journal article·2021-11-17Open access

Machine Learning Enabled Models to Predict Sulfur Solubility in Nuclear Waste Glasses

Xinyi Xu, Taihao Han, Jie Huang, Albert A. Kruger, Aditya Kumar, Ashutosh Goel

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 13· Issue 45

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Energy is considering implementing the direct feed approach for the vitrification of low-activity waste (LAW) and high-level waste (HLW) at the Hanford site in Washington state. If implemented, the nuclear waste with a higher concentration of alkali/alkaline-earth sulfates (than expected under the previously proposed vitrification scheme) will be sent to the vitrification facility. It will be difficult for the existing empirical models to predict sulfate solubility in these glasses or design glass formulations with enhanced sulfate loadings in such a scenario. Further, the existing models are unable to produce reliable predictions when applied to HLW glasses whose composition falls outside of the range encompassed by the database used to develop/calibrate the models. Accordingly, this study harnesses the power of artificial intelligence (machine learning, ML) with a goal to address the limitations of the existing models. Toward this, three ML models have been trained using a large database; comprising >1000 LAW and HLW glasses and encompassing a wide range of glass compositions and processing variables. Next, the ML model with the best prediction performance has been used to quantitatively assess and rank the influence (i.e., importance) of glasses’ compositional/processing variables on the SO3 solubility in the glasses. Finally, on the premise of such understanding of influential and inconsequential variables, two closed-form analytical models─with disparate degrees of complexity (one highly parametrized and one with fewer input variables)─have been developed. Results show that both analytical models produce predictions of SO3 solubility in LAW and HLW glasses with an accuracy analogous to ML models and substantially higher than the analytical models that represent the current state-of-the-art. Overall, this study’s outcomes present a roadmap─informed by data and channeled by artificial intelligence─that can be leveraged in the future to design nuclear waste glasses with unprecedented sulfur loadings.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Glass properties and applications · Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, United States

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, Missouri 65409, United States

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, Missouri 65409, United States

Office of River Protection, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland, Washington 99354, United States

Funding

Missouri University of Science and Technology · U.S. Department of Energy · Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation · Leonard Wood Institute · National Science Foundation

