Enhanced Metal Ion Rejection by a Low-Pressure Microfiltration System Using Cellulose Filter Papers Modified with Citric Acid
Source abstract
Abstract
Energy consumption is always a major issue hindering the universal application of membrane-based filtration system. We herein demonstrated a low-energy-consumption microfiltration system that can be operated under ambient pressure while a great metal ion rejection rate (>95%) accompanied by a high permeate flux (100 L/m2h) was concurrently reached. This achievement was closely correlated to the enhanced metal ion adsorption by grafted carboxyl groups at the cellulose filter paper through esterification. Adsorbed metal ions consequently enhanced Donnan exclusion effect and therefore high rejection rate was achieved. Rejection rate of modified membrane was strongly correlated to the formation constant of associated carboxyl group to metal ions. Our results would be important for developing low-energy-consumption filtration systems for water and wastewater treatment application.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedical Engineering and Environment Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan
School of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, PR China
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Yuan Ze University, Zhongli 32003, Taiwan
Funding
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0276810.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02768 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsami.7b1524210.1021/acsami.7b15242 ↗
3. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0235910.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02359 ↗
4. 10.1007/s10570-017-1563-810.1007/s10570-017-1563-8 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0056610.1021/acs.langmuir.7b00566 ↗
6. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0069810.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00698 ↗
7. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b0148910.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01489 ↗
8. 10.1016/S1093-0191(00)00002-210.1016/S1093-0191(00)00002-2 ↗
9. 10.1039/C6GC00687F10.1039/C6GC00687F ↗
10. Stumm W. · 1995
11. 10.1021/es100349k10.1021/es100349k ↗
12. 10.1021/am402024q10.1021/am402024q ↗
13. 10.1039/C7GC02489D10.1039/C7GC02489D ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.8b0064010.1021/acsami.8b00640 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.05010.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.050 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jtice.2018.01.05010.1016/j.jtice.2018.01.050 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.12.02810.1016/j.memsci.2013.12.028 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jcis.2015.12.01410.1016/j.jcis.2015.12.014 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00163-510.1016/S0376-7388(99)00163-5 ↗
20. 10.1016/0376-7388(94)85019-410.1016/0376-7388(94)85019-4 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.02.03010.1016/j.seppur.2017.02.030 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.10.03510.1016/j.memsci.2006.10.035 ↗
23. 10.1021/es026263610.1021/es0262636 ↗
24. 10.1006/jcis.1998.556310.1006/jcis.1998.5563 ↗
25. 10.1016/0021-9797(73)90387-110.1016/0021-9797(73)90387-1 ↗
26. 10.1039/B609547J10.1039/B609547J ↗
27. 10.1007/s00216-015-8858-010.1007/s00216-015-8858-0 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jtice.2017.02.00210.1016/j.jtice.2017.02.002 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jtice.2015.07.00210.1016/j.jtice.2015.07.002 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00007-410.1016/S0960-8524(01)00007-4 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsami.7b0460310.1021/acsami.7b04603 ↗
32. Martell A. E. · 199610.1007/978-1-4899-1486-6 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.desal.2008.04.00410.1016/j.desal.2008.04.004 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.08210.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.082 ↗
35. 10.1080/03067319.2016.125191310.1080/03067319.2016.1251913 ↗