journal article·2022-01-12Open access

Corrosion Resistance and Cytocompatibility of Magnesium–Calcium Alloys Modified with Zinc- or Gallium-Doped Calcium Phosphate Coatings

Dilara Goksu Tamay, Seyda Gokyer, Jürgen Schmidt, Alina Vladescu, Pinar Yilgor Huri, Vasif Hasirci, Nesrin Hasirci

Abstract

In orthopedic surgery, metals are preferred to support or treat damaged bones due to their high mechanical strength. However, the necessity for a second surgery for implant removal after healing creates problems. Therefore, biodegradable metals, especially magnesium (Mg), gained importance, although their extreme susceptibility to galvanic corrosion limits their applications. The focus of this study was to control the corrosion of Mg and enhance its biocompatibility. For this purpose, surfaces of magnesium–calcium (MgCa1) alloys were modified with calcium phosphate (CaP) or CaP doped with zinc (Zn) or gallium (Ga) via microarc oxidation. The effects of surface modifications on physical, chemical, and mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of the alloys were studied using surface profilometry, goniometry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), nanoindentation, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The coating thickness was about 5–8 μm, with grain sizes of 43.1 nm for CaP coating and 28.2 and 58.1 nm for Zn- and Ga-doped coatings, respectively. According to EIS measurements, the capacitive response (Yc) decreased from 11.29 to 8.72 and 0.15 Ω–1 cm–2 sn upon doping with Zn and Ga, respectively. The Ecorr value, which was −1933 mV for CaP-coated samples, was found significantly electropositive at −275 mV for Ga-doped ones. All samples were cytocompatible according to indirect tests. In vitro culture with Saos-2 cells led to changes in the surface compositions of the alloys. The numbers of cells attached to the Zn-doped (2.6 × 104 cells/cm2) and Ga-doped (6.3 × 104 cells/cm2) coatings were higher than that on the surface of the undoped coating (1.0 × 103 cells/cm2). Decreased corrosivity and enhanced cell affinity of the modified MgCa alloys (CaP coated and Zn and Ga doped, with Ga-doped ones having the greatest positive effect) make them novel and promising candidates as biodegradable metallic implant materials for the treatment of bone damages and other orthopedic applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

BIOMATEN, Center of Excellence in Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara 06800, Turkey

Department of Biotechnology, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara 06800, Turkey

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ankara University, Ankara 06830, Turkey

Team Leader Electrochemistry, INNOVENT e.V. Technology Development, Prüssingstraße 27b, Jena 07745, Germany

National Institute of Research and Development for Optoelectronics - INOE 2000, 409 Atomistilor St., Magurele 077125, Romania

Physical Materials Science and Composite Materials Centre, Research School of Chemistry and Applied Biomedical Sciences, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Lenin Avenue 43, Tomsk 634050, Russia

Department of Medical Engineering, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul 34684, Turkey

Biomaterials Center, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul 34684, Turkey

Department of Chemistry, Middle East Technical University, Ankara 06800, Turkey

Tissue Engineering and Biomaterial Research Center, Near East University, 99138 Nicosia, TRNC, Mersin 10, Turkey

Funding

Bundesministerium f??r Bildung und Forschung · Tomsk Polytechnic University · T??rkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Ara??tirma Kurumu · Autoritatea Na??ional?? pentru Cercetare ??tiin??ific?? ??i Inovare

