journal article·2019-01-09

Engineering Graphene Oxide Laminate Membranes for Enhanced Flux and Boron Treatment with Polyethylenimine (PEI) Polymers

Changwoo Kim, Siyuan An, Junseok Lee, Qingqing Zeng, John D. Fortner

Publisher page

Abstract

In this work, we have developed and characterized flux-enhanced graphene oxide laminate (GOL) membranes by increasing interlayer (layer-to-layer) spacing using multibranched polyethylenimine (PEI) polymers with varied molecular weights and by controlling the graphene oxide (GO) oxidation extent. For these assemblies, water flux was demonstrated to increase by as much as ca. 30-fold compared to GO only laminate controls. PEI-embedded GOL membranes also had better methyl orange (MO) rejection performance than GO laminate controls due to the dilution effects (i.e., water is transported through the assembly much faster than MO). Further, boron removal is demonstrated via functionalized PEI with d-glucono-1,5-lactone, containing a high density of boron chelating groups, which can also be recycled/recovered with high efficiency.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Graphene research and applications · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Energy, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, United States

Funding

Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems · U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.121169410.1126/science.1211694 ↗
2. 10.1039/B917103G10.1039/B917103G ↗
3. 10.1038/nchem.90710.1038/nchem.907 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.est.6b0571110.1021/acs.est.6b05711 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.desal.2014.12.04610.1016/j.desal.2014.12.046 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.117124510.1126/science.1171245 ↗
7. 10.1038/nnano.2010.13210.1038/nnano.2010.132 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0014810.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00148 ↗
9. 10.1038/nature2404410.1038/nature24044 ↗
10. 10.1038/nnano.2017.2110.1038/nnano.2017.21 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.est.5b0090410.1021/acs.est.5b00904 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.desal.2015.12.02610.1016/j.desal.2015.12.026 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.06.04210.1016/j.memsci.2012.06.042 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.desal.2007.06.02910.1016/j.desal.2007.06.029 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0370010.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03700 ↗
16. 10.1021/es301518x10.1021/es301518x ↗
17. 10.1002/smll.20100152210.1002/smll.201001522 ↗
18. 10.1021/ma051079110.1021/ma0510791 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0011-9164(04)90013-610.1016/S0011-9164(04)90013-6 ↗
20. 10.1021/es103991u10.1021/es103991u ↗
21. 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00663-310.1016/S0376-7388(00)00663-3 ↗
22. 10.1126/science.125024710.1126/science.1250247 ↗
23. Shahriary L. · Int. J. Renewable Energy Environ. Eng. · 2014 · 2 · 58
24. 10.1021/ja01539a01710.1021/ja01539a017 ↗