journal article·2024Open access

Microstructured silk fiber scaffolds with enhanced stretchability

Martina Viola, Gerardo Cedillo-Servin, Anne Metje van Genderen, Isabelle Imhof, Paula Vena, Marko Mihajlovic, Susanna Piluso, Jos Malda, Tina Vermonden, Miguel Castilho

Biomaterials Science· Volume 12· Issue 20

Abstract

Despite extensive research, current methods for creating three-dimensional (3D) silk fibroin (SF) scaffolds lack control over molecular rearrangement, particularly in the formation of β-sheet nanocrystals that severely embrittle SF, as well as hierarchical fiber organization at both micro- and macroscale. Here, we introduce a fabrication process based on electrowriting of aqueous SF solutions followed by post-processing using an aqueous solution of sodium dihydrogen phosphate (NaH2PO4). This approach enables gelation of SF chains via controlled β-sheet formation and partial conservation of compliant random coil structures. Moreover, this process allows for precise architecture control in microfiber scaffolds, enabling the creation of 3D flat and tubular macro-geometries with square-based and crosshatch microarchitectures, featuring inter-fiber distances of 400 μm and ∼97% open porosity. Remarkably, the crosslinked printed structures demonstrated a balanced coexistence of β-sheet and random coil conformations, which is uncommon for organic solvent-based crosslinking methods. This synergy of printing and post-processing yielded stable scaffolds with high compliance (modulus = 0.5-15 MPa) and the ability to support elastic cyclic loading up to 20% deformation. Furthermore, the printed constructs supported in vitro adherence and growth of human renal epithelial and endothelial cells with viability above 95%. These cells formed homogeneous monolayers that aligned with the fiber direction and deposited type-IV collagen as a specific marker of healthy extracellular matrix, indicating that both cell types attach, proliferate, and organize their own microenvironment within the SF scaffolds. These findings represent a significant development in fabricating organized stable SF scaffolds with unique microfiber structures and mechanical and biological properties that make them highly promising for tissue engineering applications.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Materials and Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Division of Pharmaceutics, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Division of Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

