journal article·2018-10-17

Tuning Oxygen Vacancy Diffusion through Strain in SrTiO3 Thin Films

Lucia Iglesias, Andrés Gómez, Martí Gich, Francisco Rivadulla

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 10· Issue 41
Publisher page

Abstract

Understanding diffusion of oxygen vacancies in oxides under different external stimuli is crucial for the design of ion-based electronic devices, improvement of catalytic performance, and so forth. In this manuscript, using an external electric field produced by an atomic force microscopy tip, we obtain the room-temperature diffusion coefficient of oxygen-vacancies in thin films of SrTiO3 under compressive/tensile epitaxial strain. Tensile strain produces a substantial increase of the diffusion coefficient, facilitating the mobility of vacancies through the film. Additionally, the effect of tip bias, pulse time, and temperature on the local concentration of vacancies is investigated. These are important parameters of control in the production and stabilization of nonvolatile states in ion-based devices. Our findings show the key role played by strain for the control of oxygen vacancy migration in thin-film oxides.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centro Singular de Investigación en Química Biolóxica e Materiais Moleculares (CIQUS), Departamento de Química-Física, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain

Institut de Ciència de Materials de Barcelona (ICMAB-CSIC), Campus UAB, Bellaterra, Catalonia 08193, Spain

Funding

European Regional Development Fund · Ministerio de Econom?a y Competitividad · Conseller?a de Cultura, Educaci?n e Ordenaci?n Universitaria, Xunta de Galicia

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/cm402063u10.1021/cm402063u ↗
2. Khomskii D. I. · 201410.1017/CBO9781139096782 ↗
3. Goodenough J. B. · 1963
4. 10.1103/physrevlett.12.47410.1103/physrevlett.12.474 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.489615910.1063/1.4896159 ↗
6. 10.1038/srep2418810.1038/srep24188 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.124309810.1126/science.1243098 ↗
8. 10.1038/nphys292410.1038/nphys2924 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.36936310.1063/1.369363 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.203721110.1063/1.2037211 ↗
11. 10.1166/jnn.2010.280010.1166/jnn.2010.2800 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.495362410.1063/1.4953624 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.08.01310.1016/j.apsusc.2016.08.013 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20060291510.1002/adma.200602915 ↗
15. 10.1021/am501387w10.1021/am501387w ↗
16. 10.1063/1.496728010.1063/1.4967280 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.490105310.1063/1.4901053 ↗
18. 10.1038/nature0277310.1038/nature02773 ↗
19. 10.1103/physrevlett.104.19760110.1103/physrevlett.104.197601 ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20090037510.1002/adma.200900375 ↗
21. 10.1038/nmat202310.1038/nmat2023 ↗
22. 10.1016/s1369-7021(08)70119-610.1016/s1369-7021(08)70119-6 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41467-017-00710-510.1038/s41467-017-00710-5 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0102110.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01021 ↗
25. 10.1103/physrevlett.115.16680110.1103/physrevlett.115.166801 ↗
26. 10.1103/physrevb.95.16513810.1103/physrevb.95.165138 ↗
27. 10.1088/0957-4484/27/24/24570210.1088/0957-4484/27/24/245702 ↗
28. 10.2174/15734130878434086810.2174/157341308784340868 ↗
29. 10.1038/srep3055710.1038/srep30557 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.surfrep.2010.10.00110.1016/j.surfrep.2010.10.001 ↗
31. 10.1080/0141159900824181910.1080/01411599008241819 ↗
32. 10.1088/0957-4484/12/4/32110.1088/0957-4484/12/4/321 ↗
33. 10.1021/nn305987x10.1021/nn305987x ↗
34. Crank J. · 1975
35. 10.1002/anie.20070098710.1002/anie.200700987 ↗
36. 10.1103/physrevb.85.17410910.1103/physrevb.85.174109 ↗
37. 10.1039/c5nr03643g10.1039/c5nr03643g ↗
38. 10.1063/1.480965610.1063/1.4809656 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.477539710.1063/1.4775397 ↗
40. 10.1038/nmat161410.1038/nmat1614 ↗