journal article·2021-09-01Open access

Bimodal Nanocomposite Platform with Antibiofilm and Self-Powering Functionalities for Biomedical Applications

Atul Dhall, Sayemul Islam, Moonchul Park, Yu Zhang, Albert Kim, Geelsu Hwang

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 13· Issue 34

Abstract

Advances in microelectronics and nanofabrication have led to the development of various implantable biomaterials. However, biofilm-associated infection on medical devices still remains a major hurdle that substantially undermines the clinical applicability and advancement of biomaterial systems. Given their attractive piezoelectric behavior, barium titanate (BTO)-based materials have also been used in biological applications. Despite its versatility, the feasibility of BTO-embedded biomaterials as anti-infectious implantable medical devices in the human body has not been explored yet. Here, the first demonstration of clinically viable BTO-nanocomposites is presented. It demonstrates potent antibiofilm properties against Streptococcus mutans without bactericidal effect while retaining their piezoelectric and mechanical behaviors. This antiadhesive effect led to ∼10-fold reduction in colony-forming units in vitro. To elucidate the underlying mechanism for this effect, data depicting unfavorable interaction energy profiles between BTO-nanocomposites and S. mutans using the classical and extended Derjaguin, Landau, Verwey, and Overbeek theories is presented. Direct cell-to-surface binding force data using atomic force microscopy also corroborate reduced adhesion between BTO-nanocomposites and S. mutans. Interestingly, the poling process on BTO-nanocomposites resulted in asymmetrical surface charge density on each side, which may help tackle two major issues in prosthetics—bacterial contamination and tissue integration. Finally, BTO-nanocomposites exhibit superior biocompatibility toward human gingival fibroblasts and keratinocytes. Overall, BTO-embedded composites exhibit broad-scale potential to be used in biological settings as energy-harvestable antibiofilm surfaces.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing · Polydiacetylene-based materials and applications · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Preventive and Restorative Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122, United States

Center for Innovation & Precision Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States

Funding

National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research · Division of Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. Lemons J. E. · 2015 · 6610.1016/B978-0-323-07845-0.00004-X ↗
2. 10.1007/s10856-015-5619-810.1007/s10856-015-5619-8 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.02.00910.1016/j.copbio.2016.02.009 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41579-018-0019-y10.1038/s41579-018-0019-y ↗
5. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.64372210.3389/fbioe.2021.643722 ↗
6. 10.1007/s00253-012-4144-710.1007/s00253-012-4144-7 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.08910.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.089 ↗
8. 10.1002/bit.2183810.1002/bit.21838 ↗
9. 10.1080/14670100.2016.122701910.1080/14670100.2016.1227019 ↗
10. 10.1056/NEJM20031030349181610.1056/NEJM200310303491816 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.microrel.2005.05.00810.1016/j.microrel.2005.05.008 ↗
12. 10.1021/cm900532q10.1021/cm900532q ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.05410910.1103/PhysRevB.80.054109 ↗
14. 10.1109/TUFFC.2013.269210.1109/TUFFC.2013.2692 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20140286810.1002/adma.201402868 ↗
16. 10.1038/srep4336010.1038/srep43360 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.06.10110.1016/j.matlet.2019.06.101 ↗
18. 10.1166/nmb.2015.101410.1166/nmb.2015.1014 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.06.10710.1016/j.matlet.2018.06.107 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.03.02910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.03.029 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10958410.1016/j.matdes.2021.109584 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41467-020-15015-310.1038/s41467-020-15015-3 ↗
23. 10.1002/adhm.20200065810.1002/adhm.202000658 ↗
24. 10.1038/srep0813610.1038/srep08136 ↗
25. 10.3389/fcimb.2020.62398010.3389/fcimb.2020.623980 ↗
26. 10.1080/08927014.2020.174860310.1080/08927014.2020.1748603 ↗
27. 10.1177/002203452095028610.1177/0022034520950286 ↗
28. 10.1371/journal.ppat.100262310.1371/journal.ppat.1002623 ↗
29. 10.1038/nmeth.201910.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
30. 10.1099/00221287-146-10-239510.1099/00221287-146-10-2395 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41467-020-15165-410.1038/s41467-020-15165-4 ↗
32. Vorregaard, M. Comstat2-A Modern 3D Image Analysis Environment for Biofilms Citeseer 2008.
33. 10.1021/acsami.7b1155810.1021/acsami.7b11558 ↗
34. ISO 10993-5: 2009 — Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices — Part 5: Tests for InVitro Cytotoxicity; International Standards Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
35. 10.3390/surfaces201000910.3390/surfaces2010009 ↗
36. 10.1021/jp200741v10.1021/jp200741v ↗
37. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.04.03110.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.04.031 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.03.10110.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.03.101 ↗
39. Rulison, C. So You Want to Measure Surface Energy 1999, 1 16.10.1016/B978-0-7506-4113-5.50003-6 ↗
40. 10.1007/s00396-012-2826-410.1007/s00396-012-2826-4 ↗
41. 10.1063/1.487007410.1063/1.4870074 ↗
42. van Oss C. J. · 2008 · 16 · 31
43. 10.1063/1.488168310.1063/1.4881683 ↗
44. ISO 4049 · 2019
45. Zumdahl S. S. · 2020
46. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.315810.1103/PhysRevB.54.3158 ↗
47. 10.1063/1.36709710.1063/1.367097 ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.02410710.1103/PhysRevB.70.024107 ↗
49. ISO 25178-2 · 2012
50. 10.1038/pj.2014.9110.1038/pj.2014.91 ↗
51. Dorranian D. · J. Non-Oxide Glasses · 2009 · 1 · 217
52. 10.1016/S0001-8686(02)00004-010.1016/S0001-8686(02)00004-0 ↗
53. 10.1016/S0168-6445(99)00004-210.1016/S0168-6445(99)00004-2 ↗
54. 10.1103/PhysRev.71.89010.1103/PhysRev.71.890 ↗
55. 10.1063/1.499004610.1063/1.4990046 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.dental.2016.09.03410.1016/j.dental.2016.09.034 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.dental.2017.10.00310.1016/j.dental.2017.10.003 ↗
58. 10.1002/adhm.20200077910.1002/adhm.202000779 ↗
59. 10.1073/pnas.132382911110.1073/pnas.1323829111 ↗
60. 10.1002/jbm.a.3592910.1002/jbm.a.35929 ↗
61. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0088310.1021/acs.langmuir.6b00883 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.07110.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.071 ↗
63. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.0019110.3389/fmicb.2019.00191 ↗
64. 10.2174/187421060090301022710.2174/1874210600903010227 ↗
65. 10.1159/00026140410.1159/000261404 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.10988310.1016/j.msec.2019.109883 ↗
67. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0251810.1021/acsomega.0c02518 ↗
68. 10.1039/C6NR00649C10.1039/C6NR00649C ↗
69. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.00410.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.004 ↗
70. 10.1080/17458080.2010.48369510.1080/17458080.2010.483695 ↗