journal article·2021-09-29Open access

Insights into Paraben Adsorption by Metal–Organic Frameworks for Analytical Applications

Providencia González-Hernández, Adrián Gutiérrez-Serpa, Ana B. Lago, Laura Estévez, Juan H. Ayala, Verónica Pino, Jorge Pasán

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 13· Issue 38

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are attractive materials used as sorbents in analytical microextraction applications for contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) from environmental liquid matrices. The demanding specs for a sorbent in the analytical application can be comprehensively studied by considering the interactions of the target analytes with the frameworks by the use of single-crystal X-ray diffraction, computational analysis, and adsorption studies, including the kinetic ones. The current study intends a better understanding of the interactions of target CECs (particularly, propylparaben (PPB) as a model) and three Zn-based layered pillared MOFs: CIM-81 [Zn2(tz)2(bdc)] (Htz = 1,2,4-triazole and H2bdc = 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid) and their amino derivatives [Zn2(NH2-tz)2(bdc)] CIM-82 and [Zn2(tz)2(NH2-bdc)] CIM-83 (NH2-Htz = 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole and NH2-H2bdc = 2-amino-1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid). The crystal structures of the two solvate compounds (dma@CIM-81 (dma = dimethylacetamide) and acetone@CIM-81) were solved by single-crystal X-ray diffraction to determine the points of interaction between the framework and the guest molecules. They also served as a starting point for the computational modeling of the PPB@CIM-81 compound, showing that up to two PPB molecules can be hosted in one of the pores, while only one can be trapped in the second pore type, leading to a maximum theoretical capacity of 291.9 mg g-1. This value is close to the value obtained by the adsorption isotherm experiment for CIM-81 (283 mg g-1). This value is, by far, higher than those previously reported for other materials for the removal of PPB from water, and also higher than the experimental values obtained for CIM-82 (54 mg g-1) and CIM-83 (153 mg g-1). The kinetics of adsorption is not very fast, with uptake of about 40% in 3 h, although a 70% release in methanol is achieved in 1 h. In addition, a further comparison of performance in analytical microextraction (requiring only 10 mg of CIM-81) was carried out together with chromatographic analysis to support all insights attained, with the method being able to monitor CECs as low as μg L-1 levels in complex environmental water samples, thus performing successfully for water monitoring even in multicomponent scenarios.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Radioactive element chemistry and processing · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratorio de Materiales para Análisis Químico (MAT4LL), Departamento de Química, Unidad Departamental de Química Analítica, Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), La Laguna, Tenerife 38206, Spain

Unidad de Investigación de Bioanalítica y Medioambiente, Instituto Universitario de Enfermedades Tropicales y Salud Pública, Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), La Laguna, Tenerife 38206, Spain

Laboratorio de Materiales para Análisis Químico (MAT4LL), Departamento de Química, Unidad Departamental de Química Inorgánica, Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), La Laguna, Tenerife 38206, Spain

Departamento de Química Física, Facultad de Química, Universidade de Vigo, Vigo, Galicia 36310, Spain

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovaci??n · Universidad de La Laguna · Xunta de Galicia · Agencia Canaria de Investigaci??n, Innovaci??n y Sociedad de la Informaci??n

