journal article·2021-07-21Open access

Surface Engineering of FLT4-Targeted Nanocarriers Enhances Cell-Softening Glaucoma Therapy

Michael P. Vincent, Trevor Stack, Amir Vahabikashi, Guorong Li, Kristin M. Perkumas, Ruiyi Ren, Haiyan Gong, W. Daniel Stamer, Mark Johnson, Evan A. Scott

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 13· Issue 28

Abstract

Primary open-angle glaucoma is associated with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) that damages the optic nerve and leads to gradual vision loss. Several agents that reduce the stiffness of pressure-regulating Schlemm’s canal (SC) endothelial cells, in the conventional outflow pathway of the eye, lower IOP in glaucoma patients and are approved for clinical use. However, poor drug penetration and uncontrolled biodistribution limit their efficacy and produce local adverse effects. Compared to other ocular endothelia, FLT4/VEGFR3 is expressed at elevated levels by SC endothelial cells and can be exploited for targeted drug delivery. Here, we validate FLT4 receptors as clinically relevant targets on SC cells from glaucomatous human donors and engineer polymeric self-assembled nanocarriers displaying lipid-anchored targeting ligands that optimally engage this receptor. Targeting constructs were synthesized as lipid-PEGx-peptide, differing in the number of PEG spacer units (x), and were embedded in micelles. We present a novel proteolysis assay for quantifying ligand accessibility that we employ to design and optimize our FLT4-targeting strategy for glaucoma nanotherapy. Peptide accessibility to proteases correlated with receptor-mediated targeting enhancements. Increasing the accessibility of FLT4-binding peptides enhanced nanocarrier uptake by SC cells while simultaneously decreasing the uptake by off-target vascular endothelial cells. Using a paired longitudinal IOP study in vivo, we show that this enhanced targeting of SC cells translates to IOP reductions that are sustained for a significantly longer time as compared to controls. Confocal microscopy of murine anterior segment tissue confirmed nanocarrier localization to SC within 1 h after intracameral administration. This work demonstrates that steric effects between surface-displayed ligands and PEG coronas significantly impact the targeting performance of synthetic nanocarriers across multiple biological scales. Minimizing the obstruction of modular targeting ligands by PEG measurably improved the efficacy of glaucoma nanotherapy and is an important consideration for engineering PEGylated nanocarriers for targeted drug delivery.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Glaucoma and retinal disorders · Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research · Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States

Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States

Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States

Department of Ophthalmology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, United States

Department of Ophthalmology, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, United States

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States

Department of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States

Simpson Querrey Institute, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA

Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States

Funding

National Eye Institute · NIH Office of the Director · Directorate for Engineering

