journal article·2021-11-10Open access

Using Helium Pycnometry to Study the Apparent Densities of Metal–Organic Frameworks

Gerald E. Decker, Eric D. Bloch

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 13· Issue 44

Abstract

When investigating the gas storage capacities of metal-organic frameworks, volumetric values are often reported based on crystallographic densities. Although it is widely accepted that Langmuir and BET surface areas of a given MOF can vary depending on the exact synthetic conditions used to prepare the materials, it is rare that deviations in density from the optimal crystallographic density are considered. The actual (apparent) densities of these materials are highly variable depending on the presence of defects, impurities, or multiple phases that arise during synthesis. The apparent density of specific samples, which represent an experimentally determined crystallographic density, can be measured with helium pycnometry where the skeletal density measured via pycnometry is easily converted to an apparent density. In the work reported here, apparent density was measured for 46 samples across a series of different structure types where experimentally measured density was consistently lower than crystallographic density, up to 30% in some cases. Subsequently, use of this technique allows for quantification of densities for those materials whose structures have not been crystallographically determined.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Machine Learning in Materials Science · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716 United States

Funding

Office of Science

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Annual Energy Outlook 2020. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/archive/aeo20/ (accessed 2021-01-04).
2. Assessment of BQ-9000 Biodiesel Properties for 2017. https://afdc.energy.gov/files/u/publication/bq-9000_2017__assessment.pdf (accessed 2021-03-18).
3. Electrification Futures Study: Scenarios of Power System Evolution and Infrastructure Development for the United States. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/72330.pdf (accessed 2021-03-18).
4. 10.1038/ncomms1491610.1038/ncomms14916 ↗
5. EIA. Natural Gas Explained, 2019. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/natural-gas/liquefied-natural-gas.php (accessed 2021-03-18).
6. DOE. Natural Gas Fuel Basics. https://afdc.energy.gov/fuels/natural_gas_basics.html (accessed 2021-03-18).
7. http://arpa-e.energy.gov/?q%20=arpa-e-programs/move (accessed 2021-01-04).
8. 10.1038/s41563-020-0751-310.1038/s41563-020-0751-3 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41598-020-61776-810.1038/s41598-020-61776-8 ↗
10. 10.1016/0008-6223(95)00128-X10.1016/0008-6223(95)00128-X ↗
11. 10.1023/A:100967383061910.1023/A:1009673830619 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0008-6223(01)00287-110.1016/S0008-6223(01)00287-1 ↗
13. 10.1021/ja077163910.1021/ja0771639 ↗
14. 10.1126/science.aaz888110.1126/science.aaz8881 ↗
15. 10.1039/C5EE01531F10.1039/C5EE01531F ↗
16. 10.1039/b911242a10.1039/b911242a ↗
17. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.09.01610.1016/j.micromeso.2007.09.016 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.0c1120010.1021/acsami.0c11200 ↗
19. 10.1039/C6CC07094A10.1039/C6CC07094A ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.03.16110.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.03.161 ↗
21. 10.1039/C8TA09227C10.1039/C8TA09227C ↗
22. 10.1038/nmat505010.1038/nmat5050 ↗
23. 10.1039/C6SC05602D10.1039/C6SC05602D ↗
24. 10.1038/s41467-019-10185-110.1038/s41467-019-10185-1 ↗
25. 10.1021/cm501859p10.1021/cm501859p ↗
26. 10.1039/C7TA11155J10.1039/C7TA11155J ↗
27. 10.1002/er.660810.1002/er.6608 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41467-018-03892-810.1038/s41467-018-03892-8 ↗
29. 10.1021/ja057003210.1021/ja0570032 ↗
30. 10.1021/jacs.7b0216110.1021/jacs.7b02161 ↗
31. 10.1039/c1ce05437f10.1039/c1ce05437f ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0011910.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00119 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsami.1c0015210.1021/acsami.1c00152 ↗
34. 10.1039/C4GC01861C10.1039/C4GC01861C ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.cgd.6b0177610.1021/acs.cgd.6b01776 ↗
36. 10.1002/adma.20170450110.1002/adma.201704501 ↗
37. 10.3389/fenrg.2016.0000910.3389/fenrg.2016.00009 ↗
38. 10.1007/s00339-016-9654-110.1007/s00339-016-9654-1 ↗
39. Webb, P. A. Volume and Density Determinations for Particle Technologists; Micromeritics Instrument Corporation, 2001; pp 1–16
40. Veenstra, M.; Purewal, J.; Xu, C.; Yang, J.; Blaser, R.; Sudik, A. C.; Siegel, D. J.; Ming, Y.; Liu, D.; Chi, H.; Gaab, M.; Müller, U. Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2014 Annual Merit Review Proceedings: Project ST010. Ford/BASF-SE/UM Activities in Support of the Hydrogen Storage Engineering Center of Excellence, U.S. Department of Energy. https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review14/st010_veenstra_2014_o.pdf. (accessed 2021-03-19).
41. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0373110.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03731 ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0138310.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01383 ↗
43. 10.1021/acsami.0c1090010.1021/acsami.0c10900 ↗
44. 10.1021/ja805795310.1021/ja8057953 ↗
45. 10.1021/ja209698f10.1021/ja209698f ↗
46. 10.1039/c3cc46105j10.1039/c3cc46105j ↗
47. 10.1039/C3SC52633J10.1039/C3SC52633J ↗
48. 10.1021/ja506230r10.1021/ja506230r ↗
49. 10.1002/anie.20045425010.1002/anie.200454250 ↗
50. 10.1039/B512169H10.1039/B512169H ↗
51. 10.1021/ja500330a10.1021/ja500330a ↗
52. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b0113010.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b01130 ↗
53. 10.1039/C3QI00093A10.1039/C3QI00093A ↗
54. 10.1039/c3ee42394h10.1039/c3ee42394h ↗
55. 10.1021/ja905723410.1021/ja9057234 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.12.00110.1016/j.micromeso.2011.12.001 ↗
57. 10.1002/anie.20046059210.1002/anie.200460592 ↗
58. 10.1039/C8SC05218B10.1039/C8SC05218B ↗
59. 10.1039/B704325B10.1039/B704325B ↗
60. 10.1021/cm901983a10.1021/cm901983a ↗
61. 10.1126/science.111627510.1126/science.1116275 ↗
62. 10.1002/anie.20090463710.1002/anie.200904637 ↗
63. 10.1039/C2CE25409C10.1039/C2CE25409C ↗