Li+ Conductivity of Space Charge Layers Formed at Electrified Interfaces Between a Model Solid-State Electrolyte and Blocking Au-Electrodes
Source abstract
Abstract
The formation of space charge layers in solid-state ion conductors has been investigated as early as the 1980s. With the advent of all-solid-state batteries as an alternative to traditional Li-ion batteries, possibly improving performance and safety, the phenomenon of space charge formation caught the attention of researchers as a possible origin for the observed high interfacial resistance. Following classical space charge theory, such high resistances result from the formation of the depletion layers. These layers of up to hundreds of nanometers in thickness are almost free of mobile cations. With the prediction of a Debye-like screening effect, the thickness of the depletion layer is expected to scale with the square root of the absolute temperature. In this work, we studied the temperature dependence of the depletion layer properties in model solid Ohara LICGC Li+ conducting electrolytes using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. We show that the activation energy inside the depletion layer increases to ca 0.42 eV compared to ca 0.39 eV in the bulk electrolyte. Moreover, the proportionality between temperature and depletion layer thickness, correlating to the Debye length, is tested and validated.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Physik-Department ECS, Technische Universität München, James-Franck-Strasse 1, 85748 Garching, Germany
TUMint·Energy Research, Lichtenbergstrasse 4, 85748 Garching, Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · Bayerische Staatsministerium f?r Wirtschaft, Landesentwicklung und Energie
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/ente.20200058010.1002/ente.202000580 ↗
2. 10.1007/s12274-018-2205-710.1007/s12274-018-2205-7 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jechem.2019.12.02410.1016/j.jechem.2019.12.024 ↗
4. 10.1002/aenm.20200268910.1002/aenm.202002689 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ssi.2015.11.03410.1016/j.ssi.2015.11.034 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.10540710.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.105407 ↗
7. 10.1016/0013-4686(81)85017-710.1016/0013-4686(81)85017-7 ↗
8. 10.1002/aenm.20150009610.1002/aenm.201500096 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0267910.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02679 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0114110.1021/acsaem.8b01141 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0065910.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00659 ↗
12. 10.1021/la991621c10.1021/la991621c ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ssi.2009.03.02210.1016/j.ssi.2009.03.022 ↗
14. Becker-Steinberger K. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2020 · 1
15. 10.1021/acsami.0c2298610.1021/acsami.0c22986 ↗
16. 10.1039/C4CP02921F10.1039/C4CP02921F ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ssi.2014.10.01710.1016/j.ssi.2014.10.017 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41467-017-01187-y10.1038/s41467-017-01187-y ↗
19. 10.1002/ange.20181466910.1002/ange.201814669 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.0c2130410.1021/acsami.0c21304 ↗
21. 10.1039/D1CP00673H10.1039/D1CP00673H ↗
22. 10.1007/s10832-017-0071-410.1007/s10832-017-0071-4 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.04.00210.1016/j.joule.2020.04.002 ↗
24. Bandarenka, A. S. Development of hybrid algorithms for EIS data fitting, a book Chapter in: Lecture Notes on Impedance Spectroscopy. Measurement, Modeling and Applications, Vol. 4/Ed. Kanoun; O. CRC Press, Tailor and Francis Group: London, 2013; pp 29–36.
25. 10.1007/s10832-016-0061-y10.1007/s10832-016-0061-y ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b0455510.1021/acs.jpcb.5b04555 ↗
27. 10.1039/C5TA06379E10.1039/C5TA06379E ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20210058510.1002/adma.202100585 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ssi.2008.01.07110.1016/j.ssi.2008.01.071 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jmat.2015.03.00210.1016/j.jmat.2015.03.002 ↗
31. 10.1021/nl025938010.1021/nl0259380 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.35465610.1063/1.354656 ↗