journal article·2018-09-26

Enhanced Metal Ion Rejection by a Low-Pressure Microfiltration System Using Cellulose Filter Papers Modified with Citric Acid

Yi-Lin Wu, Su Xu, TsingHai Wang, Chu-Fang Wang

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 10· Issue 38
Publisher page

Abstract

Energy consumption is always a major issue hindering the universal application of membrane-based filtration system. We herein demonstrated a low-energy-consumption microfiltration system that can be operated under ambient pressure while a great metal ion rejection rate (>95%) accompanied by a high permeate flux (100 L/m2h) was concurrently reached. This achievement was closely correlated to the enhanced metal ion adsorption by grafted carboxyl groups at the cellulose filter paper through esterification. Adsorbed metal ions consequently enhanced Donnan exclusion effect and therefore high rejection rate was achieved. Rejection rate of modified membrane was strongly correlated to the formation constant of associated carboxyl group to metal ions. Our results would be important for developing low-energy-consumption filtration systems for water and wastewater treatment application.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biomedical Engineering and Environment Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan

School of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, PR China

Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Yuan Ze University, Zhongli 32003, Taiwan

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0276810.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02768 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsami.7b1524210.1021/acsami.7b15242 ↗
3. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0235910.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02359 ↗
4. 10.1007/s10570-017-1563-810.1007/s10570-017-1563-8 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0056610.1021/acs.langmuir.7b00566 ↗
6. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0069810.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00698 ↗
7. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b0148910.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01489 ↗
8. 10.1016/S1093-0191(00)00002-210.1016/S1093-0191(00)00002-2 ↗
9. 10.1039/C6GC00687F10.1039/C6GC00687F ↗
10. Stumm W. · 1995
11. 10.1021/es100349k10.1021/es100349k ↗
12. 10.1021/am402024q10.1021/am402024q ↗
13. 10.1039/C7GC02489D10.1039/C7GC02489D ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.8b0064010.1021/acsami.8b00640 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.05010.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.050 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jtice.2018.01.05010.1016/j.jtice.2018.01.050 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.12.02810.1016/j.memsci.2013.12.028 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jcis.2015.12.01410.1016/j.jcis.2015.12.014 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00163-510.1016/S0376-7388(99)00163-5 ↗
20. 10.1016/0376-7388(94)85019-410.1016/0376-7388(94)85019-4 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.02.03010.1016/j.seppur.2017.02.030 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.10.03510.1016/j.memsci.2006.10.035 ↗
23. 10.1021/es026263610.1021/es0262636 ↗
24. 10.1006/jcis.1998.556310.1006/jcis.1998.5563 ↗
25. 10.1016/0021-9797(73)90387-110.1016/0021-9797(73)90387-1 ↗
26. 10.1039/B609547J10.1039/B609547J ↗
27. 10.1007/s00216-015-8858-010.1007/s00216-015-8858-0 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jtice.2017.02.00210.1016/j.jtice.2017.02.002 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jtice.2015.07.00210.1016/j.jtice.2015.07.002 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00007-410.1016/S0960-8524(01)00007-4 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsami.7b0460310.1021/acsami.7b04603 ↗
32. Martell A. E. · 199610.1007/978-1-4899-1486-6 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.desal.2008.04.00410.1016/j.desal.2008.04.004 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.08210.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.082 ↗
35. 10.1080/03067319.2016.125191310.1080/03067319.2016.1251913 ↗