journal article·2020-12-16Open access

Direct Measure of Electrode Spatial Heterogeneity: Influence of Processing Conditions on Anode Architecture and Performance

Mary K. Burdette-Trofimov, Beth L. Armstrong, Johanna Nelson Weker, Alexander M. Rogers, Guang Yang, Ethan C. Self, Ryan R. Armstrong, Jagjit Nanda, Gabriel M. Veith

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 12· Issue 50

Abstract

In this work, the spatial (in)homogeneity of aqueous processed silicon electrodes using standard poly(acrylic acid)-based binders and slurry preparation conditions is demonstrated. X-ray nanotomography shows segregation of materials into submicron-thick layers depending on the mixing method and starting binder molecular weights. Using a dispersant, or in situ production of dispersant from the cleavage of the binder into smaller molecular weight species, increases the resulting lateral homogeneity while drastically decreasing the vertical homogeneity as a result of sedimentation and separation due to gravitational forces. This data explains some of the variability in the literature with respect to silicon electrode performance and demonstrates two potential ways to improve slurry-based electrode fabrications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Semiconductor materials and devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Chemical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, United States

Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, United States

Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California 94025, United States

Funding

Vehicle Technologies Program

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/anie.20120156810.1002/anie.201201568 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.elecom.2007.10.00110.1016/j.elecom.2007.10.001 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.06.05910.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.06.059 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsami.7b1464510.1021/acsami.7b14645 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.120915010.1126/science.1209150 ↗
6. 10.1039/C4TA04320K10.1039/C4TA04320K ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0502010.1021/acs.chemmater.8b05020 ↗
8. 10.1021/jp201691g10.1021/jp201691g ↗
9. 10.1021/nl404237j10.1021/nl404237j ↗
10. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.08210.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.082 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.5b1061610.1021/acsami.5b10616 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.06.15210.1016/j.electacta.2016.06.152 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.03.07310.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.03.073 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0081510.1021/acsenergylett.9b00815 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.5b1067310.1021/acsami.5b10673 ↗
16. 10.1021/am401642c10.1021/am401642c ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.05.28610.1016/j.jallcom.2018.05.286 ↗
18. 10.1039/C5EE00239G10.1039/C5EE00239G ↗
19. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.12.01110.1016/j.nanoen.2014.12.011 ↗
20. 10.1021/am100871y10.1021/am100871y ↗
21. 10.1002/cssc.20120065010.1002/cssc.201200650 ↗
22. 10.1002/adfm.20140126910.1002/adfm.201401269 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.05.09410.1016/j.electacta.2017.05.094 ↗
24. 10.1038/nchem.180210.1038/nchem.1802 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.5b1136310.1021/acsami.5b11363 ↗
26. 10.1149/2.0991810jes10.1149/2.0991810jes ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.05.01910.1016/j.jelechem.2019.05.019 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.03.01710.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.03.017 ↗
29. 10.1002/aenm.20170004510.1002/aenm.201700045 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.03.04210.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.03.042 ↗
31. 10.1039/C8QM00660A10.1039/C8QM00660A ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.22693810.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.226938 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.10.04110.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.10.041 ↗
34. Flores-Zamora M. I. · Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci · 2008 · 18 · 301
35. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.11.12610.1016/j.jallcom.2014.11.126 ↗
36. 10.1016/0032-5910(80)85015-710.1016/0032-5910(80)85015-7 ↗
37. 10.1007/s10751-005-9182-410.1007/s10751-005-9182-4 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.est.2018.06.00910.1016/j.est.2018.06.009 ↗
