.1021/acs.cgd.7b01503 ↗
24. 10.1021/mp300422610.1021/mp3004226 ↗
25. 10.1155/2019/862046910.1155/2019/8620469 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.6b1515110.1021/acsami.6b15151 ↗
27. 10.1039/C9TB02780G10.1039/C9TB02780G ↗
28. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.10810.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.108 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.10.01610.1016/j.jconrel.2014.10.016 ↗
30. 10.1021/mp500817h10.1021/mp500817h ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apsb.2018.12.00910.1016/j.apsb.2018.12.009 ↗
32. 10.1039/C9NR03684A10.1039/C9NR03684A ↗
33. 10.1208/s12248-013-9536-910.1208/s12248-013-9536-9 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b0048310.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00483 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.03.01310.1016/j.jconrel.2004.03.013 ↗
36. 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-31158510.1136/gutjnl-2016-311585 ↗
37. 10.1093/jpp/rgab09610.1093/jpp/rgab096 ↗
38. 10.1007/s00396-020-04778-210.1007/s00396-020-04778-2 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.10.05110.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.10.051 ↗
40. 10.1080/10717544.2020.185622410.1080/10717544.2020.1856224 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.07.06310.1016/j.carbpol.2015.07.063 ↗
42. 10.1007/s11837-019-03768-210.1007/s11837-019-03768-2 ↗
43. 10.1021/la504000v10.1021/la504000v ↗
44. 10.1039/C6NR07179A10.1039/C6NR07179A ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ajps.2021.03.00410.1016/j.ajps.2021.03.004 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.06010.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.060 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.nano.2015.07.00410.1016/j.nano.2015.07.004 ↗
48. 10.1021/mp500436p10.1021/mp500436p ↗
49. 10.1002/1873-3468.1356710.1002/1873-3468.13567 ↗
50. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-135610.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1356 ↗
51. 10.1080/15384101.2018.148022310.1080/15384101.2018.1480223 ↗
52. 10.3390/ijms2018450410.3390/ijms20184504 ↗
53. 10.1038/bjc.2016.21510.1038/bjc.2016.215 ↗
54. 10.3390/cancers911015710.3390/cancers9110157 ↗
55. 10.2147/OTT.S4070510.2147/OTT.S40705 ↗
56. 10.1007/s00280-016-3058-y10.1007/s00280-016-3058-y ↗