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.01310.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)76896-510.1016/S0002-9394(14)76896-5 ↗
3. Quigley H. A. · Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. · 1995 · 36 · 774
4. Allingham R. R. · Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. · 1992 · 33 · 1661
5. Johnson M. · Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. · 1992 · 33 · 1670
6. Sit A. J. · Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. · 1997 · 38 · 1517
7. Ethier C. R. · Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. · 1998 · 39 · 2041
8. Johnson M. · Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. · 2002 · 43 · 2950
9. 10.1016/j.exer.2005.10.01110.1016/j.exer.2005.10.011 ↗
10. 10.1098/rsif.2011.073310.1098/rsif.2011.0733 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.exer.2014.08.00310.1016/j.exer.2014.08.003 ↗
12. 10.1073/pnas.141060211110.1073/pnas.1410602111 ↗
13. 10.1073/pnas.191183711610.1073/pnas.1911837116 ↗
14. 10.1007/BF0295598410.1007/BF02955984 ↗
15. 10.1007/BF0172061810.1007/BF01720618 ↗
16. 10.1007/BF0185859210.1007/BF01858592 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0002-9394(42)93294-X10.1016/S0002-9394(42)93294-X ↗
18. 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1964.tb02865.x10.1111/j.1748-1716.1964.tb02865.x ↗
19. 10.1016/S0014-4835(64)80033-610.1016/S0014-4835(64)80033-6 ↗
20. Bill A. · Invest. Ophthalmol. · 1965 · 4 · 911
21. Bill A. · Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. · 1965 · 4 · 920
22. 10.1001/archopht.1951.0170002011900110.1001/archopht.1951.01700020119001 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.04.04010.1016/j.ophtha.2018.04.040 ↗
24. 10.1016/s0014-4835(77)80037-710.1016/s0014-4835(77)80037-7 ↗
25. Peterson J. A. · Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. · 1999 · 40 · 931
26. 10.1006/exer.1999.079710.1006/exer.1999.0797 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.01.02610.1016/j.ajo.2015.01.026 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.02210.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.022 ↗
29. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-30677810.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306778 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.11.01910.1016/j.ajo.2017.11.019 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.01.00310.1016/j.ajo.2019.01.003 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.06.01610.1016/j.ajo.2019.06.016 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.05.01610.1016/j.ajo.2013.05.016 ↗
34. 10.1002/smll.20200420510.1002/smll.202004205 ↗
35. 10.1172/JCI7539510.1172/JCI75395 ↗
36. 10.1073/pnas.200189611710.1073/pnas.2001896117 ↗
37. 10.1073/pnas.200125011710.1073/pnas.2001250117 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.nano.2012.05.01510.1016/j.nano.2012.05.015 ↗
39. 10.1002/btm2.1017310.1002/btm2.10173 ↗
40. 10.1167/iovs.12-992310.1167/iovs.12-9923 ↗
41. 10.1167/iovs.15-1710610.1167/iovs.15-17106 ↗
42. 10.1167/iovs.61.2.2310.1167/iovs.61.2.23 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.06010.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.060 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0645110.1021/acsnano.6b06451 ↗
45. 10.1002/jbm.a.3637610.1002/jbm.a.36376 ↗
46. Stamer W. D. · Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. · 1998 · 39 · 1804
47. 10.1016/j.exer.2011.12.01710.1016/j.exer.2011.12.017 ↗
48. 10.1038/s41467-020-20886-710.1038/s41467-020-20886-7 ↗
49. 10.1007/82_2014_36410.1007/82_2014_364 ↗
50. 10.1371/journal.pbio.100191210.1371/journal.pbio.1001912 ↗
51. 10.1002/adtp.20210006210.1002/adtp.202100062 ↗
52. 10.1016/0014-4835(89)90025-010.1016/0014-4835(89)90025-0 ↗
53. 10.1016/0040-4039(80)80255-310.1016/0040-4039(80)80255-3 ↗
54. 10.1167/iovs.12-1095010.1167/iovs.12-10950 ↗
55. 10.1038/nrd259110.1038/nrd2591 ↗
56. 10.1002/adfm.20190439910.1002/adfm.201904399 ↗
57. 10.1039/D1NR02188E10.1039/D1NR02188E ↗
58. 10.3791/5779310.3791/57793 ↗
59. 10.1039/c5ib00054h10.1039/c5ib00054h ↗
60. Hämäläinen K. M. · Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. · 1997 · 38 · 627
61. 10.1021/js980259410.1021/js9802594 ↗
62. 10.1007/s13346-016-0339-210.1007/s13346-016-0339-2 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.07910.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.079 ↗
64. 10.1038/gt.2011.14210.1038/gt.2011.142 ↗
65. 10.1038/s41433-019-0632-710.1038/s41433-019-0632-7 ↗
66. 10.1038/nmat108110.1038/nmat1081 ↗
67. 10.1021/nn302122h10.1021/nn302122h ↗
68. 10.1039/C7NR06779H10.1039/C7NR06779H ↗
69. 10.1021/acsami.8b0990610.1021/acsami.8b09906 ↗
70. 10.1039/C9NR10921H10.1039/C9NR10921H ↗