journal article·2019-07-03Open access

Stiffness and Membrane Anchor Density Modulate DNA-Nanospring-Induced Vesicle Tubulation

Michael W Grome, Zhao Zhang, Chenxiang Lin

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 11· Issue 26

Abstract

DNA nanotechnology provides an avenue for the construction of rationally designed artificial assemblages with well-defined and tunable architectures. Shaped to mimic natural membrane-deforming proteins and equipped with membrane anchoring molecules, curved DNA nanostructures can reproduce subcellular membrane remodeling events such as vesicle tubulation in vitro. To systematically analyze how structural stiffness and membrane affinity of DNA nanostructures affect the membrane remodeling outcome, here we build DNA-origami curls with varying thickness and amphipathic peptide density, and have them polymerize into nanosprings on the surface of liposomes. We find that modestly reducing rigidity and maximizing the number of membrane anchors not only promote membrane binding and remodeling but also lead to the formation of lipid tubules with better defined diameters, highlighting the ability of programmable DNA-based constructs to controllably deform the membrane.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · RNA Interference and Gene Delivery · Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Cell Biology, Yale University School of Medicine, and Nanobiology Institute, Yale University, 850 West Campus Drive, West Haven, Connecticut 06516, United States

Funding

Yale University · National Institute of General Medical Sciences

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature0439610.1038/nature04396 ↗
2. 10.1242/jcs.11445410.1242/jcs.114454 ↗
3. 10.1088/1361-6463/aacb9810.1088/1361-6463/aacb98 ↗
4. 10.1083/jcb.20160400310.1083/jcb.201604003 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.01010.1016/j.cell.2009.04.010 ↗
6. 10.1038/nrm293710.1038/nrm2937 ↗
7. 10.1038/nature0102010.1038/nature01020 ↗
8. 10.1073/pnas.08210729910.1073/pnas.082107299 ↗
9. 10.1038/900410.1038/9004 ↗
10. 10.1016/0022-5193(82)90002-910.1016/0022-5193(82)90002-9 ↗
11. 10.1038/nature0458610.1038/nature04586 ↗
12. 10.1038/nature0801610.1038/nature08016 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.117425110.1126/science.1174251 ↗
14. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.6810.1038/natrevmats.2017.68 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0082510.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00825 ↗
16. 10.1038/nchem.280210.1038/nchem.2802 ↗
17. 10.1002/anie.20150117310.1002/anie.201501173 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0016110.1021/acsnano.5b00161 ↗
19. 10.1126/science.aaf515410.1126/science.aaf5154 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41467-018-02905-w10.1038/s41467-018-02905-w ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0018910.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00189 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41467-018-03198-910.1038/s41467-018-03198-9 ↗
23. 10.1002/anie.20180014110.1002/anie.201800141 ↗
24. 10.1021/ja207976q10.1021/ja207976q ↗
25. 10.1021/nn401362p10.1021/nn401362p ↗
26. 10.1021/nl203503s10.1021/nl203503s ↗
27. 10.1039/C4NR07153K10.1039/C4NR07153K ↗
28. 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.09.00910.1016/j.devcel.2013.09.009 ↗
29. 10.1093/nar/gkr117310.1093/nar/gkr1173 ↗
30. 10.1038/ncomms1469810.1038/ncomms14698 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0414810.1021/acsnano.8b04148 ↗
32. 10.1088/0022-3727/49/19/19400110.1088/0022-3727/49/19/194001 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0185010.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01850 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.01.00610.1016/j.jmb.2017.01.006 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.12.00410.1016/j.semcdb.2009.12.004 ↗
36. 10.1093/nar/gkp43610.1093/nar/gkp436 ↗
37. 10.1038/nprot.2013.03710.1038/nprot.2013.037 ↗
38. 10.1093/nar/gks107010.1093/nar/gks1070 ↗
39. 10.1002/anie.20140599110.1002/anie.201405991 ↗
40. 10.1186/1751-0473-9-1610.1186/1751-0473-9-16 ↗