journal article·2020-02-26

Contact-Triggered Lipofection from Multilayer Films Designed as Surfaces for in Situ Transfection Strategies in Tissue Engineering

Catharina Husteden, Falko Doberenz, Nathalie Goergen, Shashank Reddy Pinnapireddy, Christopher Janich, Andreas Langner, Frank Syrowatka, Alexandros Repanas, Frank Erdmann, Jarmila Jedelská, Udo Bakowsky, Thomas Groth, Christian Wölk

Publisher page

Abstract

Biomaterials, which release active compounds after implantation, are an essential tool for targeted regenerative medicine. In this study, thin multilayer films loaded with lipid/DNA complexes (lipoplexes) were designed as surface coatings for in situ transfection applicable in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. The film production and embedding of lipoplexes were based on the layer-by-layer (LbL) deposition technique. Hyaluronic acid (HA) and chitosan (CHI) were used as the polyelectrolyte components. The embedded plasmid DNA was complexed using a new designed cationic lipid formulation, namely, OH4/DOPE 1/1, the advantageous characteristics of which have been proven already. Three different methods were tested regarding its efficiency of lipid and DNA deposition. Therefore, several surface specific analytics were used to characterize the LbL formation, the lipid DNA embedding, and the surface characteristics of the multilayer films, such as fluorescence microscopy, surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy, ellipsometry, zeta potential measurements, atomic force microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. Interaction studies were conducted for optimized lipoplex-loaded polyelectrolyte multilayers (PEMs) that showed an efficient attachment of C2C12 cells on the surface. Furthermore, no acute toxic effects were found in cell culture studies, demonstrating biocompatibility. Cell culture experiments with C2C12 cells, a cell line which is hard to transfect, demonstrated efficient transfection of the reporter gene encoding for green fluorescent protein. In vivo experiments using the chicken embryo chorion allantois membrane animal replacement model showed efficient gene-transferring rates in living complex tissues, although the DNA-loaded films were stored over 6 days under wet and dried conditions. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that OH4/DOPE 1/1 lipoplex-loaded PEMs composed of HA and CHI can be an efficient tool for in situ transfection in regenerative medicine.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: RNA Interference and Gene Delivery · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Pharmacy, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Wolfgang-Langenbeck-Str. 4, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany

Institute of Pharmacy, Department Biomedical Materials, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Heinrich-Damerow-Str. 4, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany

Department of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, University of Marburg, Robert-Koch-Str. 4, 35037 Marburg, Germany

Interdisciplinary Center of Materials Science, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Heinrich-Damerow-Str. 4, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany

Institute of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Wolfgang-Langenbeck-Str. 4, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany

Laboratory of Biomedical Nanotechnologies, Institute of Bionic Technologies and Engineering, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State University, Trubetskaya Street 8, 119991 Moscow, Russian Federation

Institute of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig University, 04317 Leipzig, Germany

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · Freundeskreis f?r Pharmazie e.V

