journal article·2021-07-07Open access

Silk Hydrogel Substrate Stress Relaxation Primes Mesenchymal Stem Cell Behavior in 2D

Suttinee Phuagkhaopong, Luís Mendes, Katrin Müller, Manja Wobus, Martin Bornhäuser, Hilary V. O. Carswell, Iola F. Duarte, F. Philipp Seib

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 13· Issue 26

Abstract

Tissue-mimetic silk hydrogels are being explored for diverse healthcare applications, including stem cell delivery. However, the impact of stress relaxation of silk hydrogels on human mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) biology is poorly defined. The aim of this study was to fabricate silk hydrogels with tuned mechanical properties that allowed the regulation of MSC biology in two dimensions. The silk content and stiffness of both elastic and viscoelastic silk hydrogels were kept constant to permit direct comparisons. Gene expression of IL-1β, IL-6, LIF, BMP-6, BMP-7, and protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type C were substantially higher in MSCs cultured on elastic hydrogels than those on viscoelastic hydrogels, whereas this pattern was reversed for insulin, HNF-1A, and SOX-2. Protein expression was also mechanosensitive and the elastic cultures showed strong activation of IL-1β signaling in response to hydrogel mechanics. An elastic substrate also induced higher consumption of glucose and aspartate, coupled with a higher secretion of lactate, than was observed in MSCs grown on viscoelastic substrate. However, both silk hydrogels changed the magnitude of consumption of glucose, pyruvate, glutamine, and aspartate, and also metabolite secretion, resulting in an overall lower metabolic activity than that found in control cells. Together, these findings describe how stress relaxation impacts the overall biology of MSCs cultured on silk hydrogels.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · RNA Interference and Gene Delivery

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0RE, U.K.

CICECO − Aveiro Institute of Materials, Department of Chemistry, University of Aveiro, Aveiro 3810-193, Portugal

University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden 01307, Germany

Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (CRTD), Technical University Dresden, Dresden 01307, Germany

EPSRC Future Manufacturing Research Hub for Continuous Manufacturing and Advanced Crystallisation (CMAC), University of Strathclyde, Technology and Innovation Centre, Glasgow G1 1RD, U.K.

Leibniz Institute of Polymer Research Dresden, Max Bergmann Center of Biomaterials Dresden, Dresden 01069, Germany

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nm.302810.1038/nm.3028 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.stem.2018.05.00410.1016/j.stem.2018.05.004 ↗
3. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aam782810.1126/scitranslmed.aam7828 ↗
4. 10.1073/pnas.181941511610.1073/pnas.1819415116 ↗
5. 10.1038/nrm.2017.10810.1038/nrm.2017.108 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.04410.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 ↗
7. 10.1038/nmat448910.1038/nmat4489 ↗
8. 10.1073/pnas.171065311510.1073/pnas.1710653115 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsabm.9b0057610.1021/acsabm.9b00576 ↗
10. 10.1002/adhm.20180046510.1002/adhm.201800465 ↗
11. 10.1111/nyas.1288610.1111/nyas.12886 ↗
12. 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.3.27310.4048/jbc.2012.15.3.273 ↗
13. 10.4155/tde-2018-001610.4155/tde-2018-0016 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.11.00310.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.11.003 ↗
15. 10.1002/bab.155210.1002/bab.1552 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11623210.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116232 ↗
17. 10.1002/adhm.20190166710.1002/adhm.201901667 ↗
18. 10.1002/adhm.20200004110.1002/adhm.202000041 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.09.00510.1016/j.actbio.2015.09.005 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.03210.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.032 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.05110.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.051 ↗
22. 10.1002/term.199010.1002/term.1990 ↗
23. 10.3389/fncel.2018.0029610.3389/fncel.2018.00296 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b0102410.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01024 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41598-018-31905-510.1038/s41598-018-31905-5 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41598-019-45238-410.1038/s41598-019-45238-4 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.03410.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.034 ↗
28. 10.1038/nprot.2011.37910.1038/nprot.2011.379 ↗
29. 10.1002/adfm.20140052610.1002/adfm.201400526 ↗
30. 10.1021/ma061010910.1021/ma0610109 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.09.05110.1016/j.bbrc.2009.09.051 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41598-017-06794-910.1038/s41598-017-06794-9 ↗
33. 10.1080/1061186X.2017.136321210.1080/1061186X.2017.1363212 ↗
34. 10.1038/nrm.2017.8710.1038/nrm.2017.87 ↗
35. 10.1242/bio.03945310.1242/bio.039453 ↗
36. 10.1073/pnas.200880111710.1073/pnas.2008801117 ↗
37. 10.1186/2194-0517-2-1410.1186/2194-0517-2-14 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.04110.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.041 ↗
39. 10.1038/ncomms736510.1038/ncomms7365 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.02310.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.023 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.04.00310.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.04.003 ↗
42. 10.1247/csf.1201210.1247/csf.12012 ↗
43. 10.1038/nmat499310.1038/nmat4993 ↗
44. 10.1006/cyto.1996.007410.1006/cyto.1996.0074 ↗
45. 10.1002/advs.20180063810.1002/advs.201800638 ↗
46. 10.1038/nmat358610.1038/nmat3586 ↗
47. 10.1016/S1534-5807(04)00075-910.1016/S1534-5807(04)00075-9 ↗
48. 10.1089/scd.2016.034910.1089/scd.2016.0349 ↗
49. 10.1186/s13287-018-0982-210.1186/s13287-018-0982-2 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.04010.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.040 ↗
51. 10.3389/fimmu.2020.0095110.3389/fimmu.2020.00951 ↗
52. 10.2174/13862070978868191610.2174/138620709788681916 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.02.00510.1016/j.immuni.2015.02.005 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.04010.1016/j.cell.2018.08.040 ↗
55. 10.1021/acsami.8b1871610.1021/acsami.8b18716 ↗