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/cosmetics701001310.3390/cosmetics7010013 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.14101610.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141016 ↗
3. 10.1002/jssc.20190077610.1002/jssc.201900776 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.trac.2019.07.01210.1016/j.trac.2019.07.012 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.trac.2017.03.00210.1016/j.trac.2017.03.002 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.microc.2020.10525010.1016/j.microc.2020.105250 ↗
7. Yaghi O. M. · 201910.1002/9783527821099 ↗
8. 10.1039/C4CS90059F10.1039/C4CS90059F ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0044110.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00441 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0079710.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00797 ↗
11. 10.1126/science.123044410.1126/science.1230444 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ccr.2019.02.03210.1016/j.ccr.2019.02.032 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.09.00910.1016/j.ccr.2018.09.009 ↗
14. 10.1517/17425247.2013.74158310.1517/17425247.2013.741583 ↗
15. 10.1039/C8TA00264A10.1039/C8TA00264A ↗
16. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.4510.1038/natrevmats.2017.45 ↗
17. 10.1002/aenm.20160129610.1002/aenm.201601296 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41557-019-0257-210.1038/s41557-019-0257-2 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.09.04610.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.09.046 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c0082310.1021/acs.langmuir.1c00823 ↗
21. 10.1039/D0DT03637D10.1039/D0DT03637D ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.1c0883310.1021/acsami.1c08833 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c0329610.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c03296 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41467-019-11912-410.1038/s41467-019-11912-4 ↗
25. 10.1021/jacs.8b1252510.1021/jacs.8b12525 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c0041410.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c00414 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.7b1344310.1021/acsami.7b13443 ↗
28. 10.1039/C8TA03306D10.1039/C8TA03306D ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.1c0015210.1021/acsami.1c00152 ↗
30. 10.1002/chem.20140649510.1002/chem.201406495 ↗
31. 10.1039/c3ce00049d10.1039/c3ce00049d ↗
32. 10.1016/j.poly.2019.05.00310.1016/j.poly.2019.05.003 ↗
33. 10.1039/c3ce26800d10.1039/c3ce26800d ↗
34. 10.1002/cplu.20160015610.1002/cplu.201600156 ↗
35. 10.1021/ja900555r10.1021/ja900555r ↗
36. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.03.00610.1016/j.micromeso.2019.03.006 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0048710.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00487 ↗
38. 10.1107/S160057671901409210.1107/S1600576719014092 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0014810.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00148 ↗
40. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0151810.1021/acs.chemmater.0c01518 ↗
41. 10.1021/jp412588f10.1021/jp412588f ↗
42. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-510.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
43. 10.1016/0168-3659(87)90034-410.1016/0168-3659(87)90034-4 ↗
44. 10.5004/dwt.2020.2598510.5004/dwt.2020.25985 ↗
45. 10.1039/C8RA03408G10.1039/C8RA03408G ↗
46. 10.3390/ijms1109245910.3390/ijms11092459 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.10101110.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101011 ↗
48. 10.1007/s10450-019-00120-710.1007/s10450-019-00120-7 ↗
49. 10.3390/molecules2404069010.3390/molecules24040690 ↗
50. 10.1017/S088571561300090010.1017/S0885715613000900 ↗
51. 10.1002/jcc.2049510.1002/jcc.20495 ↗
52. 10.1021/cr990400910.1021/cr9904009 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b0161110.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b01611 ↗
54. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Li, X.; Caricato, M.; Marenich, A. V.; Bloino, J.; Janesko, B. G.; Gomperts, R.; Mennucci, B.; Hratchian, H. P.; Ortiz, J. V.; Izmaylov, A. F.; Sonnenberg, J. L.; Williams; Ding, F.; Lipparini, F.; Egidi, F.; Goings, J.; Peng, B.; Petrone, A.; Henderson, T.; Ranasinghe, D.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Gao, J.; Rega, N.; Zheng, G.; Liang, W.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Vreven, T.; Throssell, K.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Peralta, J. E.; Ogliaro, F.; Bearpark, M. J.; Heyd, J. J.; Brothers, E. N.; Kudin, K. N.; Staroverov, V. N.; Keith, T. A.; Kobayashi, R.; Normand, J.; Raghavachari, K.; Rendell, A. P.; Burant, J. C.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Cossi, M.; Millam, J. M.; Klene, M.; Adamo, C.; Cammi, R.; Ochterski, J. W.; Martin, R. L.; Morokuma, K.; Farkas, O.; Foresman, J. B.; Fox, D. J. Gaussian 09, revision D.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2016.