Simple Preparation Method for Hydrophilic/Oleophobic Coatings
Source abstract
Abstract
This work provides a simple method to prepare a hydrophilic/oleophobic coating using polyester filter cloth as the substrate, a mixture of three hydrophilic polymers (poly(aspartic acid), poly(acrylic acid), and poly(vinyl alcohol)); SiO2 with an average particle size of 30 nm is used to improve the surface roughness of the filter cloth. Then, a long fluorocarbon chain of 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctyltriethoxysilane is grafted onto the surface by a vacuum silanization coupling reaction to obtain hydrophilic/oleophobic properties. The water and hexadecane contact angles of the treated filter cloth are 3 and 99.8°, respectively. A separation efficiency of 98% was achieved in hexadecane/water separation. The durability test shows that the separation efficiency of toward hexadecane–water mixture remains more than 98% after 20 cycles. The obtained material also presents a strong underwater antipollution property when using hexane, rapeseed oil, mineral oil, and pump oil as model pollutants. For oils with higher viscosity, the separation efficiency remains above 97%. However, the separation efficiency is ∼80% when treating emulsions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China
College of Materials and Energy, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510000, China
Funding
Foshan Nanhai Economic and Technological Promotion Bureau
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.est.7b0036310.1021/acs.est.7b00363 ↗
2. 10.1146/annurev-environ-100809-12534210.1146/annurev-environ-100809-125342 ↗
3. 10.1038/nature0659910.1038/nature06599 ↗
4. 10.1021/am508814g10.1021/am508814g ↗
5. Damian E. R. · Mecánica Computacional · 2012 · 31 · 3693
6. 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.06.00710.1016/j.seppur.2017.06.007 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jiec.2010.07.01810.1016/j.jiec.2010.07.018 ↗
8. 10.1021/ef301110m10.1021/ef301110m ↗
9. 10.1021/acsami.9b0129310.1021/acsami.9b01293 ↗
10. 10.1021/cm000123i10.1021/cm000123i ↗
11. 10.1002/app.1969.07013081510.1002/app.1969.070130815 ↗
12. 10.1002/adfm.20170686710.1002/adfm.201706867 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b0407110.1021/acs.iecr.8b04071 ↗
14. 10.1021/jp002234a10.1021/jp002234a ↗
15. 10.1039/C5RA04483A10.1039/C5RA04483A ↗
16. 10.1039/c2jm15987b10.1039/c2jm15987b ↗
17. 10.1007/s10570-014-0244-010.1007/s10570-014-0244-0 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0047410.1021/acsomega.0c00474 ↗
19. 10.1039/C6RA24474B10.1039/C6RA24474B ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.6b1096410.1021/acsami.6b10964 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0080210.1021/acs.langmuir.6b00802 ↗
22. 10.1006/jcis.2002.826210.1006/jcis.2002.8262 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.03.03810.1016/j.jcis.2018.03.038 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jtice.2016.11.02910.1016/j.jtice.2016.11.029 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.8b1646410.1021/acsami.8b16464 ↗