journal article·2018-08-15

Proton-Rocking-Chair-Type Redox Capacitors Based on Indium Tin Oxide Electrodes with Multilayer Films Containing Ru Complexes

Kai Yoshikawa, Daisuke Motoyama, Yusuke Hiruma, Hiroaki Ozawa, Shusaku Nagano, Masa-aki Haga

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 10· Issue 32
Publisher page

Abstract

A rechargeable proton-rocking-chair-type redox capacitor was fabricated using scalable layer-by-layer-(LbL)-assembled films composed of two dinuclear Ru complexes that exhibit proton-coupled electron-transfer (PCET) reactions with different Ru(II/III) redox potentials (RuNH–OH and RuCH–OH). RuNH–OH and RuCH–OH contain different coordination environments that involve two phosphonate linker ligands at both ends and bridging 2,6,2′,6′-tetrakis(benzimidazol-2-yl)-4,4′-bipyridine or 1,3,1′,3′-tetrakis(benzimidazol-2-yl)-5,5′-biphenyl ligands, respectively. The molecular units were assembled onto indium tin oxide (ITO) electrodes by complexation between the phosphonate groups and zirconium(IV) ions. The LbL growing process of these multilayer films was monitored by electrochemical or UV–vis spectroscopic measurements. The thus obtained LbL films on the ITO electrodes showed PCET reactions at different potentials, depending on the bridging ligands. The introduction of cyclometalated Ru–C bonds in the bridging ligand of RuCH–OH led to the stabilization of the ruthenium(III) oxidation state, and therefore, RuCH–OH exhibited lower pKa values for the imino N–H protons in the bridging benzimidazole groups compared to those of the corresponding RuNH–OH complex. The proton movements that accompany the redox reaction in the Ru multilayer films on the ITO electrode were confirmed using a pH indicator probe. For the performance test of a proton-rocking-chair-type redox capacitor, a two-electrode system composed of RuNH–OH and RuCH–OH multilayer films on ITO electrodes was examined in an aqueous solution of NaClO4. Under galvanostatic conditions, stable, reversible, and repeatable charging/discharging processes occurred. The capacitance increased with an increasing number of LbL layers. For comparison, a similar redox capacitor composed of two RuNMe–OH and RuCMe–OH analogues, in which all four imino N–H protons on the benzimidazole moieties are protected by N–Me groups, was constructed and examined. In these complexes, the capacitance decreased by 77% compared to the PCET-type capacitor composed of a cell containing RuNH–OH and RuCH–OH; this result strongly suggests that the proton movement plays a more important role for the charge storage than the anion movement. In such LbL films composed of Ru complexes that exhibit PCET-type redox reactions, the capacitance is drastically improved with an increasing number of layers and using protons as charge carriers.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Chuo University, 1-13-27 Kasuga, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 112-8551, Japan

Nagoya University Venture Business Laboratory, Furo-cho, Chikusa, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science · Institute of Science and Engineering, Chuo University · Promotion and Mutual Aid Corporation for Private Schools of Japan

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/cr100290v10.1021/cr100290v ↗
2. 10.1021/cr020730k10.1021/cr020730k ↗
3. 10.1021/nl400921p10.1021/nl400921p ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.17010.1016/j.cej.2017.09.170 ↗
5. 10.1038/ncomms400710.1038/ncomms4007 ↗
6. 10.1039/c6ra21500a10.1039/c6ra21500a ↗
7. 10.1038/ncomms881810.1038/ncomms8818 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.6b0626410.1021/acsami.6b06264 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.01810.1016/j.joule.2017.08.018 ↗
10. 10.1039/b618139m10.1039/b618139m ↗
11. 10.1007/s11671-009-9508-210.1007/s11671-009-9508-2 ↗
12. 10.1016/s0378-7753(96)02474-310.1016/s0378-7753(96)02474-3 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.192.4244.112610.1126/science.192.4244.1126 ↗
14. 10.1021/ja309143810.1021/ja3091438 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.6b0836710.1021/acsami.6b08367 ↗
16. 10.1038/srep0359110.1038/srep03591 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.06.09610.1016/j.carbon.2016.06.096 ↗
18. 10.1021/jacs.7b0015910.1021/jacs.7b00159 ↗
19. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0194710.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01947 ↗
20. 10.1021/am400555710.1021/am4005557 ↗
21. 10.1039/c7cc07490e10.1039/c7cc07490e ↗
22. 10.1038/191144a010.1038/191144a0 ↗
23. 10.1246/bcsj.73.60710.1246/bcsj.73.607 ↗
24. 10.1021/cr050003010.1021/cr0500030 ↗
25. 10.1021/cr200177j10.1021/cr200177j ↗
26. 10.1021/ja511788f10.1021/ja511788f ↗
27. 10.1038/3311610.1038/33116 ↗
28. 10.1021/ar980130110.1021/ar9801301 ↗
29. 10.1021/ar200301310.1021/ar2003013 ↗
30. 10.1002/cctc.20170099510.1002/cctc.201700995 ↗
31. 10.1021/ic990934s10.1021/ic990934s ↗
32. 10.1039/dt993000247710.1039/dt9930002477 ↗
33. 10.1039/dt994000026310.1039/dt9940000263 ↗
34. 10.1002/chem.20110007410.1002/chem.201100074 ↗
35. 10.1039/b300130j10.1039/b300130j ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b0051810.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00518 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.03.02210.1016/j.ccr.2007.03.022 ↗
38. 10.1002/chem.20170438110.1002/chem.201704381 ↗
39. 10.1002/chem.20150359110.1002/chem.201503591 ↗
40. 10.1021/la801293e10.1021/la801293e ↗
41. 10.1021/om500142t10.1021/om500142t ↗
42. 10.1021/ic50218a06210.1021/ic50218a062 ↗
43. 10.1021/ic201688510.1021/ic2016885 ↗
44. 10.1021/cr00014a00610.1021/cr00014a006 ↗
45. 10.1039/c3dt51484f10.1039/c3dt51484f ↗
46. 10.1016/s0378-7753(00)00474-210.1016/s0378-7753(00)00474-2 ↗
47. 10.1021/ic300054j10.1021/ic300054j ↗