Carbon Nanofibers Functionalized with Active Screen Plasma-Deposited Metal Nanoparticles for Electrical Energy Storage Devices
Source abstract
Abstract
Supercapacitors are energy storage devices with higher energy densities than conventional capacitors but lower than batteries or fuel cells. There is a strong interest in increasing the volumetric and gravimetric capacitance of these devices to meet the growing demands of the electrical and electronic sectors. The capacitance depends largely on the electrode material, and carbon nanofibers (CNFs) have attracted much attention because of their relatively low cost, large surface area, and good electrical conductivity as well as chemical and thermal stability. The deposition of metal nanoparticles on CNFs is a promising way to increase their surface properties and, ultimately, the capacitance of the devices. In this study, nickel and silver nanoparticles were deposited on CNFs using the active screen plasma technology. The CNFs were characterized, and their electrochemical performance was assessed in a three-electrode cell. The results show significant improvements over the untreated CNFs, particularly after functionalization with silver nanoparticles.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advancements in Battery Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Metallurgy and Materials, University of Birmingham Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom
School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom
School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens Iroon Polytechneiou 9, Zografou 157 80, Greece
Funding
Seventh Framework Programme
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat136810.1038/nmat1368 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.06510.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.065 ↗
3. 10.1038/nmat229710.1038/nmat2297 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.24910.1016/j.rser.2015.12.249 ↗
5. 10.1021/cm101591p10.1021/cm101591p ↗
6. 10.1098/rsta.2010.010910.1098/rsta.2010.0109 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.120077010.1126/science.1200770 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.02.07110.1016/j.cplett.2004.02.071 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mattod.2015.01.00210.1016/j.mattod.2015.01.002 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.nantod.2014.06.01110.1016/j.nantod.2014.06.011 ↗
11. 10.1149/2.112311jes10.1149/2.112311jes ↗
12. 10.1039/c3cp53504e10.1039/c3cp53504e ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.11.02410.1016/j.jallcom.2008.11.024 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.03.03210.1016/j.carbon.2004.03.032 ↗
15. 10.5012/bkcs.2008.29.4.77710.5012/bkcs.2008.29.4.777 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10853-017-0861-810.1007/s10853-017-0861-8 ↗
17. 10.1038/srep4242510.1038/srep42425 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.04.00710.1016/j.nanoen.2017.04.007 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.6b1305010.1021/acsami.6b13050 ↗
20. 10.1179/02670840122500525010.1179/026708401225005250 ↗
21. Standard Reference Test Method for Making Potentiodynamic Anodic Polarization Measurements, ASTM G5;ASTM International, 2014; pp1–9.
22. 10.1149/2.017310jss10.1149/2.017310jss ↗
23. 10.1063/1.173601210.1063/1.1736012 ↗
24. 10.1116/1.497491310.1116/1.4974913 ↗
25. 10.1007/s40820-016-0105-510.1007/s40820-016-0105-5 ↗
26. 10.1039/C4TA05565A10.1039/C4TA05565A ↗
27. 10.1016/j.diamond.2003.10.06110.1016/j.diamond.2003.10.061 ↗
28. General Safe Practices for Working with Engineered Nanomaterials in Research Laboratories, DHHS No 2012-147;NIOSH, 2012; pp1–60.