journal article·2022-11-30

Surface Analysis of Pristine and Cycled NMC/Graphite Lithium-Ion Battery Electrodes: Addressing the Measurement Challenges

Sofia Marchesini, Benjamen P. Reed, Helen Jones, Lidija Matjacic, Timothy E. Rosser, Yundong Zhou, Barry Brennan, Mariavitalia Tiddia, Rhodri Jervis, Melanie. J. Loveridge, Rinaldo Raccichini, Juyeon Park, Andrew J. Wain, Gareth Hinds, Ian S. Gilmore, Alexander G. Shard, Andrew J. Pollard

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 14· Issue 47
Publisher page

Abstract

Lithium-ion batteries are the most ubiquitous energy storage devices in our everyday lives. However, their energy storage capacity fades over time due to chemical and structural changes in their components, via different degradation mechanisms. Understanding and mitigating these degradation mechanisms is key to reducing capacity fade, thereby enabling improvement in the performance and lifetime of Li-ion batteries, supporting the energy transition to renewables and electrification. In this endeavor, surface analysis techniques are commonly employed to characterize the chemistry and structure at reactive interfaces, where most changes are observed as batteries age. However, battery electrodes are complex systems containing unstable compounds, with large heterogeneities in material properties. Moreover, different degradation mechanisms can affect multiple material properties and occur simultaneously, meaning that a range of complementary techniques must be utilized to obtain a complete picture of electrode degradation. The combination of these issues and the lack of standard measurement protocols and guidelines for data interpretation can lead to a lack of trust in data. Herein, we discuss measurement challenges that affect several key surface analysis techniques being used for Li-ion battery degradation studies: focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry. We provide recommendations for each technique to improve reproducibility and reduce uncertainty in the analysis of NMC/graphite Li-ion battery electrodes. We also highlight some key measurement issues that should be addressed in future investigations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Semiconductor materials and devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington TW11 0LW, U.K.

Electrochemical Innovation Lab, Department of Chemical Engineering, University College of London, London SW7 2AZ, U.K.

The Faraday Institution, Quad One, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0RA, U.K.

Electrochemical Materials Group, Warwick Manufacturing Group, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K.

Funding

Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, UK Government · Faraday Institution

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. Faraday battery challenge: Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund-GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/faraday-battery-challenge-industrial-strategy-challenge-fund (accessed March 30, 2020).
2. 10.1038/s41560-018-0107-210.1038/s41560-018-0107-2 ↗
3. 10.1039/d1cp00359c10.1039/d1cp00359c ↗
4. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0436510.1021/acsnano.9b04365 ↗
5. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab905010.1149/1945-7111/ab9050 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0037910.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00379 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.10510.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.105 ↗
8. 10.1149/2.1211609jes10.1149/2.1211609jes ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.05.07910.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.05.079 ↗
10. 10.1149/2.0061701jes10.1149/2.0061701jes ↗
11. 10.1039/c3ta10586e10.1039/c3ta10586e ↗
12. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.12410.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.124 ↗
13. 10.1002/aenm.20200080610.1002/aenm.202000806 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0969810.1021/acs.jpcc.5b09698 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.10310.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.103 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0073310.1021/acsenergylett.9b00733 ↗
17. 10.1002/aenm.20190273110.1002/aenm.201902731 ↗
18. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac132d10.1149/1945-7111/ac132d ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.02.02810.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.02.028 ↗
20. 10.1002/adfm.20110015710.1002/adfm.201100157 ↗
21. 10.1039/c4fd00079j10.1039/c4fd00079j ↗
22. 10.1016/s0378-7753(01)00908-910.1016/s0378-7753(01)00908-9 ↗
23. 10.1146/annurev-anchem-061318-11530310.1146/annurev-anchem-061318-115303 ↗
24. 10.1149/2.0631507jes10.1149/2.0631507jes ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.12.03410.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.12.034 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.490512810.1063/1.4905128 ↗
27. 10.3934/matersci.2018.4.65010.3934/matersci.2018.4.650 ↗
28. 10.1021/cr800344k10.1021/cr800344k ↗
29. 10.1149/2.0361501jes10.1149/2.0361501jes ↗
30. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.06.04010.1016/j.electacta.2010.06.040 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0320210.1021/acs.chemmater.9b03202 ↗
32. 10.3389/fenrg.2018.0008210.3389/fenrg.2018.00082 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b1167710.1021/acs.jpcc.9b11677 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.05510.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.055 ↗
35. Weatherup, R. Observing Degradation at Electrode-Electrolyte Interfaces in Li-Ion Batteries. Proc. SPIE 11883, Photoemission Spectroscopy for Materials Analysis; SPIE, 2021; Vol. 11883, p 1188306.10.1117/12.2604797 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.09.04910.1016/j.carbon.2012.09.049 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.00810.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.008 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.06210.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.062 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.11410.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.114 ↗
40. 10.1016/s0378-7753(03)00277-510.1016/s0378-7753(03)00277-5 ↗
41. 10.1116/6.000068510.1116/6.0000685 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0040610.1021/acsaem.8b00406 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0351810.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03518 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.12.22310.1016/j.apsusc.2016.12.223 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.06.12910.1016/j.electacta.2014.06.129 ↗
46. 10.1116/6.000067410.1116/6.0000674 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.01.08310.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.01.083 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.09.09010.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.09.090 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.05.02910.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.05.029 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.05110.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.051 ↗
51. 10.1002/sia.74018051010.1002/sia.740180510 ↗
52. 10.1021/jp405158m10.1021/jp405158m ↗
53. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac035910.1149/1945-7111/ac0359 ↗
54. 10.1002/sia.540610.1002/sia.5406 ↗
55. 10.1116/1.514139510.1116/1.5141395 ↗
56. 10.1063/1.9027110.1063/1.90271 ↗
57. Roberts, A.; Counsell, J. D. P.; Blomfield, C.; Pearse, A. Argon Ion Gas Cluster Depth Profiling of Li Ion Thin-Film Battery Materials, 2017.
58. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14769910.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147699 ↗
59. 10.1088/1361-648x/abeacd10.1088/1361-648x/abeacd ↗
60. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14863510.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148635 ↗
61. Gibson J. S. · Faraday Discuss. · 2022 · 236 · 26710.1039/D1FD00118C ↗
62. 10.1021/acsami.0c1850510.1021/acsami.0c18505 ↗
63. 10.1016/s0378-7753(01)00505-510.1016/s0378-7753(01)00505-5 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.14426610.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144266 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.06510.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.065 ↗
66. 10.1007/s13361-011-0201-110.1007/s13361-011-0201-1 ↗
67. 10.1038/s41598-018-33608-310.1038/s41598-018-33608-3 ↗
68. 10.1038/ncomms1458910.1038/ncomms14589 ↗
69. 10.1039/c3ja50292a10.1039/c3ja50292a ↗
70. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c0108910.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01089 ↗