Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jet Treatment of Poly-ε-caprolactone Polymer Solutions To Improve Electrospinning
Source abstract
Abstract
An atmospheric pressure plasma jet (APPJ) specifically designed for liquid treatment has been used in this work to improve the electrospinnability of a 5 w/v % solution of poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) in a mixture of chloroform and N, N -dimethylformamide. Untreated PCL solutions were found to result in nonuniform fibers containing a large number of beads, whereas plasma-treated solutions (exposure time of 2–5 min) enabled the generation of beadless, uniform nanofibers with an average diameter of 450 nm. This enhanced electrospinnability was found to be mainly due to the highly increased conductivity of the plasma-modified PCL solutions. Consequently, more stretching of the polymer jet occurred during electrospinning, leading to the generation of bead-free fibers. Plasma treatment also results in an increased viscosity and decreased pH values. To explain these observed changes, optical emission spectroscopy (OES) has been used to examine the excited species present in the APPJ in contact with the PCL solution. This study revealed that the peaks attributed to H, CH, CH 2, and C 2 species could be responsible for the degradation of solvent molecules and/or PCL structures during the plasma treatment. Size exclusion chromatography and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy results showed that the molecular weight and the chemical composition of PCL were not significantly affected by the APPJ treatment. Plasma exposure mainly results in the degradation of the solvent molecules instead of modifying the PCL macromolecules, preserving the original polymer as much as possible. A hypothesis for the observed macroscopic changes in viscosity and pH values could be the generation of new chemical species such as HCl and/or HNO 3 . These species are characterized by their high conductivity, low pH values, and strong polarity and could enhance the solvent quality for PCL, leading to the expansion of the polymer coil, which could in turn explain the observed enhanced viscosity after plasma modification.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Research Unit Plasma Technology (RUPT), Department of Applied Physics, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41 B4, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Department of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Supramolecular Chemistry Group, Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281 S4, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Funding
FP7 Ideas: European Research Council
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/s1359-0294(03)00004-910.1016/s1359-0294(03)00004-9 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.01.01410.1016/j.electacta.2010.01.014 ↗
3. 10.1002/adfm.20160235110.1002/adfm.201602351 ↗
4. 10.1039/c5py00060b10.1039/c5py00060b ↗
5. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.03110.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.031 ↗
6. 10.1002/app.3182510.1002/app.31825 ↗
7. 10.1039/b809074m10.1039/b809074m ↗
8. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.01.00410.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.01.004 ↗
9. Bosworth L. · 201110.1533/9780857092915 ↗
10. 10.1016/0304-3886(95)00041-810.1016/0304-3886(95)00041-8 ↗
11. 10.1089/ten.2006.12.119710.1089/ten.2006.12.1197 ↗
12. 10.1002/mame.20030022410.1002/mame.200300224 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10570-007-9113-410.1007/s10570-007-9113-4 ↗
14. 10.1166/jnn.2013.586310.1166/jnn.2013.5863 ↗
15. 10.1002/app.2549810.1002/app.25498 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.09.01410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.09.014 ↗
17. 10.1002/ppap.20130014110.1002/ppap.201300141 ↗
18. 10.1002/polb.2215710.1002/polb.22157 ↗
19. 10.1007/s11090-012-9419-310.1007/s11090-012-9419-3 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.09.06010.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.09.060 ↗
21. 10.1039/c0jm04502k10.1039/c0jm04502k ↗
22. 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00635-x10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00635-x ↗
23. 10.1002/jbm.a.3202310.1002/jbm.a.32023 ↗
24. 10.1002/jbm.a.3215710.1002/jbm.a.32157 ↗
25. 10.1016/s0042-207x(02)00765-010.1016/s0042-207x(02)00765-0 ↗
26. 10.1006/jcis.1996.458910.1006/jcis.1996.4589 ↗
27. 10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19960222)59:8<1281::aid-app11>3.0.co;2-910.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19960222)59:8<1281::aid-app11>3.0.co;2-9 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.05.07110.1016/j.apsusc.2011.05.071 ↗
29. 10.1088/0963-0252/20/1/01501410.1088/0963-0252/20/1/015014 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.343968510.1063/1.3439685 ↗
31. 10.1351/pac19855706086510.1351/pac198557060865 ↗
32. 10.1088/0963-0252/23/1/01501910.1088/0963-0252/23/1/015019 ↗
33. 10.1002/1097-4636(200105)55:2<203::aid-jbm1007>3.3.co;2-z10.1002/1097-4636(200105)55:2<203::aid-jbm1007>3.3.co;2-z ↗
34. Striegel A. M. · 200910.1002/9780470442876 ↗
35. 10.1002/marc.20040050310.1002/marc.200400503 ↗
36. 10.1089/ten.tec.2012.067110.1089/ten.tec.2012.0671 ↗
37. 10.1109/tia.2011.212743110.1109/tia.2011.2127431 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.02.00210.1016/j.polymer.2008.02.002 ↗
39. 10.1002/app.3545410.1002/app.35454 ↗