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Hasirci V. · 2018 · 110.1007/978-1-4939-8856-3 ↗
2. 10.1007/s40898-016-0001-210.1007/s40898-016-0001-2 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.engreg.2020.05.00310.1016/j.engreg.2020.05.003 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jmst.2019.07.02410.1016/j.jmst.2019.07.024 ↗
5. Poologasundarampillai G. · 2017 · 4310.1016/B978-0-08-100717-4.00002-8 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jma.2021.03.02710.1016/j.jma.2021.03.027 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jma.2018.02.00310.1016/j.jma.2018.02.003 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jma.2020.09.01110.1016/j.jma.2020.09.011 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.00310.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.003 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jma.2021.03.01610.1016/j.jma.2021.03.016 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0098-2997(02)00089-410.1016/S0098-2997(02)00089-4 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.corsci.2007.01.00110.1016/j.corsci.2007.01.001 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jma.2017.02.00410.1016/j.jma.2017.02.004 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.corsci.2012.04.03010.1016/j.corsci.2012.04.030 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.02810.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.028 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.mser.2014.01.00110.1016/j.mser.2014.01.001 ↗
17. Westengen H. · 2006 · 145
18. 10.14741/ijcet/spl.2.2014.10210.14741/ijcet/spl.2.2014.102 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.05.01410.1016/j.actbio.2008.05.014 ↗
20. 10.5772/2392910.5772/23929 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.07.02210.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.07.022 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.00410.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.004 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.00210.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.002 ↗
24. 10.1073/pnas.151823811310.1073/pnas.1518238113 ↗
25. 10.1556/1646.9.2017.1.0410.1556/1646.9.2017.1.04 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10825910.1016/j.matdes.2019.108259 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.corsci.2018.11.01110.1016/j.corsci.2018.11.011 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.11.05010.1016/j.actbio.2020.11.050 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jma.2020.06.02110.1016/j.jma.2020.06.021 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.02110.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.021 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jma.2019.09.00810.1016/j.jma.2019.09.008 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.matlet.2008.06.02810.1016/j.matlet.2008.06.028 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jma.2019.11.00310.1016/j.jma.2019.11.003 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jma.2020.05.00510.1016/j.jma.2020.05.005 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.10.02010.1016/j.actbio.2009.10.020 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.mseb.2011.03.00210.1016/j.mseb.2011.03.002 ↗
37. 10.1038/nm157710.1038/nm1577 ↗
38. 10.1155/2012/35315210.1155/2012/353152 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.12.00910.1016/j.jcms.2015.12.009 ↗
40. 10.1080/14686996.2018.145171710.1080/14686996.2018.1451717 ↗
41. 10.1680/si.13.0003510.1680/si.13.00035 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.12.02110.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.12.021 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.02.11710.1016/j.apsusc.2008.02.117 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.10.01510.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.10.015 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jma.2019.09.01210.1016/j.jma.2019.09.012 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jma.2020.02.00910.1016/j.jma.2020.02.009 ↗
47. 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(200005)50:23.0.co;2-310.1002/(sici)1097-4636(200005)50:23.0.co;2-3 ↗
48. 10.1039/C4RA12118J10.1039/C4RA12118J ↗
49. 10.1016/J.SDENTJ.2018.06.00310.1016/J.SDENTJ.2018.06.003 ↗
50. 10.3390/NANO904051510.3390/NANO9040515 ↗
51. 10.1016/J.APSUSC.2010.03.12410.1016/J.APSUSC.2010.03.124 ↗
52. 10.1007/S10856-012-4817-X10.1007/S10856-012-4817-X ↗
53. 10.1680/SI.13.0003510.1680/SI.13.00035 ↗
54. 10.1007/S10856-016-5777-310.1007/S10856-016-5777-3 ↗
55. 10.1163/15685620778103412410.1163/156856207781034124 ↗
56. 10.1002/app.2768710.1002/app.27687 ↗
57. 10.1016/0166-6622(83)80014-610.1016/0166-6622(83)80014-6 ↗
58. 10.1080/0031910980803060310.1080/00319109808030603 ↗
59. ISO 14577-1: Metallic Materials ─ Instrumented Indentation Test for Hardness and Materials Parameters ─ Part 1: Test Method, 2015.
60. ISO 14577-1 Metallic Materials ─ Instrumented Indentation Test for Hardness and Materials Parameters ─ Part 1: Test Method, 2002.
61. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00395-110.1016/S0142-9612(00)00395-1 ↗
62. 10.1016/J.COLSURFB.2020.11090110.1016/J.COLSURFB.2020.110901 ↗
63. 10.1016/J.SURFCOAT.2014.04.04810.1016/J.SURFCOAT.2014.04.048 ↗
64. 10.1177/088532820605051810.1177/0885328206050518 ↗
65. 10.1016/J.SURFCOAT.2006.12.01010.1016/J.SURFCOAT.2006.12.010 ↗
66. 10.17586/2220-8054-2018-9-3-364-36910.17586/2220-8054-2018-9-3-364-369 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.jds.2012.09.00110.1016/j.jds.2012.09.001 ↗
68. 10.3390/COATINGS1008072710.3390/COATINGS10080727 ↗
69. 10.1038/s41598-017-16985-z10.1038/s41598-017-16985-z ↗
70. 10.1016/J.SSI.2009.04.00210.1016/J.SSI.2009.04.002 ↗
71. Akmene R. J. · Phys. Chem. Mech. Surf. · 1993 · 8 · 125
72. 10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2011.11.01410.1016/J.ACTBIO.2011.11.014 ↗
73. 10.1002/JBM.A.1048210.1002/JBM.A.10482 ↗
74. 10.1002/MACO.20181076210.1002/MACO.201810762 ↗
75. 10.2147/IJN.S12323610.2147/IJN.S123236 ↗
76. 10.1016/J.BIOACTMAT.2018.01.00310.1016/J.BIOACTMAT.2018.01.003 ↗
77. 10.1002/jbm.b.3268010.1002/jbm.b.32680 ↗
78. 10.1016/J.MSEC.2019.10992610.1016/J.MSEC.2019.109926 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.01110.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.011 ↗
80. 10.3390/coatings1007066410.3390/coatings10070664 ↗
81. 10.3390/ma1211187710.3390/ma12111877 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.actbio.2006.12.00310.1016/j.actbio.2006.12.003 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.06.01610.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.06.016 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.12.02110.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.12.021 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.11.02110.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.11.021 ↗
86. 10.1038/s41467-019-14153-710.1038/s41467-019-14153-7 ↗
87. Gupta M. · 2015
88. 10.1039/C3TB21746A10.1039/C3TB21746A ↗
89. 10.1016/j.jma.2020.09.01310.1016/j.jma.2020.09.013 ↗
90. 10.1007/s12011-009-8445-310.1007/s12011-009-8445-3 ↗
91. 10.1016/j.msec.2008.12.01510.1016/j.msec.2008.12.015 ↗
92. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.01.05010.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.01.050 ↗
93. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.05.01310.1016/j.actbio.2013.05.013 ↗
94. 10.1016/j.msec.2013.06.00410.1016/j.msec.2013.06.004 ↗
95. 10.3390/ma501013510.3390/ma5010135 ↗
96. 10.3390/ma1318411610.3390/ma13184116 ↗
97. 10.1134/S207020511703002910.1134/S2070205117030029 ↗
98. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.03710.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.037 ↗
99. 10.1002/jbm.b.3272610.1002/jbm.b.32726 ↗
100. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.09.05010.1016/j.apsusc.2010.09.050 ↗