Low-Cost Copper Nanostructures Impart High Efficiencies to Quantum Dot Solar Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Quantum dot solar cells (QDSCs) were fabricated using low-cost Cu nanostructures and a carbon fabric as a counter electrode for the first time. Cu nanoparticles (NPs) and nanoneedles (NNs) with a face-centered cubic structure were synthesized by a hydrothermal method and electrophoretically deposited over a CdS QD sensitized titania (TiO2) electrode. Compared to Cu NPs, which increase the light absorption of a TiO2/CdS photoanode via scattering effects only in the visible region, Cu NNs are more effective for efficient far-field light scattering; they enhance the light absorption of the TiO2/CdS assembly beyond the visible to near-infrared (NIR) regions as well. The highest fluorescence quenching, lowest excited electron lifetime, and a large surface potential (deduced from Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM)) observed for the TiO2/CdS/Cu NN electrode compared to TiO2/CdS and TiO2/CdS/Cu NP electrodes confirm that Cu NNs also facilitate charge transport. KPFM studies also revealed a larger shift of the apparent Fermi level to more negative potentials in the TiO2/CdS/Cu NN electrode, compared to the other two electrodes (versus NHE), which results in a higher open-circuit voltage for the Cu NN based electrode. The best performing QDSC based on the TiO2/CdS/Cu NN electrode delivers a stellar power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 4.36%, greater by 56.8% and 32.1% than the PCEs produced by the cells based on TiO2/CdS and TiO2/CdS/Cu NPs, respectively. A maximum external quantum efficiency (EQE) of 58% obtained for the cell with the TiO2/CdS/Cu NN electrode and a finite EQE in the NIR region which the other two cells do not deliver are clear indicators of the enormous promise this cheap, earth-abundant Cu nanostructure holds for amplifying the solar cell response in both the visible and near-infrared regions through scattering enhancements.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Perovskite Materials and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Ordnance Factory Estate, Yeddumailaram-502205, Telangana, India
Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory, Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO), Hyderabad-500058, Telangana, India
Funding
Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology · University Grants Commission
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Hyunbong C. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 441810.1021/nn301137r ↗
2. Long R. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2014 · 136 · 434310.1021/ja5001592 ↗
3. Qi J. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 710810.1021/nn201808g ↗
4. Sheehan W. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2013 · 117 · 92710.1021/jp311881k ↗
5. Zhang W. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 450510.1021/nl4024287 ↗
6. Zarick H. F. · ACS Photonics · 2014 · 1 · 80610.1021/ph500281v ↗
7. Gangishetty M. K. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2013 · 5 · 1104410.1021/am403280r ↗
8. Li H. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2013 · 5 · 560110.1021/am400914g ↗
9. Kumar P. N. · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2014 · 2 · 977110.1039/c4ta01140f ↗
10. Kumar P. N. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2014 · 118 · 1892410.1021/jp5052408 ↗
11. Parsi Benehkohal N. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2012 · 116 · 1639110.1021/jp3056009 ↗
12. Choi H. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2014 · 118 · 20610.1021/jp410235s ↗
13. Zhang H. · Chem. Commun. · 2012 · 48 · 1123510.1039/c2cc36526j ↗
14. Hossain M. A. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2012 · 22 · 1623510.1039/c2jm33211f ↗
15. Pan Z. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 398210.1021/nn300278z ↗
16. Yan K. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2013 · 135 · 953110.1021/ja403756s ↗
17. Chang Y. · Langmuir · 2005 · 21 · 374610.1021/la050220w ↗
18. Warren S. C. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2012 · 5 · 513310.1039/C1EE02875H ↗
19. Warren S. C. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2012 · 5 · 513310.1039/C1EE02875H ↗
20. Kamat P. V. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2013
21. Jakob M. · Nano Lett. · 2003 · 3 · 35310.1021/nl0340071 ↗
22. Subramanian V. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2004 · 126 · 494310.1021/ja0315199 ↗
23. Kamat P. V. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 1873710.1021/jp806791s ↗
24. Santra P. K. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2013 · 135 · 87710.1021/ja310737m ↗
25. Yin Z. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2014 · 4 · 110.1142/9789814513289_0001 ↗
26. Murakami T. N. · Inorg. Chim. Acta · 2008 · 361 · 57210.1016/j.ica.2007.09.025 ↗
27. Chen X. · Chem. Rev. · 2010 · 110 · 650310.1021/cr1001645 ↗
28. Li L. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 845810.1021/ja201841p ↗
29. Wang Y. · J. Nanomater. · 2012 · 1
30. Sun W. T. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2008 · 130 · 112410.1021/ja0777741 ↗
31. Shen Q. · Sol. Cells—New Aspects Solutions · 2011 · 287
32. Shalom M. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2010 · 1 · 113410.1021/jz1002555 ↗
33. Ehrler B. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 421010.1021/nn400656n ↗
34. Shalom M. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2011 · 2 · 199810.1021/jz200863j ↗