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nrg182910.1038/nrg1829 ↗
2. 10.1002/jgm.269810.1002/jgm.2698 ↗
3. 10.1038/mt.2016.1010.1038/mt.2016.10 ↗
4. 10.1038/nrg374210.1038/nrg3742 ↗
5. 10.1038/nrg296810.1038/nrg2968 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.04.00810.1016/j.jconrel.2012.04.008 ↗
7. 10.1038/gt.2009.14810.1038/gt.2009.148 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.298.5593.51010.1126/science.298.5593.510 ↗
9. 10.1038/nrg376310.1038/nrg3763 ↗
10. 10.1038/nrg157710.1038/nrg1577 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.addr.2010.03.00810.1016/j.addr.2010.03.008 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.09.01310.1016/j.jconrel.2007.09.013 ↗
13. 10.1002/jps.1028610.1002/jps.10286 ↗
14. 10.1021/cr800409e10.1021/cr800409e ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b0068810.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00688 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.11.01410.1016/j.jconrel.2011.11.014 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.07.01310.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.07.013 ↗
18. Kasputis T. · 2016 · 5 · 21910.1142/9789813202528_0006 ↗
19. 10.1038/sj.gt.330243910.1038/sj.gt.3302439 ↗
20. 10.1038/985310.1038/9853 ↗
21. 10.1557/mrs2005.19310.1557/mrs2005.193 ↗
22. 10.1021/bc015575f10.1021/bc015575f ↗
23. 10.1038/sj.gt.330145210.1038/sj.gt.3301452 ↗
24. 10.1039/b700410a10.1039/b700410a ↗
25. 10.1016/0040-6090(92)90417-a10.1016/0040-6090(92)90417-a ↗
26. 10.1126/science.277.5330.123210.1126/science.277.5330.1232 ↗
27. 10.1021/bm015529i10.1021/bm015529i ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20030463410.1002/adma.200304634 ↗
29. 10.1039/c5cs00781j10.1039/c5cs00781j ↗
30. 10.1021/la048888i10.1021/la048888i ↗
31. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.07.03610.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.07.036 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.03.02610.1016/j.jconrel.2013.03.026 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.00410.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.004 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2005.11.01510.1016/j.bbamem.2005.11.015 ↗
35. 10.1002/adfm.20060015510.1002/adfm.200600155 ↗
36. 10.1021/am303029k10.1021/am303029k ↗
37. 10.1002/adhm.20160031610.1002/adhm.201600316 ↗
38. 10.1111/j.1524-475x.2012.00777.x10.1111/j.1524-475x.2012.00777.x ↗
39. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.02810.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.028 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2012.04.00710.1016/j.ejpb.2012.04.007 ↗
41. 10.1021/bm034130m10.1021/bm034130m ↗
42. 10.1002/ejlt.20130040510.1002/ejlt.201300405 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.10.04510.1016/j.jconrel.2015.10.045 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.12.00710.1016/j.ejpb.2016.12.007 ↗
45. 10.1039/c6sm00807k10.1039/c6sm00807k ↗
46. Saffari M. · Iran. J. Pharm. Res. · 2016 · 15 · 3
47. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.12.00610.1016/j.ymthe.2004.12.006 ↗
48. 10.1146/annurev.bb.09.060180.00234310.1146/annurev.bb.09.060180.002343 ↗
49. Gale G. W. · 2008 · 20110.1016/B978-081551554-8.50007-0 ↗
50. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b0006010.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00060 ↗
51. 10.1021/bm501286f10.1021/bm501286f ↗
52. 10.1038/nmeth.201910.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
53. 10.3390/ma903015010.3390/ma9030150 ↗
54. 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199603)30:3<385::aid-jbm13>3.0.co;2-j10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199603)30:3<385::aid-jbm13>3.0.co;2-j ↗
55. 10.1002/mabi.20100008610.1002/mabi.201000086 ↗
56. 10.1039/b902027f10.1039/b902027f ↗
57. 10.3934/biophy.2015.2.16310.3934/biophy.2015.2.163 ↗
58. 10.1080/1071754059095255510.1080/10717540590952555 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.cocis.2016.05.00210.1016/j.cocis.2016.05.002 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.06.06310.1016/j.jcis.2011.06.063 ↗
61. 10.1002/mabi.20170007810.1002/mabi.201700078 ↗
62. 10.1021/ma980674i10.1021/ma980674i ↗
63. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.08.01210.1016/j.actbio.2011.08.012 ↗
64. 10.1016/s1534-5807(04)00075-910.1016/s1534-5807(04)00075-9 ↗
65. 10.1002/mawe.20030069910.1002/mawe.200300699 ↗
66. 10.1038/mtna.2016.810.1038/mtna.2016.8 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.01.02810.1016/j.jconrel.2011.01.028 ↗
68. 10.1039/c6nr00649c10.1039/c6nr00649c ↗
69. 10.1089/ten.tec.2017.018610.1089/ten.tec.2017.0186 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.05.02310.1016/j.actbio.2016.05.023 ↗