SentryX B.V., Utrecht, The Netherlands

Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme · H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions · Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Lujerdean · Insects · 2022 · 13 · 28610.3390/insects13030286 ↗
2. Koh · Prog. Polym. Sci. · 2015 · 46 · 8610.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.02.001 ↗
3. Tandon · Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. · 2020 · 59 · 1759310.1021/acs.iecr.0c02195 ↗
4. Belbéoch · Environ. Chem. Lett. · 2021 · 19 · 173710.1007/s10311-020-01147-x ↗
5. Asakura · Biomacromolecules · 2006 · 8 · 17510.1021/bm060874z ↗
6. Liu · Compos. Commun. · 2019 · 13 · 8510.1016/j.coco.2019.03.004 ↗
7. Yan · Biomacromolecules · 2009 · 11 · 110.1021/bm900840h ↗
8. Chung · Fibers Polym. · 2014 · 15 · 15310.1007/s12221-014-0153-8 ↗
9. Peng · Macromol. Mater. Eng. · 2017 · 302 · 170010210.1002/mame.201700102 ↗
10. Kim · Polym. J. · 2003 · 35 · 18510.1295/polymj.35.185 ↗
11. Wang · Macromolecules · 2004 · 37 · 685610.1021/ma048988v ↗
12. Amiraliyan · Polym. Sci., Ser. A · 2010 · 52 · 40710.1134/S0965545X10040097 ↗
13. Catto · Mater. Sci. Eng., C · 2015 · 54 · 10110.1016/j.msec.2015.05.003 ↗
14. Yazawa · J. Chem. Soc. Jpn. · 1960 · 63 · 1428
15. Liivak · Macromolecules · 1998 · 31 · 294710.1021/ma971626l ↗
16. Yao · Macromolecules · 2001 · 35 · 610.1021/ma011335j ↗
17. Um · Int. J. Biol. Macromol. · 2001 · 29 · 9110.1016/S0141-8130(01)00159-3 ↗
18. Zuo · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2007 · 106 · 5310.1002/app.26653 ↗
19. Kim · Biomaterials · 2005 · 26 · 277510.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.044 ↗
20. Zhou · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2005 · 109 · 1693710.1021/jp050883m ↗
21. Hai · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2023 · 140 · e5334910.1002/app.53349 ↗
22. Rising · Nat. Chem. Biol. · 2015 · 11 · 30910.1038/nchembio.1789 ↗
23. Foo · Appl. Phys. A · 2005 · 82 · 22310.1007/s00339-005-3426-7 ↗
24. Qu · J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed. · 2021 · 32 · 163510.1080/09205063.2021.1932070 ↗
25. Niu · RSC Adv. · 2019 · 9 · 4107410.1039/C9RA09344C ↗
26. Monti · J. Raman Spectrosc. · 1998 · 29 · 29710.1002/(SICI)1097-4555(199804)29:4<297::AID-JRS240>3.0.CO;2-G ↗
27. Jin · Biomacromolecules · 2002 · 3 · 123310.1021/bm025581u ↗
28. Jin · Biomaterials · 2004 · 25 · 103910.1016/S0142-9612(03)00609-4 ↗
29. Wray · J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part B · 2011 · 99 · 8910.1002/jbm.b.31875 ↗
30. Cao · Mater. Sci. Eng., C · 2009 · 29 · 227010.1016/j.msec.2009.05.012 ↗
31. Rodriguez · Biomaterials · 2020 · 230 · 11956710.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119567 ↗
32. Brown · Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 565110.1002/adma.201103482 ↗
33. Castilho · Biomacromolecules · 2021 · 22 · 85510.1021/acs.biomac.0c01577 ↗
34. Rizzo · ACS Omega · 2023 · 8 · 2416510.1021/acsomega.2c07149 ↗
35. Tokareva · Acta Biomater. · 2014 · 10 · 161210.1016/j.actbio.2013.08.020 ↗
36. Rammensee · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2008 · 105 · 659010.1073/pnas.0709246105 ↗
37. Stark · Biomacromolecules · 2007 · 8 · 169510.1021/bm070049y ↗
38. Wu · Adv. Sci. · 2022 · 9 · 210398110.1002/advs.202103981 ↗
39. Mu · Macromol. Biosci. · 2020 · 20 · 190019110.1002/mabi.201900191 ↗
40. Castilho · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2018 · 28 · 180315110.1002/adfm.201803151 ↗
41. Shojaee · Adv. Healthcare Mater. · 2017 · 6 · 170000110.1002/adhm.201700001 ↗
42. Wu · Front. Mater. · 2020 · 710.3389/fmats.2020.00220 ↗
43. Genderen · Adv. Healthcare Mater. · 2018 · 7 · 180052910.1002/adhm.201800529 ↗
44. Karsdal · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2017 · 121 · 4310.1016/j.addr.2017.07.014 ↗
45. Raghavan · Am. J. Physiol.: Renal Physiol. · 2016 · 310 · F110.1152/ajpcell.00229.2015 ↗
46. Lertkiatmongkol · Curr. Opin. Hematol. · 2016 · 23 · 25310.1097/MOH.0000000000000239 ↗
47. Hulshof · J. Tissue Eng. Regener. Med. · 2018 · 12 · e81710.1002/term.2387 ↗
48. van Genderen · Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. · 2021 · 8 · 61736410.3389/fbioe.2020.617364 ↗
49. Rockwood · Nat. Protoc. · 2011 · 6 · 161210.1038/nprot.2011.379 ↗
50. Castilho · Adv. Healthcare Mater. · 2017 · 170031110.1002/adhm.201700311 ↗
51. Hildebrand · J. Bone Miner. Res. · 1999 · 14 · 116710.1359/jbmr.1999.14.7.1167 ↗
52. Conrad · J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. · 2020 · 106 · 10373010.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103730 ↗
53. Jansen · Exp. Cell Res. · 2014 · 323 · 8710.1016/j.yexcr.2014.02.011 ↗
54. Satchell · Kidney Int. · 2006 · 69 · 163310.1038/sj.ki.5000277 ↗