journal article·2020-12-23Open access

Bioactivation of Encapsulation Membranes Reduces Fibrosis and Enhances Cell Survival

Richard P. Tan, Nicole Hallahan, Elena Kosobrodova, Praveesuda L. Michael, Fei Wei, Miguel Santos, Yuen Ting Lam, Alex H. P. Chan, Yin Xiao, Marcela M. M. Bilek, Peter Thorn, Steven G. Wise

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 12· Issue 51

Abstract

Encapsulation devices are an emerging barrier technology designed to prevent the immunorejection of replacement cells in regenerative therapies for intractable diseases. However, traditional polymers used in current devices are poor substrates for cell attachment and induce fibrosis upon implantation, impacting long-term therapeutic cell viability. Bioactivation of polymer surfaces improves local host responses to materials, and here we make the first step toward demonstrating the utility of this approach to improve cell survival within encapsulation implants. Using therapeutic islet cells as an exemplar cell therapy, we show that internal surface coatings improve islet cell attachment and viability, while distinct external coatings modulate local foreign body responses. Using plasma surface functionalization (plasma immersion ion implantation (PIII)), we employ hollow fiber semiporous poly(ether sulfone) (PES) encapsulation membranes and coat the internal surfaces with the extracellular matrix protein fibronectin (FN) to enhance islet cell attachment. Separately, the external fiber surface is coated with the anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-4 (IL-4) to polarize local macrophages to an M2 (anti-inflammatory) phenotype, muting the fibrotic response. To demonstrate the power of our approach, bioluminescent murine islet cells were loaded into dual FN/IL-4-coated fibers and evaluated in a mouse back model for 14 days. Dual FN/IL-4 fibers showed striking reductions in immune cell accumulation and elevated levels of the M2 macrophage phenotype, consistent with the suppression of fibrotic encapsulation and enhanced angiogenesis. These changes led to markedly enhanced islet cell survival and importantly to functional integration of the implant with the host vasculature. Dual FN/IL-4 surface coatings drive multifaceted improvements in islet cell survival and function, with significant implications for improving clinical translation of therapeutic cell-containing macroencapsulation implants.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Pancreatic function and diabetes · Diabetes and associated disorders · Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physiology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia

Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, John Hopkins Drive, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia

Applied Plasma and Physics, A28, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Physics Road, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia

Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4000, Australia

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council · Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Australia · Diabetes Australia

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nrd.2016.23210.1038/nrd.2016.232 ↗
2. 10.1007/s00125-013-2921-110.1007/s00125-013-2921-1 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.addr.2013.07.01810.1016/j.addr.2013.07.018 ↗
4. 10.2337/db17-006510.2337/db17-0065 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41551-018-0275-110.1038/s41551-018-0275-1 ↗
6. 10.1038/nm.403010.1038/nm.4030 ↗
7. 10.1002/jbm.a.3570610.1002/jbm.a.35706 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matbio.2008.08.00110.1016/j.matbio.2008.08.001 ↗
9. 10.1073/pnas.140221611110.1073/pnas.1402216111 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.04010.1016/j.cell.2014.09.040 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0123910.1021/acsnano.7b01239 ↗
12. 10.1038/nbt.303310.1038/nbt.3033 ↗
13. 10.1002/jbm.82029120810.1002/jbm.820291208 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.addr.2019.05.00210.1016/j.addr.2019.05.002 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.03.01810.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.03.018 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41598-018-23862-w10.1038/s41598-018-23862-w ↗
17. 10.1177/09636897000090011410.1177/096368970000900114 ↗
18. 10.3727/00000000578398323210.3727/000000005783983232 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.05110.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.051 ↗
20. 10.1073/pnas.110327710810.1073/pnas.1103277108 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.7b1554510.1021/acsami.7b15545 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.03510.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.035 ↗
23. 10.1242/jcs.18511610.1242/jcs.185116 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jacbts.2018.10.00410.1016/j.jacbts.2018.10.004 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.01.04210.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.01.042 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b0020810.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00208 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.501034610.1063/1.5010346 ↗
28. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.01207910.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012079 ↗
29. 10.1155/2015/81646010.1155/2015/816460 ↗
30. 10.1111/micc.1225910.1111/micc.12259 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.05910.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.059 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.01.00610.1016/j.actbio.2011.01.006 ↗
33. 10.1161/01.ATV.18.3.43210.1161/01.ATV.18.3.432 ↗
34. 10.1023/A:102495133026510.1023/A:1024951330265 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.01910.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.019 ↗
36. 10.1007/s10456-013-9381-610.1007/s10456-013-9381-6 ↗
37. 10.1111/boc.20160007610.1111/boc.201600076 ↗
38. 10.1080/19382014.2015.102440510.1080/19382014.2015.1024405 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.03.09710.1016/j.apsusc.2014.03.097 ↗
40. 10.3727/09636890978823719510.3727/096368909788237195 ↗
41. 10.1089/ten.tea.2007.023810.1089/ten.tea.2007.0238 ↗
42. 10.1038/nature1862410.1038/nature18624 ↗
43. 10.3727/096368912X65988010.3727/096368912X659880 ↗
44. 10.1007/s00125-006-0536-510.1007/s00125-006-0536-5 ↗
45. 10.1074/jbc.M80213920010.1074/jbc.M802139200 ↗
46. 10.1182/blood-2007-08-10859710.1182/blood-2007-08-108597 ↗
47. 10.1159/00034713210.1159/000347132 ↗
48. 10.1002/jbm.a.3611310.1002/jbm.a.36113 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jim.2015.03.01310.1016/j.jim.2015.03.013 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.00210.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.002 ↗
51. 10.1182/blood-2011-04-34870610.1182/blood-2011-04-348706 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.00410.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 ↗
53. 10.1152/ajpheart.00496.201410.1152/ajpheart.00496.2014 ↗
54. 10.1124/jpet.113.20731610.1124/jpet.113.207316 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.04.02210.1016/j.ydbio.2012.04.022 ↗
56. 10.1073/pnas.111356010910.1073/pnas.1113560109 ↗
57. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2010.01276.x10.1111/j.1463-1326.2010.01276.x ↗
58. 10.1007/s00268-006-0719-810.1007/s00268-006-0719-8 ↗
59. 10.3727/00000000178398669310.3727/000000001783986693 ↗
60. 10.1186/s13287-018-0824-210.1186/s13287-018-0824-2 ↗
61. 10.1042/BSR2018056310.1042/BSR20180563 ↗