journal article·2024Open access

Extended siponimod release via low-porosity PLGA fibres: a comprehensive three-month in vitro evaluation for neovascular ocular diseases

Rasha A. Alshaikh, Krishnakumar Chullipalliyalil, Christian Waeber, Katie B. Ryan

Biomaterials Science· Volume 12· Issue 18

Abstract

Neovascular ocular diseases are among the most common causes of preventable or treatable vision loss. Their management involves lifelong, intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapeutics to inhibit neovascularization, the key pathological step in these diseases. Anti-VEGF products approved for ocular administration are expensive biological agents with limited stability and short half-life. Additionally, their therapeutic advantages are hindered by high treatment resistance, poor patient compliance and the need for frequent, invasive administration. Herein, we used electrospinning to develop a unique, non-porous, PLGA implant for the ocular delivery of siponimod to improve ocular neovascular disease management. Siponimod is an FDA-approved drug for multiple sclerosis with a novel indication as a potential ocular angiogenesis inhibitor. The electrospinning conditions were optimised to produce a microfibrous, PLGA matte that was cut and rolled into the desired implant size. Physical characterisation techniques (Raman, PXRD, DSC and FTIR) indicated siponimod was distributed uniformly within the electrospun fibres as a stabilised, amorphous, solid dispersion with a character modifying drug-polymer interaction. Siponimod dispersion and drug-polymer interactions contributed to the formation of smooth fibres, with reduced porous structures. The apparent reduced porosity, coupled with the drug's hydrophobic dispersion, afforded resistance to water penetration. This led to a slow, controlled, Higuchi-type drug diffusion, with ∼30% of the siponimod load released over 90 days. The released drug inhibited human retinal microvascular endothelial cell migration and did not affect the cells' metabolic activity at different time points. The electrospun implant was physically stable after incubation under stress conditions for three months. This novel siponimod intravitreal implant broadens the therapeutic possibilities for neovascular ocular diseases, representing a potential alternative to biological, anti-VEGF treatments due to lower financial and stability burdens. Additionally, siponimod interaction with PLGA provides a unique opportunity to sustain the drug release from the electrospun fibres, thereby reducing the frequency of intravitreal injection and improving patient adherence.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ocular Surface and Contact Lens · Corneal Surgery and Treatments · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt

Centre for Advanced Photonics & Process Analysis, Munster Technological University Cork, T12 P928 Cork, Ireland

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

SSPC The SFI Research Centre for Pharmaceuticals, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

Funding

Irish Research Council for Science, Engineering and Technology

References (80)

