journal article·2022-12-28

Colorimetry Combined with Inner Filter Effect-Based Fluorometry: A Versatile and Robust Strategy for Multimode Visualization of Food Dyes

Shuangshou Wang, Haili Wang, Zhihong Yuan, Mengyao Li, Hongrui Gao, Liangjingjing Shan, Aowei Li, Yuwen Ding, Jing Gu, Lei Zhu, Tingxuan Yan, Mingfu Ye, Jin Ye

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 14· Issue 51
Publisher page

Abstract

Herein, a strategy combining colorimetry and inner filter effect (IFE)-based fluorometry was developed for multimode visualization of food dyes (FDs) using CdTe quantum-dots-doped fluorescent indicator papers as a sample-to-answer device. Colorimetry was straightforwardly achieved by FDs extraction through electrostatic interaction and hydrophobic effect while fluorometry was implemented by IFE-induced fluorescence quenching. RGB/gray-scale values of colorimetry and fluorometry were furtherly picked by a smartphone application and applied to reconstruct color information-based digital image analysis for both direct alignments and linear regression analysis. The apparent color and fluorescence of FDs-bound indicator papers, together with their digitized color information, showed a good mapping to FDs concentrations in the range of 0-0.5 mg/mL for Sunset Yellow, 0-0.2 mg/mL for Allura Red, and 0-0.08 mg/mL for Brilliant Blue. As a proof of concept, the dosages of these FDs in real beverages and simulated dye effluents were deduced and cross-validated by different visualization modes, and finally double-checked by instrumental techniques such as spectrometric methods, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and mass spectroscopy (MS). The above findings concluded that (i) IFE mechanism is generally applicable to build fluorometric systems and (ii) cross validation of different visualization modes can markedly improve detection accuracy, which may provide references for design and fabrication of novel "lab-on-paper" devices for visualization applications with high reliability.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dye analysis and toxicity · Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques · Mercury impact and mitigation studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Anhui University of Technology, Maanshan 243032, China

Anhui Engineering Technology Research Center of Biochemical Pharmaceutical, Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu 233030, China

Institute of Grain and Oil Quality and Safety, Academy of National Food and Strategic Reserves Administration, Beijing 100037, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province · Student Research Training Program of Anhui University of Technology · Open Project of Anhui Engineering Technology Research Cen-ter of Biochemical Pharmaceutical (Bengbu Medical College)

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/10408398.2014.88965210.1080/10408398.2014.889652 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.03.04310.1016/j.foodchem.2017.03.043 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.fct.2021.11252410.1016/j.fct.2021.112524 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.10412310.1016/j.bioorg.2020.104123 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.09.02610.1016/j.yrtph.2015.09.026 ↗
6. 10.1177/109158181989839610.1177/1091581819898396 ↗
7. 10.1002/jat.374710.1002/jat.3747 ↗
8. 10.1080/19440049.2020.174684010.1080/19440049.2020.1746840 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.07.08510.1016/j.foodchem.2015.07.085 ↗
10. 10.1007/s12161-020-01894-110.1007/s12161-020-01894-1 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.10.11210.1016/j.snb.2017.10.112 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.11.07710.1016/j.foodchem.2018.11.077 ↗
13. 10.47836/ifrj.28.1.1210.47836/ifrj.28.1.12 ↗
14. 10.1021/jf400602a10.1021/jf400602a ↗
15. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.02.13610.1016/j.foodchem.2019.02.136 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ccr.2022.21444210.1016/j.ccr.2022.214442 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.13247810.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132478 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41596-021-00546-w10.1038/s41596-021-00546-w ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.12918210.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129182 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.12270610.1016/j.talanta.2021.122706 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.12673410.1016/j.snb.2019.126734 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.13308710.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133087 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.microc.2022.10808810.1016/j.microc.2022.108088 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.microc.2022.10751310.1016/j.microc.2022.107513 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.aca.2022.33990110.1016/j.aca.2022.339901 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.12916010.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129160 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.04.05510.1016/j.talanta.2019.04.055 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.5b1023010.1021/acsami.5b10230 ↗
29. 10.1002/bio.346710.1002/bio.3467 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.02.05010.1016/j.snb.2018.02.050 ↗
31. 10.1039/C8AN01552J10.1039/C8AN01552J ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b0096510.1021/acs.analchem.7b00965 ↗
33. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab35a010.1088/2053-1591/ab35a0 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2015.12.05210.1016/j.jlumin.2015.12.052 ↗
35. 10.1002/rcm.622710.1002/rcm.6227 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.12964310.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129643 ↗
37. 10.1002/chem.20220026310.1002/chem.202200263 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsami.9b2316710.1021/acsami.9b23167 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.13087110.1016/j.snb.2021.130871 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.11549410.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115494 ↗
41. 10.1039/C5AY01105A10.1039/C5AY01105A ↗
42. 10.1016/j.saa.2020.11922210.1016/j.saa.2020.119222 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.09.01910.1016/j.foodchem.2017.09.019 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.04.05510.1016/j.talanta.2019.04.055 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.12916010.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129160 ↗
46. 10.1007/s12161-021-02059-410.1007/s12161-021-02059-4 ↗