References (71)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/jace.1312510.1111/jace.13125 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.11010.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.110 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.09.04110.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.09.041 ↗
4. 10.1007/BF0112109110.1007/BF01121091 ↗
5. 10.1007/BF0240820010.1007/BF02408200 ↗
6. 10.1111/ijag.1327210.1111/ijag.13272 ↗
7. Vienna, J.; Piepel, G.; Kim, D.S.; Crum, J.; Lonergan, C.; Stanfill, B.; Riley, B.; Cooley, S.; Jin, T. 2016 Update of Hanford Glass Property Models and Constraints for Use in Estimating the Glass Mass to Be Produced at Hanford by Implementing Current Enhanced Glass Formulation Efforts, PNNL-25835; Pacific Northwest National Laboratory: Richland, WA, USA, 2016.10.2172/1772236 ↗
8. Sobolev I. A. · Glass Technol. · 2005 · 46 · 28
9. 10.2172/151383310.2172/1513833 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0022-3093(02)01604-610.1016/S0022-3093(02)01604-6 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2003.09.03510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2003.09.035 ↗
12. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02773.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02773.x ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b1092410.1021/acs.jpcc.9b10924 ↗
14. 10.2172/20836610.2172/208366 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.nocx.2019.10003310.1016/j.nocx.2019.100033 ↗
16. Muller I. S. · 2015
17. 10.1111/ijag.1236610.1111/ijag.12366 ↗
18. 10.1111/ijag.1588110.1111/ijag.15881 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.11964310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.119643 ↗
20. 10.1007/978-3-319-44680-6_10010.1007/978-3-319-44680-6_100 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0105410.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01054 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.12.00510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.12.005 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.02.02310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.02.023 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.02.03710.1016/j.actbio.2020.02.037 ↗
25. Aloy, A.; Soshnikov, R.; Trofimenko, A. V.; Vienna, J. D.; Elliott, M. L.; Holtzscheiter, E. W. Improved Loading of Sulfate─Limited Waste in Glass. Waste Management 2006 Symposium, INIS-US-09-WM-06331, Tucson, AZ, USA, Feb. 26–Mar. 2, 2006; WM Symposia: Tucson, AZ, USA, 2006.
26. 10.2172/89325710.2172/893257 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.05.01510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.05.015 ↗
28. 10.2172/82404010.2172/824040 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2007.07.02410.1016/j.materresbull.2007.07.024 ↗
30. 10.2172/118601210.2172/1186012 ↗
31. 10.1002/9781118408438.ch1310.1002/9781118408438.ch13 ↗
32. 10.2172/110949610.2172/1109496 ↗
33. 10.2172/103519310.2172/1035193 ↗
34. 10.2172/151583710.2172/1515837 ↗
35. 10.2172/110596310.2172/1105963 ↗
36. 10.2172/152877510.2172/1528775 ↗
37. 10.2172/110597410.2172/1105974 ↗
38. 10.2172/110949110.2172/1109491 ↗
39. 10.2172/105947910.2172/1059479 ↗
40. 10.1111/j.2041-1294.2010.00035.x10.1111/j.2041-1294.2010.00035.x ↗
41. 10.1088/1742-6596/190/1/01218610.1088/1742-6596/190/1/012186 ↗
42. 10.2172/151279810.2172/1512798 ↗
43. 10.1111/jace.1777810.1111/jace.17778 ↗
44. 10.2172/98157110.2172/981571 ↗
45. 10.1021/es302734y10.1021/es302734y ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b0915810.1021/acs.jpcb.7b09158 ↗
47. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000290210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002902 ↗
48. 10.1038/s41598-021-83582-610.1038/s41598-021-83582-6 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.10386310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103863 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10992010.1016/j.matdes.2021.109920 ↗
51. 10.1007/BF0099310610.1007/BF00993106 ↗
52. 10.1002/eng2.1216710.1002/eng2.12167 ↗
53. 10.1023/A:101093340432410.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2012.04.00310.1016/j.ygeno.2012.04.003 ↗
55. 10.1021/ci034160g10.1021/ci034160g ↗
56. 10.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.8810.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88 ↗
57. 10.1155/2016/764846710.1155/2016/7648467 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.05410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.054 ↗
59. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-21310.1186/1471-2105-10-213 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.patcog.2019.10707810.1016/j.patcog.2019.107078 ↗
61. Lenoir, M.; Grandjean, A.; Neuville, D. R. A Kinetic Approach of Sulphur Behaviour in Borosilicate Glasses and Melts: Implications for Sulphate Incorporation in Nuclear Waste Glasses. Atalante: Scientific Report 2008. Nuclear Fuel Cycle for a Sustainable Future, Technical Report CEA-R-6181; CEA Marcoule: Montpellier, France, 2008.
62. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.09.07710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.09.077 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.07.00410.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.07.004 ↗
64. Schreiber H. D. · Glastech. Ber. · 1987 · 60 · 389
65. 10.2172/112326110.2172/1123261 ↗
66. 10.1016/S0022-3093(02)00945-610.1016/S0022-3093(02)00945-6 ↗
67. Stefanovskij S. V. · Radiokhimiya · 1989 · 31 · 129
68. 10.1557/PROC-412-14110.1557/PROC-412-141 ↗
69. 10.2172/619042210.2172/6190422 ↗
70. Jin, T.; Riversa, E. L.; Kim, D. S.; Droubaya, T. C.; Jahrman, E. P.; Mara, D.; Weese, B. L.; Seidler, G. T.; Kruger, A. A. Effect of Chlorine and Chromium on Sulfur Solubility in Low Activity Waste Glasses. 2021, submitted for publication.10.1111/ijag.16540 ↗
71. 10.1093/comjnl/7.4.30810.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 ↗