Show source-provided references
1. Lindekleiv · Acta Ophthalmol. · 2013 · 91 · 30710.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02399.x ↗
2. GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators · Lancet Global Health · 2021 · 9 · e14410.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7 ↗
3. Campochiaro · J. Mol. Med. · 2013 · 91 · 31110.1007/s00109-013-0993-5 ↗
4. Alshaikh · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2022 · 187 · 11434210.1016/J.ADDR.2022.114342 ↗
5. Sun · Drug Des., Dev. Ther. · 2016 · 185710.2147/DDDT.S97653 ↗
6. Sharma · Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. · 2023 · 64 · 2810.1167/IOVS.64.5.28 ↗
7. Nakamura · Cells · 2021 · 10 · 161710.3390/cells10071617 ↗
8. Ren · Exp. Eye Res. · 2016 · 145 · 35210.1016/J.EXER.2016.02.004 ↗
9. Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT) Research Group · Ophthalmology · 2012 · 119 · 138810.1016/j.ophtha.2012.03.053 ↗
10. Das · Expert Opin Emerg Drugs · 2023 · 28 · 20310.1080/14728214.2023.2259790 ↗
11. Niaudet · EMBO Mol. Med. · 2023 · 15 · e1664510.15252/EMMM.202216645 ↗
12. Gaengel · Dev. Cell · 2012 · 23 · 58710.1016/J.DEVCEL.2012.08.005 ↗
13. Liu · Mol. Ther.–Nucleic Acids · 2022 · 27 · 49110.1016/j.omtn.2021.12.019 ↗
14. Sorenson · Cells · 2022 · 11 · 96910.3390/CELLS11060969 ↗
15. Alshaikh · J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. · 2023 · 386 · 22410.1124/jpet.122.001529 ↗
16. Alshaikh · Br. J. Ophthalmol. · 2021 · 110.1136/BJOPHTHALMOL-2021-319115 ↗
17. Alshaikh · Mol. Pharm. · 2024 · 21 · 331010.1021/ACS.MOLPHARMACEUT.4C00063 ↗
18. Torres-Martinez · Curr Drug Deliv · 2018 · 15 · 136010.2174/1567201815666180723114326 ↗
19. Luraghi · J. Controlled Release · 2021 · 334 · 46310.1016/j.jconrel.2021.03.033 ↗
20. Wang · AAPS J. · 2021 · 23 · 110.1208/s12248-021-00611-y ↗
21. Tsujinaka · Nat. Commun. · 2020 · 11 · 110.1038/s41467-020-14340-x ↗
22. Feng · J. Controlled Release · 2019 · 302 · 1910.1016/j.jconrel.2019.03.020 ↗
23. Siafaka · J Drug Deliv Sci Technol · 2023 · 84 · 10456510.1016/J.JDDST.2023.104565 ↗
24. Mishra · Drug Discovery Today · 2023 · 28 · 10367610.1016/J.DRUDIS.2023.103676 ↗
25. Ghosal · Sci. Rep. · 2018 · 8 · 110.1038/s41598-018-23378-3 ↗
26. Rohani Shirvan · J. Ind. Text. · 2022 · 51 · 311S10.1177/15280837211027785 ↗
27. Chou · J. Controlled Release · 2015 · 220 · 58410.1016/j.jconrel.2015.09.008 ↗
28. Angkawinitwong · Acta Biomater. · 2017 · 64 · 12610.1016/j.actbio.2017.10.015 ↗
29. de Souza · J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. · 2018 · 29 · 17310.1007/s10856-018-6187-5 ↗
30. Guerra · Int. J. Pharm. · 2023 · 636 · 12280910.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.122809 ↗
31. Khalil · Nanomedicine · 2019 · 14 · 3310.2217/nnm-2018-0297 ↗
32. Qi · J. Mater. Chem. · 2010 · 20 · 1062210.1039/c0jm01328e ↗
33. ICH Topic Q 2 (R1) Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology Step 5 NOTE FOR GUIDANCE ON VALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES: TEXT AND METHODOLOGY (CPMP/ICH/381/95) APPROVAL BY CPMP November 1994 DATE FOR COMING INTO OPERATION, 1995 . https://www.emea.eu.int
34. Amsden · Mol. Pharm. · 2016 · 13 · 300410.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6b00358 ↗
35. Makadia · Polymers · 2011 · 3 · 137710.3390/POLYM3031377 ↗
36. Hodge · Science · 1979 · 267 · 194510.1126/science.267.5206.1945 ↗
37. Sartawi · Int. J. Pharm. · 2020 · 590 · 11995610.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119956 ↗
38. Haider · BioMed Res. Int. · 2014 · 2014 · 110.1155/2014/308306 ↗
