journal article·2018-12-26

Microporous and Flexible Framework Acoustic Metamaterials for Sound Attenuation and Contrast Agent Applications

Quin R. S. Miller, Satish K. Nune, H. Todd Schaef, Ki Won Jung, Kayte M. Denslow, Matthew S. Prowant, Paul F. Martin, B. Peter McGrail

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 10· Issue 51
Publisher page

Abstract

The low-frequency (100-1250 Hz) acoustic properties of metal-organic framework (MOF) materials were examined in impedance tube experiments. The anomalously high sound transmission loss of HKUST-1, FeBTC, and MIL-53(Al) quantitatively demonstrated that these prototypical MOFs are absorptive acoustic metamaterials. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of MOFs that have been demonstrated to be acoustic metamaterials. Low-frequency acoustic dampening by subwavelength MOF metamaterials is likely due to sound dissipation and absorption facilitated by multiple internal reflections within the microporous framework structure. Modification of MIL-53(Al) with flexible organic linkers clarified that acoustic signatures of the MOFs may be tailored to add or alter certain diagnostic acoustic signatures. These results may be applied to the rational design of lightweight sound-insulating construction materials and acoustic contrast agents for subsurface mapping and monitoring applications at low frequency (100-1250 Hz).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research · Cellular and Composite Structures · Noise Effects and Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.329900710.1063/1.3299007 ↗
2. Sharp B. H. · 1973
3. Bies D. A. · 2009
4. 10.1021/acsami.6b0959110.1021/acsami.6b09591 ↗
5. 10.2516/ogst:200504010.2516/ogst:2005040 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.estlett.6b0038710.1021/acs.estlett.6b00387 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.81910.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.819 ↗
8. 10.7494/drill.2013.30.1.19110.7494/drill.2013.30.1.191 ↗
9. 10.1111/1365-2478.1218110.1111/1365-2478.12181 ↗
10. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.110.1038/natrevmats.2016.1 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.20430110.1103/PhysRevLett.101.204301 ↗
12. 10.1126/science.289.5485.173410.1126/science.289.5485.1734 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.358365610.1063/1.3583656 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.8b0636110.1021/acsami.8b06361 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.petrol.2017.07.06210.1016/j.petrol.2017.07.062 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20100285410.1002/adma.201002854 ↗
17. 10.1021/jp507908610.1021/jp5079086 ↗
18. 10.1002/chem.20130380110.1002/chem.201303801 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ccr.2015.12.00410.1016/j.ccr.2015.12.004 ↗
20. 10.1039/C8CP00447A10.1039/C8CP00447A ↗
21. 10.1039/C4CC03853C10.1039/C4CC03853C ↗
22. 10.1021/jacs.6b1295610.1021/jacs.6b12956 ↗
23. 10.1038/nphys248010.1038/nphys2480 ↗
24. 10.1021/jp108710h10.1021/jp108710h ↗
25. 10.1039/c2dt31427d10.1039/c2dt31427d ↗
26. 10.1039/C5DT03510D10.1039/C5DT03510D ↗
27. 2009 · 2611
28. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.00910.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.009 ↗
29. Kinsler L. E. · 2000
30. 10.1121/1.496626810.1121/1.4966268 ↗