journal article·2021-11-17

An Informatics Approach for Designing Conducting Polymers

Harikrishna Sahu, Hongmo Li, Lihua Chen, Arunkumar Chitteth Rajan, Chiho Kim, Natalie Stingelin, Rampi Ramprasad

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 13· Issue 45
Publisher page

Abstract

Doping conjugated polymers, which are potential candidates for the next generation of organic electronics, is an effective strategy for manipulating their electrical conductivity. However, selecting a suitable polymer-dopant combination is exceptionally challenging because of the vastness of the chemical, configurational, and morphological spaces one needs to search. In this work, high-performance surrogate models, trained on available experimentally measured data, are developed to predict the p-type electrical conductivity and are used to screen a large candidate hypothetical data set of more than 800 000 polymer-dopant combinations. Promising candidates are identified for synthesis and device fabrication. Additionally, new design guidelines are extracted that verify and extend knowledge on important molecular fragments that correlate to high conductivity. Conductivity prediction models are also deployed at www.polymergenome.org for broader open-access community use.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Conducting polymers and applications · Fuel Cells and Related Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States

Funding

Division of Materials Research

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.mtphys.2021.10040210.1016/j.mtphys.2021.100402 ↗
2. 10.1002/adfm.20200690010.1002/adfm.202006900 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41563-020-0778-510.1038/s41563-020-0778-5 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c0048010.1021/acs.accounts.0c00480 ↗
5. 10.1021/jacs.0c0569910.1021/jacs.0c05699 ↗
6. 10.1039/D0CS00204F10.1039/D0CS00204F ↗
7. 10.1039/C9SC02033K10.1039/C9SC02033K ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0129310.1021/acs.chemmater.0c01293 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2020.11635210.1016/j.synthmet.2020.116352 ↗
10. 10.1039/C8TA05922E10.1039/C8TA05922E ↗
11. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.5010.1038/natrevmats.2016.50 ↗
12. 10.1039/C6CS00149A10.1039/C6CS00149A ↗
13. 10.1039/C9TC05695E10.1039/C9TC05695E ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b0207010.1021/acs.jpclett.9b02070 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0008610.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00086 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41578-020-00255-y10.1038/s41578-020-00255-y ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b0047010.1021/acs.accounts.9b00470 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0038410.1021/acsnano.0c00384 ↗
19. 10.1002/aenm.20180103210.1002/aenm.201801032 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.mser.2020.10059510.1016/j.mser.2020.100595 ↗
21. Chandrasekaran A. · 2020
22. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0291310.1021/acs.jpcc.8b02913 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.11.02110.1016/j.mattod.2017.11.021 ↗
24. 10.1039/C5TA01252J10.1039/C5TA01252J ↗
25. 10.1109/TDEI.2010.549226810.1109/TDEI.2010.5492268 ↗
26. 10.1021/ma502424r10.1021/ma502424r ↗
27. 10.1039/D0TA02364G10.1039/D0TA02364G ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c0024610.1021/acs.jctc.0c00246 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.jpca.9b0273310.1021/acs.jpca.9b02733 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.jpca.9b0425610.1021/acs.jpca.9b04256 ↗
31. 10.1002/adts.20180013610.1002/adts.201800136 ↗
32. 10.1002/aic.1676010.1002/aic.16760 ↗
33. 10.1063/5.002375910.1063/5.0023759 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41563-018-0263-610.1038/s41563-018-0263-6 ↗
35. 10.1039/C8TC01593G10.1039/C8TC01593G ↗
36. 10.1002/adma.20170093010.1002/adma.201700930 ↗
37. 10.1039/C5TC04207K10.1039/C5TC04207K ↗
38. 10.1002/aenm.20140107210.1002/aenm.201401072 ↗
39. 10.1002/anie.20130239610.1002/anie.201302396 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.481006810.1063/1.4810068 ↗
41. 10.1002/pat.197210.1002/pat.1972 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2011.03.02410.1016/j.synthmet.2011.03.024 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2010.07.02510.1016/j.radphyschem.2010.07.025 ↗
44. 10.1002/polb.2199410.1002/polb.21994 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.08.00810.1016/j.polymer.2010.08.008 ↗
46. 10.1002/macp.20100024610.1002/macp.201000246 ↗
47. 10.1002/jccs.20090011010.1002/jccs.200900110 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.10.04110.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.10.041 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.11.12610.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.11.126 ↗
50. 10.1063/1.294065110.1063/1.2940651 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.03.04310.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.03.043 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.nimb.2006.08.00510.1016/j.nimb.2006.08.005 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.02.14010.1016/j.electacta.2005.02.140 ↗
54. 10.1002/app.2451310.1002/app.24513 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.msec.2004.11.00310.1016/j.msec.2004.11.003 ↗
56. Kier L. B. · 1999
57. RDKit: Cheminformatics and Machine Learning Software; Open-source, 2018. http://www.rdkit.org/.
58. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x ↗
59. 10.1038/sdata.2016.1210.1038/sdata.2016.12 ↗
60. Bicerano J. · 200210.1201/9780203910115 ↗
61. Mark J. · 1999
62. 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b0118810.1021/acs.jcim.9b01188 ↗
63. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c0166010.1021/acs.analchem.0c01660 ↗
64. 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b0097710.1021/acs.jcim.9b00977 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.cplett.2018.01.05210.1016/j.cplett.2018.01.052 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.cplett.2017.12.03410.1016/j.cplett.2017.12.034 ↗
67. 10.1039/C9TA04097H10.1039/C9TA04097H ↗
68. 10.1039/C3EE42756K10.1039/C3EE42756K ↗
69. 10.1016/j.joule.2017.10.00610.1016/j.joule.2017.10.006 ↗
70. 10.1002/cmdc.20080017810.1002/cmdc.200800178 ↗