Confined Ionic Liquid-Built Gas Transfer Pathways for Efficient Propylene/Propane Separation
Source abstract
Abstract
The separation of light olefins from paraffins using membrane technology is highly desired; however, synthetic polymer membranes generally suffer a pernicious trade-off between permeability and selectivity. Herein, we show that this limitation can be overcome by constructing selective gas transfer pathways in a polymer matrix, as demonstrated by incorporating composites of ionic liquids and zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs) to form mixed-matrix membranes. Using propylene/propane separation as a model system, dramatic improvements in the propylene permeability of 218.4 Barrer and propylene/propane separation factor of 45.7 were achieved compared to the values obtained using individual components as a filler. The synergy between the high solubility of the gas molecules in ionic liquids and the size screening ability of ZIF exacerbates the difference in the transmission of propylene and propane, thus leading to superior separation performance. This work presents a promising strategy for the design of membranes for efficient gas separation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies · Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Separation Membranes and Membrane Processes, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300387, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Science and Technology Plans of Tianjin
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/532435a10.1038/532435a ↗
2. 10.1002/anie.20180765210.1002/anie.201807652 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b0526010.1021/acs.iecr.7b05260 ↗
4. 10.1021/jacs.1c0210810.1021/jacs.1c02108 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.11928410.1016/j.seppur.2021.119284 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20180644510.1002/adma.201806445 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.120377110.1126/science.1203771 ↗
8. 10.1021/jacs.0c0748110.1021/jacs.0c07481 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.03010.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.030 ↗
10. 10.1021/ma981454810.1021/ma9814548 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0011910.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00119 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41563-017-0013-110.1038/s41563-017-0013-1 ↗
13. 10.1002/anie.20210084110.1002/anie.202100841 ↗
14. 10.1002/adfm.20210557710.1002/adfm.202105577 ↗
15. 10.1039/C7CS00153C10.1039/C7CS00153C ↗
16. 10.1021/cr200190s10.1021/cr200190s ↗
17. 10.1038/nmat462110.1038/nmat4621 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.trechm.2019.02.01210.1016/j.trechm.2019.02.012 ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20150550810.1002/anie.201505508 ↗
20. 10.1021/jacs.1c0078310.1021/jacs.1c00783 ↗
21. 10.1038/nmat497410.1038/nmat4974 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsapm.8b0008910.1021/acsapm.8b00089 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0030510.1021/acs.jpcc.6b00305 ↗
24. 10.1039/C7CP08456K10.1039/C7CP08456K ↗
25. 10.1021/je050357o10.1021/je050357o ↗
26. 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.09.08610.1016/j.memsci.2017.09.086 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.6b1107410.1021/acsami.6b11074 ↗
28. 10.1021/la802045j10.1021/la802045j ↗
29. 10.1039/C5CP00116A10.1039/C5CP00116A ↗
30. 10.1002/cphc.20170084310.1002/cphc.201700843 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00430-110.1016/S0376-7388(02)00430-1 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.10.00310.1016/j.memsci.2011.10.003 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.05310.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.053 ↗
34. 10.1002/adma.20180751310.1002/adma.201807513 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ces.2017.12.05110.1016/j.ces.2017.12.051 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41563-020-0764-y10.1038/s41563-020-0764-y ↗
37. 10.1021/acsanm.8b0068210.1021/acsanm.8b00682 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.11.06910.1016/j.memsci.2017.11.069 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0107310.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01073 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ces.2019.04.03210.1016/j.ces.2019.04.032 ↗
41. 10.1002/anie.20180899110.1002/anie.201808991 ↗
42. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0485810.1021/acssuschemeng.8b04858 ↗