journal article·2019-06-19

Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Glioblastoma Using a Functionalized Gadofullerene Nanoparticle

Daiqin Chen, Yue Zhou, Dongzhi Yang, Mirong Guan, Mingming Zhen, Weifei Lu, Marcian E. Van Dort, Brian D. Ross, Chunru Wang, Chunying Shu, Hao Hong

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 11· Issue 24
Publisher page

Abstract

Water-soluble gadofullerene nanomaterials have been extensively investigated as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents, radical scavengers, sensitizers for photodynamic therapy, and inherent antineoplastic agents. Most recently, an alanine-modified gadofullerene nanoparticle (Gd@C82-Ala) with excellent anticancer activity has been reported; however, the absolute tumor uptake of Gd@C82-Ala is still far from being satisfactory, and its dynamic pharmacokinetics and long-term metabolic behaviors remain to be elucidated. Herein, Gd@C82-Ala was chemically modified with eight-arm polyethylene glycol amine to improve its biocompatibility and provide the active sites for the attachment of a tumor-homing ligand (cRGD) and positron emission tomography (PET) isotopes (i.e., 64Cu or 89Zr). The physical and chemical properties (e.g., size, surface functionalization condition, radiochemical stability, etc.) of functionalized Gd@C82-Ala were properly characterized. Also, its glioblastoma cell targeting capacity was evaluated in vitro by flow cytometry, confocal fluorescence microscopy, and dynamic cellular interaction assays. Because of the presence of gadolinium ions, the gadofullerene conjugates can act simultaneously as T1* MRI contrast agents and PET probes. Thus, the pharmacokinetic behavior of functionalized Gd@C82-Ala was investigated by PET/MRI, which combines the merits of high resolution and excellent sensitivity. The functionalized Gd@C82-Ala-PEG-cRGD-NOTA-64Cu (NOTA stands for 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-triacetic acid) demonstrated much higher accumulation in U87-MG tumor than its counterpart without cRGD attachment from in vivo PET observation, consistent with observation at the cellular level. In addition, Gd@C82-Ala-PEG-Df-89Zr (Df stands for desferrioxamine) was employed to investigate the metabolic behavior of gadofullerene conjugates in vivo for up to 30 days. It was estimated that nearly 70% of Gd@C82-Ala-PEG-Df-89Zr was excreted from the test subjects primarily through renal pathways within 24 h. With proper surface engineering, functionalized Gd@C82-Ala nanoparticles can show an improved accumulation in glioblastoma. Pharmacokinetic studies also confirmed the safety of this nanoplatform, which can be used as an image-guidable therapeutic agent for glioblastoma.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fullerene Chemistry and Applications · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Graphene research and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Radiology, Center for Molecular Imaging, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2200, United States

Key Laboratory of Molecular Nanostructure and Nanotechnology, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Jiangsu Key Laboratory of New Drug Research and Clinical Pharmacy, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221004, China

College of Animal Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450002, China

University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0944, United States

Funding

National Cancer Institute · Government of Jiangsu Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Department of Radiology, University of Michigan

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/nl051624b10.1021/nl051624b ↗
2. 10.1073/pnas.120460010910.1073/pnas.1204600109 ↗
3. 10.1007/s40843-015-0089-310.1007/s40843-015-0089-3 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsami.6b0865910.1021/acsami.6b08659 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.06110.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.061 ↗
6. 10.1002/adhm.20160040210.1002/adhm.201600402 ↗
7. 10.1021/cm702398210.1021/cm7023982 ↗
8. 10.1002/cmmi.14010.1002/cmmi.140 ↗
9. 10.2217/nnm.13.16010.2217/nnm.13.160 ↗
10. 10.1016/S1872-2040(11)60581-110.1016/S1872-2040(11)60581-1 ↗
11. 10.1093/toxsci/kfp26510.1093/toxsci/kfp265 ↗
12. 10.1093/toxsci/kfl16510.1093/toxsci/kfl165 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.nano.2011.08.01910.1016/j.nano.2011.08.019 ↗
14. 10.1021/bc700274210.1021/bc7002742 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.04.02110.1016/j.jconrel.2015.04.021 ↗
16. 10.1126/science.110427410.1126/science.1104274 ↗
17. 10.1007/s00216-014-8422-310.1007/s00216-014-8422-3 ↗
18. 10.2217/nnm.10.13410.2217/nnm.10.134 ↗
19. 10.1021/bc000136m10.1021/bc000136m ↗
20. 10.1021/ja034098410.1021/ja0340984 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41467-017-00741-y10.1038/s41467-017-00741-y ↗
22. 10.1007/s00723-014-0519-510.1007/s00723-014-0519-5 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0730-725X(03)00081-X10.1016/S0730-725X(03)00081-X ↗
24. 10.1038/nbt134010.1038/nbt1340 ↗
25. 10.1038/nrc88210.1038/nrc882 ↗
26. 10.1021/ar500362y10.1021/ar500362y ↗
27. 10.1038/nm170010.1038/nm1700 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.05.02810.1016/j.ejrad.2013.05.028 ↗
29. 10.1038/ncomms409710.1038/ncomms4097 ↗
30. 10.1002/anie.20100789410.1002/anie.201007894 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsami.7b1006410.1021/acsami.7b10064 ↗
32. 10.1002/ange.20046080010.1002/ange.200460800 ↗
33. 10.2217/nnm.14.22410.2217/nnm.14.224 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.00610.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.006 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.01110.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.011 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0132010.1021/acsnano.5b01320 ↗
37. 10.2217/nnm.13.17710.2217/nnm.13.177 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0153010.1021/acsnano.7b01530 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.02910.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.029 ↗
40. Goel, S.; Chen, F.; Ehlerding, E. B.; Cai, W. Intrinsically Radiolabeled Nanoparticles: An Emerging Paradigm. Small; Weinheim an der Bergstrasse: Germany, 2014, 10, 3825–30.10.1002/smll.201401048 ↗