journal article·2020-09-23Open access

Graphite Intercalation Compounds Derived by Green Chemistry as Oxygen Reduction Reaction Catalysts

Jianchao Zhao, Joseph H. Dumont, Ulises Martinez, Javier Macossay, Kateryna Artyushkova, Plamen Atanassov, Gautam Gupta

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 12· Issue 38

Abstract

Precious group metal (PGM) catalysts such as Pt supported on carbon supports are expensive catalysts utilized for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) due to their unmatched catalytic activity and durability. As an alternative, PGM-free ORR electrocatalysts that offer respectable catalytic activity are being pursued. Most of the notable PGM-free catalysts are obtained either from a bottom-up approach synthesis utilizing nitrogen-rich polymers as building blocks, or from a top down approach, where nitrogen and metal moieties are incorporated to carbonaceous matrixes. The systematic understanding of the origin of catalytic activity for either case is speculative and currently employed synthesis techniques typically generate large amounts of hazardous waste such as acids, oxidizing agents, and solvents. Herein, for the first time, we investigate the catalytic activity of graphite-based materials obtained via intercalation strategies that minimally perturb the graphitic backbone. Our outlined approaches demonstrate initial efforts to not only elucidate the role of each element but also significantly reduce the use of hazardous chemicals, which remains a pressing challenge. Graphite intercalation compounds (GIC) were obtained using fewer steps and solvent-free processes. X-ray diffraction and Raman results confirm the successful intercalation of FeCl3 between graphite layers. Electrochemical data shows that the ORR performance of FeCl3-intercalated GIC displays slight improvement where the onset potential reaches 0.77 V vs RHE in alkaline environments. However, expansion of the graphite and solvent-free incorporation of iron and nitrogen moieties resulted in a significant increase in ORR activity with onset potential to 0.89 V vs RHE, a maximum half-wave of 0.72 V vs RHE, and a limiting current of about 2.5 mA cm–2. We anticipate that the use of near solvent-free processes that result in a high yield of catalysts along with the fundamental insight into the origin of electrochemical activity will tremendously impact the methodologies for developing next-generation ORR catalysts.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, United States

Chemical Engineering Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky 40292, United States

Chemistry Department, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, Texas 78539, United States

Chemical Engineering Department, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, United States

Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering and National Fuel Cell Research Center, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, United States

Funding

Division of Chemistry · National Nuclear Security Administration

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10800-018-01280-010.1007/s10800-018-01280-0 ↗
2. 10.1039/c2ee22554a10.1039/c2ee22554a ↗
3. 10.1021/nn901850u10.1021/nn901850u ↗
4. 10.1039/c2cp41957b10.1039/c2cp41957b ↗
5. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.05.07510.1016/j.carbon.2019.05.075 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11581-018-2647-710.1007/s11581-018-2647-7 ↗
7. 10.1002/anie.20130731910.1002/anie.201307319 ↗
8. 10.1021/nn203393d10.1021/nn203393d ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.04710.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.047 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.02810.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.028 ↗
11. 10.1126/sciadv.140012910.1126/sciadv.1400129 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.08610.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.086 ↗
13. 10.1021/jp500781v10.1021/jp500781v ↗
14. 10.1002/celc.20180130210.1002/celc.201801302 ↗
15. Garsuch A. · 2010
16. 10.1002/ente.20170061510.1002/ente.201700615 ↗
17. 10.1021/jp055150g10.1021/jp055150g ↗
18. 10.1002/anie.20110017010.1002/anie.201100170 ↗
19. 10.1126/sciadv.150117810.1126/sciadv.1501178 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsanm.8b0223510.1021/acsanm.8b02235 ↗
21. 10.1038/nmat436710.1038/nmat4367 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.04.00210.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.04.002 ↗
23. 10.1038/ncomms142710.1038/ncomms1427 ↗
24. 10.1021/jp503266h10.1021/jp503266h ↗
25. Murray, J.; Ubbelohde, A. In Electronic Properties of Some Synthetic Metals Derived from Graphite, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, The Royal Society, 1969; pp 371–380.10.1098/rspa.1969.0164 ↗
26. 10.1016/0379-6779(82)90014-510.1016/0379-6779(82)90014-5 ↗
27. 10.1557/JMR.1989.156010.1557/JMR.1989.1560 ↗
28. 10.1039/C0EE00011F10.1039/C0EE00011F ↗
29. Pierson H. O. · 2012
30. 10.1039/c0jm03613g10.1039/c0jm03613g ↗
31. 10.1016/j.elecom.2010.10.02710.1016/j.elecom.2010.10.027 ↗
33. 10.1039/C8TA06670A10.1039/C8TA06670A ↗
34. 10.1351/pac19946609189310.1351/pac199466091893 ↗
35. 10.1039/B613962K10.1039/B613962K ↗
36. 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.11.01510.1016/j.carbon.2007.11.015 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ssc.2007.03.05210.1016/j.ssc.2007.03.052 ↗
38. 10.1038/nnano.2008.6710.1038/nnano.2008.67 ↗
39. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0346410.1021/acscatal.7b03464 ↗
40. 10.1039/C7TA01534H10.1039/C7TA01534H ↗
41. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.03.17010.1016/j.electacta.2018.03.170 ↗
42. 10.1002/adma.20160410310.1002/adma.201604103 ↗
43. 10.1023/A:101900702404110.1023/A:1019007024041 ↗