journal article·2021-12-08Open access

Pulmonary Delivery of Reactive Oxygen Species/Glutathione-Responsive Paclitaxel Dimeric Nanoparticles Improved Therapeutic Indices against Metastatic Lung Cancer

Xidong Tian, Hriday Bera, Xiong Guo, Ruizhao Xu, Jin Sun, Zhonggui He, Dongmei Cun, Mingshi Yang

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 13· Issue 48

Abstract

Chemotherapeutics often failed to elicit optimal antitumor responses against lung cancer due to their limited exposure and accumulation in tumors. To achieve an effective therapeutic outcome of paclitaxel (PTX) against metastatic lung cancer with attenuated systemic and local toxicities, pulmonary delivery of redox-responsive PTX dimeric nanoparticles (NPs) was introduced. PTX dimers conjugated through variable lengths of diacid linkers containing disulfide bonds (−SS−) (i.e., α–PTX–SS–PTX, β–PTX–SS–PTX, and γ–PTX–SS–PTX) were initially synthesized and were subsequently self-assembled into uniform nanosized particles in the presence of vitamin E TPGS with high drug loading capacity (DE > 97%). Among various redox-sensitive scaffolds, β–PTX–SS–PTX NPs exhibited an optimal reactive oxygen species/glutathione-responsive drug release behavior, causing a lower local toxicity profile of PTX in the lungs. The scaffolds also demonstrated excellent colloidal stability, cellular uptake efficiency, and discriminating cytotoxicity between cancer and healthy cells. Further, they depicted an improved lung retention as compared to the control nanovesicles (β–PTX–CC–PTX) devoid of the redox-sensitive disulfide motif. In the B16F10 melanoma metastatic lung cancer mouse model, intratracheally delivered β–PTX–SS–PTX NPs exhibited a stronger anticancer potential with reduced systemic toxicity as compared to Taxol intravenous injection containing an equivalent PTX dose. The PTX dimeric NPs could also dramatically reduce the local toxicity relative to Taxol following their pulmonary delivery. Thus, this study presents redox-responsive PTX dimeric NPs as a promising nanomedicine for improved therapeutic efficacy against metastatic lung cancer.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery · Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics · Sulfur Compounds in Biology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Wuya College of Innovation, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Wenhua Road No. 103, 10016 Shenyang, China

Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 2, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

Funding

State Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs · Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Liaoning Pan Deng Xue Zhe Scholar · Minister of Education Chunhui Program · Guiding Project for Science and Technology of Liaoning Province

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3322/caac.2166010.3322/caac.21660 ↗
2. 10.1007/s12094-020-02295-w10.1007/s12094-020-02295-w ↗
3. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30958-810.1016/S0140-6736(16)30958-8 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.05.01610.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.05.016 ↗
5. 10.3390/ijms1808173310.3390/ijms18081733 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0073710.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00737 ↗
7. 10.1002/anie.20150432910.1002/anie.201504329 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.12.01310.1016/j.jconrel.2018.12.013 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.envres.2018.11.01410.1016/j.envres.2018.11.014 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.05.01510.1016/j.apsb.2021.05.015 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.07.01810.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.07.018 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.04610.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.046 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ejps.2013.02.00610.1016/j.ejps.2013.02.006 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.03.01710.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.03.017 ↗
15. 10.1007/s10853-020-05361-410.1007/s10853-020-05361-4 ↗
16. 10.1038/aps.2017.3410.1038/aps.2017.34 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.07.03610.1016/j.jconrel.2020.07.036 ↗
18. 10.1002/smll.20200503910.1002/smll.202005039 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.03.39110.1016/j.jconrel.2017.03.391 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.tips.2014.09.00810.1016/j.tips.2014.09.008 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0163210.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01632 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b0084610.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00846 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41467-019-11193-x10.1038/s41467-019-11193-x ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.6b1305710.1021/acsami.6b13057 ↗
25. 10.1002/smll.20160159710.1002/smll.201601597 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.04.00110.1016/j.jconrel.2019.04.001 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.01810.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.018 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.0c0035510.1021/acsami.0c00355 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.08.00810.1016/j.jconrel.2016.08.008 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.10.02910.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.10.029 ↗
31. 10.1038/srep3661410.1038/srep36614 ↗
32. 10.1021/mp400091n10.1021/mp400091n ↗
33. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.10410.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.104 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsami.7b0811010.1021/acsami.7b08110 ↗
35. 10.1021/nl502044x10.1021/nl502044x ↗
36. 10.2147/IJN.S15538310.2147/IJN.S155383 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.11.02110.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.11.021 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.01.17110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.01.171 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ejps.2008.05.00510.1016/j.ejps.2008.05.005 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.apsb.2018.05.00410.1016/j.apsb.2018.05.004 ↗
41. 10.1002/adma.20150202210.1002/adma.201502022 ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.biomac.0c0096910.1021/acs.biomac.0c00969 ↗
43. 10.1134/s0030400x1302020310.1134/s0030400x13020203 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.07.02510.1016/j.jconrel.2019.07.025 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.taap.2006.01.01610.1016/j.taap.2006.01.016 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsami.0c2125910.1021/acsami.0c21259 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.03.02210.1016/j.jconrel.2014.03.022 ↗