39. Alshaikh · Int. J. Pharm. · 2019 · 563 · 39510.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.04.024 ↗
40. Arjunan · Spectrochim. Acta, Part A · 2011 · 79 · 24510.1016/j.saa.2011.02.050 ↗
41. Kappos · JAMA Neurol. · 2016 · 73 · 108910.1001/JAMANEUROL.2016.1451 ↗
42. Dash · Acta Pol. Pharm. · 2010 · 67 · 217
43. Siepmann · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2012 · 64 · 16310.1016/j.addr.2012.09.028 ↗
44. Vincelette · J. Biomed. Opt. · 2008 · 13 · 05400510.1117/1.2978066 ↗
45. McKee · Macromolecules · 2004 · 37 · 176010.1021/ma035689h ↗
46. Casasola · Polymer · 2014 · 55 · 472810.1016/j.polymer.2014.06.032 ↗
47. Xie · Pharm. Res. · 2006 · 23 · 181710.1007/s11095-006-9036-z ↗
48. Krucińska · Autex Res. J. · 2013 · 13 · 5710.2478/v10304-012-0027-3 ↗
49. Xie · Macromol. Rapid Commun. · 2008 · 29 · 177510.1002/marc.200800381 ↗
50. Zamani · J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. · 2013 · 24 · 155110.1007/s10856-013-4905-6 ↗
51. Megelski · Macromolecules · 2002 · 35 · 845610.1021/ma020444a ↗
52. Nezarati · Tissue Eng., Part C · 2013 · 19 · 81010.1089/ten.tec.2012.0671 ↗
53. Ranjbar-Mohammadi · Mater. Sci. Eng., C · 2016 · 58 · 52110.1016/j.msec.2015.08.066 ↗
54. Abou-ElNour · J. Controlled Release · 2019 · 309 · 12510.1016/J.JCONREL.2019.07.030 ↗
55. Jiang · Int. J. Nanomed. · 2020 · 15 · 937310.2147/IJN.S272750 ↗
56. Taepaiboon · Nanotechnology · 2006 · 17 · 231710.1088/0957-4484/17/9/041 ↗
57. Jusu · Sci. Rep. · 2020 · 10 · 110.1038/s41598-020-71129-0 ↗
58. Chou · J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. · 2017 · 65 · 72410.1016/J.JMBBM.2016.09.004 ↗
59. Xu · J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part B · 2017 · 105 · 169210.1002/jbm.b.33648 ↗
60. Heredia · PLoS One · 2022 · 17 · e026482510.1371/journal.pone.0264825 ↗
61. Costa · Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. · 2001 · 13 · 12310.1016/S0928-0987(01)00095-1 ↗
62. Higuchi · J. Pharm. Sci. · 1961 · 50 · 87410.1002/JPS.2600501018 ↗
63. Fredenberg · Int. J. Pharm. · 2011 · 415 · 3410.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.05.049 ↗
64. Kim · J. Controlled Release · 2004 · 98 · 11510.1016/j.jconrel.2004.04.020 ↗
65. Lee · Chem. Eng. Sci. · 2009 · 64 · 434110.1016/j.ces.2009.07.016 ↗
66. Nguyen · Int. J. Pharm. · 2012 · 439 · 29610.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.09.019 ↗
67. Ajalloueian · BioMed Res. Int. · 2014 · 2014 · 47528010.1155/2014/475280 ↗
68. Lembach · Langmuir · 2010 · 26 · 951610.1021/la100031d ↗
69. Clarke · Langmuir · 2002 · 18 · 298010.1021/la0117810 ↗
70. Carson · Pharm. Res. · 2016 · 33 · 12510.1007/s11095-015-1769-0 ↗
71. Duan · J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed. · 2007 · 18 · 9510.1163/156856207779146105 ↗
72. Blackwood · Biomaterials · 2008 · 29 · 309110.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.037 ↗
73. Li · J. Controlled Release · 1996 · 40 · 4110.1016/0168-3659(95)00138-7 ↗
74. Siegel · Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. · 2006 · 64 · 28710.1016/j.ejpb.2006.06.009 ↗
75. Huang · NPG Asia Mater. · 2013 · 5 · e5410.1038/am.2013.26 ↗
76. Van den Mooter · Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. · 2001 · 12 · 26110.1016/S0928-0987(00)00173-1 ↗
77. Crowley · Pharm. Res. · 2003 · 20 · 141710.1023/a:1025706110520 ↗
78. Bhugra · J. Pharm. Sci. · 2008 · 97 · 132910.1002/JPS.21138 ↗
79. Theil · Mol. Pharm. · 2017 · 14 · 463610.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00735 ↗
80. Theil · Mol. Pharm. · 2017 · 14 · 18310.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6b00783 ↗