Durable, Stable, and Functional Nanopores Decorated by Self-Assembled Dipeptides
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanopores have become an important tool for the detection and analysis of molecules at the single-molecule level. Surface modification of solid-state nanopores can improve their durability and efficiency. Peptides are ideal for surface modifications as they allow tailoring of multiple properties by a rational design of their sequence. Here, silicon nitride nanopores were coated by a dipeptide layer where a l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) residue is the anchoring element and the other amino acid moiety is the functional element. DOPA binds tightly to many types of surfaces and allows a one-step functionalization of surfaces by simple immersion. As a result, the lifetime of coated nanopores increased from hours to months and the current-stability has significantly improved with respect to uncoated pores. This improvement is achieved by controlling the surface wettability and charge. Peptide-coated nanopores can be utilized as sensitive sensors that can be adjusted based on the choice of the functional moiety of the coated peptide. In addition, the coating slows down dsDNA translocation because of the DNA interaction with the pore coating.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Fuel Cells and Related Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Chemistry and The Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
Funding
Israel Science Foundation · Rosetrees Trust · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Minerva Centre for bio-hybrid complex systems
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat96510.1038/nmat965 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.298051810.1063/1.2980518 ↗
3. 10.1038/nnano.2011.12910.1038/nnano.2011.129 ↗
4. 10.1038/3508403710.1038/35084037 ↗
5. 10.1038/nbt.149510.1038/nbt.1495 ↗
6. 10.1529/biophysj.108.14047510.1529/biophysj.108.140475 ↗
7. 10.1021/nl070462b10.1021/nl070462b ↗
8. 10.1021/ac034602n10.1021/ac034602n ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20050199110.1002/adma.200501991 ↗
10. 10.1021/ja061357r10.1021/ja061357r ↗
11. 10.1038/nnano.2011.1210.1038/nnano.2011.12 ↗
12. 10.1038/nnano.2007.7810.1038/nnano.2007.78 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20090426810.1002/adma.200904268 ↗
14. Kang Q. · 2017 · 8510.1016/B978-0-323-40182-1.00004-X ↗
15. 10.1038/nmat96410.1038/nmat964 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.5b0369710.1021/acsami.5b03697 ↗
17. 10.1002/bip.2136810.1002/bip.21368 ↗
18. 10.1039/c4cc03578j10.1039/c4cc03578j ↗
19. 10.1038/nnano.2011.8810.1038/nnano.2011.88 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41467-017-02387-210.1038/s41467-017-02387-2 ↗
21. 10.1073/pnas.060555210310.1073/pnas.0605552103 ↗
22. 10.1126/science.212.4498.103810.1126/science.212.4498.1038 ↗
23. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-10042910.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-100429 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b0058710.1021/acs.biomac.8b00587 ↗
25. 10.1242/jeb.13405610.1242/jeb.134056 ↗
26. Langel U. · 2010
27. 10.1002/adma.20060119110.1002/adma.200601191 ↗
28. 10.1038/nmat94110.1038/nmat941 ↗
29. 10.1021/nn501331u10.1021/nn501331u ↗
30. 10.1021/nl803189k10.1021/nl803189k ↗
31. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/30/30550510.1088/0957-4484/18/30/305505 ↗
32. 10.1088/0957-4484/23/40/40530110.1088/0957-4484/23/40/405301 ↗
33. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/31/31510110.1088/0957-4484/22/31/315101 ↗
34. 10.1021/nn305167710.1021/nn3051677 ↗