Understanding the Effect of Cathode Composition on the Interface and Crosstalk in NMC/Si Full Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Crosstalk between the cathode and the anode in lithium-ion batteries has a great impact on performance, safety, and cycle lifetime. However, no report exists for a systematic investigation on crosstalk behavior in silicon (Si)-based cells as a function of transition metal composition in cathodes. We studied the effect of crosstalk on degradation of Si-rich anodes in full cells with different cathodes having the same crystal structure but different transition metal compositions, such as LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2 (NM111), LiNi0.5Mn0.3Co0.2O2 (NMC532), and LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2 (NMC811). We found that the transition metal composition in cathodes, especially Mn ion concentration, significantly affects electrolyte decomposition reactions, even from very early cycles. This change causes differences in the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) chemistry of each aged Si sample. As a result, each of the aged Si samples has a different electrochemistry, in terms of initial Coulombic efficiency and the mechanism of capacity fade.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chemical Science and Engineering Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States
Department of Chemistry, Inha University, 100 Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea
Funding
Vehicle Technologies Program
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat136810.1038/nmat1368 ↗
2. 10.1038/3510464410.1038/35104644 ↗
3. 10.1149/1.240211210.1149/1.2402112 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.coelec.2018.02.00210.1016/j.coelec.2018.02.002 ↗
5. 10.1021/cr500207g10.1021/cr500207g ↗
6. 10.1073/pnas.120108810910.1073/pnas.1201088109 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsami.8b2222110.1021/acsami.8b22221 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.elecom.2011.10.02610.1016/j.elecom.2011.10.026 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.12.01310.1016/j.joule.2018.12.013 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0162710.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01627 ↗
11. 10.1149/1945-7111/abd56f10.1149/1945-7111/abd56f ↗
12. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.06.08610.1016/j.electacta.2018.06.086 ↗
13. 10.1149/1.298768010.1149/1.2987680 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.6b0206110.1021/acsami.6b02061 ↗
15. 10.1039/C7EE03122J10.1039/C7EE03122J ↗
16. 10.1021/jp507833u10.1021/jp507833u ↗
17. 10.1149/2.0101913jes10.1149/2.0101913jes ↗
18. 10.1038/s41560-019-0513-010.1038/s41560-019-0513-0 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.09.02010.1016/j.ensm.2020.09.020 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.04.06210.1016/j.nanoen.2018.04.062 ↗
21. 10.1002/aenm.20200202710.1002/aenm.202002027 ↗
22. 10.1039/C6TA07991A10.1039/C6TA07991A ↗
23. 10.1039/D1TA06304A10.1039/D1TA06304A ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0006310.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00063 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.7b1539510.1021/acsami.7b15395 ↗
26. 10.1149/1.221971010.1149/1.2219710 ↗
27. 10.1039/C6TA08865A10.1039/C6TA08865A ↗
28. 10.1149/2.1111702jes10.1149/2.1111702jes ↗
29. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.04.09110.1016/j.electacta.2014.04.091 ↗
30. 10.1149/2.0721514jes10.1149/2.0721514jes ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22932210.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229322 ↗
32. 10.1149/1.242749510.1149/1.2427495 ↗
33. 10.1073/pnas.191101711610.1073/pnas.1911017116 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jiec.2021.04.00210.1016/j.jiec.2021.04.002 ↗
35. 10.1039/D0CC01853H10.1039/D0CC01853H ↗
36. 10.1002/aenm.20210004610.1002/aenm.202100046 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsami.1c1572710.1021/acsami.1c15727 ↗