39. 10.1002/ente.20180030210.1002/ente.201800302 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.03.01210.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.03.012 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.04.01810.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.04.018 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0955-2219(96)00151-310.1016/S0955-2219(96)00151-3 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0334310.1021/acs.langmuir.7b03343 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01821-410.1016/S0921-5093(01)01821-4 ↗
45. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199810)10:15<1215::AID-ADMA1215>3.0.CO;2-010.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199810)10:15<1215::AID-ADMA1215>3.0.CO;2-0 ↗
46. 10.1007/BF0135221910.1007/BF01352219 ↗
47. 10.1007/BF0113205710.1007/BF01132057 ↗
48. Hays, K.; Ruther, R.; Armstrong, B.; Veith, G. Holistic View of the Interactions of Binders in Si-Based Composite Anodes: From Slurry Formulation to the Casted Electrode and its Impact on Electrochemical Performance. In Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society: 2018; 256.
49. Armstrong, B. Colloidal and Processing Science Characterization for Battery Systems. In 235th ECS Meeting; Dallas, TX, 2019.
50. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0431010.1021/acs.langmuir.6b04310 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.11910.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.119 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.05.03010.1016/j.jcis.2013.05.030 ↗
53. 10.1021/la205157d10.1021/la205157d ↗
54. 10.1149/2.037302jes10.1149/2.037302jes ↗
55. 10.1149/1.217707110.1149/1.2177071 ↗
56. 10.1063/1.86814710.1063/1.868147 ↗
57. 10.1017/S143192761000023110.1017/S1431927610000231 ↗
58. 10.1107/S090904951101936410.1107/S0909049511019364 ↗
59. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0544210.1021/acs.chemmater.6b05442 ↗
60. 10.1107/S090904951104914410.1107/S0909049511049144 ↗
61. 10.1007/s11548-010-0499-310.1007/s11548-010-0499-3 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.ces.2004.04.04210.1016/j.ces.2004.04.042 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.06.21310.1016/j.ceramint.2019.06.213 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.powtec.2005.05.03110.1016/j.powtec.2005.05.031 ↗
65. 10.1007/s10853-011-6072-910.1007/s10853-011-6072-9 ↗
66. 10.1016/S0955-2219(03)00340-610.1016/S0955-2219(03)00340-6 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.15210.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.152 ↗
68. Bard A. J. · 1985
69. Milazzo G. · 197810.1149/1.2131790 ↗
70. Swift E. H. · 1972
71. 10.1021/la104906r10.1021/la104906r ↗
72. 10.1007/s00397-019-01130-610.1007/s00397-019-01130-6 ↗
73. 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b0239610.1021/acs.macromol.5b02396 ↗
74. Kim H. J. · J. Clean Energy Technol. · 2013 · 1 · 4510.7763/JOCET.2013.V1.11 ↗
75. 10.1016/S0927-7757(03)00325-X10.1016/S0927-7757(03)00325-X ↗
76. 10.1021/ma991372z10.1021/ma991372z ↗
77. 10.1103/PhysRev.155.71210.1103/PhysRev.155.712 ↗
78. 10.1103/PhysRevB.11.227110.1103/PhysRevB.11.2271 ↗
79. 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.07330410.1103/PhysRevB.64.073304 ↗
80. 10.1021/acsami.8b0219710.1021/acsami.8b02197 ↗
81. MacQueen, J. Some Methods for Classification and Analysis of Multivariate Observations. In Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability; Lecam, L., Neyman, J., Eds. University of California Press: Berkeley and Los Angeles, California, 1967; Vol. 1.
82. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb01043.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb01043.x ↗
83. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08888.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08888.x ↗
84. 10.1016/0921-5093(95)09785-610.1016/0921-5093(95)09785-6 ↗
85. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00648.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00648.x ↗
86. 10.2298/PAC1204215J10.2298/PAC1204215J ↗
87. 10.1016/S0955-2219(98)00165-410.1016/S0955-2219(98)00165-4 ↗
88. Maranville C. W. · 199610.31274/rtd-180814-6233 ↗
89. Mistler R. E. · 2000
90. 10.1016/S0272-8842(03)00126-310.1016/S0272-8842(03)00126-3 ↗
91. 10.1016/B978-0-08-034720-2.50129-510.1016/B978-0-08-034720-2.50129-5 ↗
92. 10.1016/S0167-577X(02)01238-710.1016/S0167-577X(02)01238-7 ↗
93. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08141.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08141.x ↗
94. 10.1149/1.173921710.1149/1.1739217 ↗
95. 10.1149/1.165242110.1149/1.1652421 ↗
96. 10.1149/1.240211210.1149/1.2402112 ↗
97. 10.1122/1.55074210.1122/1.550742 ↗
98. 10.1016/0144-8617(81)90011-410.1016/0144-8617(81)90011-4 ↗
99. 10.1122/1.54998710.1122/1.549987 ↗
100. 10.1122/1.54999110.1122/1.549991 ↗