Exploring the Effects of Node Topology, Connectivity, and Metal Identity on the Binding of Nerve Agents and Their Hydrolysis Products in Metal–Organic Frameworks
Source abstract
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) built from hexanuclear M(IV) oxide cluster nodes are effective catalysts for nerve agent hydrolysis, where the properties of the active sites on the nodes can strongly influence the reaction energetics. The connectivity and metal identity of these M6 nodes can be easily tuned, offering extensive opportunities for computational screening to predict promising new materials. Thus, we used density functional theory (DFT) to examine the effects of node topology, connectivity, and metal identity on the binding energies of multiple nerve agents and their corresponding hydrolysis products. By computing an optimization metric based on the relative binding strengths of key hydrolysis reaction species (water, agent, and bidentate-bound products), we predicted optimal M6 nodes for hydrolyzing specific nerve agent and simulant molecules, where our results are in qualitative agreement with observed experimental trends. This analysis highlighted the notion that no single metal or node topology is optimal for all possible organophosphates, suggesting that MOFs should be selected based on the agent of interest. Using the large amount of data generated from our DFT calculations, we then derived quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models to help explain the complex trends observed in the binding energies. Through linear regression, we identified the most important descriptors for describing the binding of nerve agents and their hydrolysis products to M6 nodes. These results suggested that both molecular and node properties, including both structural and chemical features, collectively contribute to the binding energetics. By performing a thorough statistical analysis, we showed that our QSAR models are capable of making quantitatively accurate binding energy predictions for nerve agents and their hydrolysis products in a wide variety of M(IV)-MOFs. The insights gained herein can be used to guide future experiments for the synthesis of MOFs with enhanced catalytic activity for organophosphate hydrolysis.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Crystallography and molecular interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
Department of Chemistry, Chemical Theory Center and Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, 207 Pleasant Street Southeast, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
Funding
Army Research Office · Basic Energy Sciences · Air Force Office of Scientific Research · Office of Naval Research
References (79)
Show source-provided references
1. Walker P. F. · 2017 · 37910.1007/978-3-319-51664-6_20 ↗
2. Note by the Technical Secretariat: Report of the Fact-Finding Mission Regarding the Incident of Alleged Use of Toxic Chemicals as a Weapon in Douma, Syrian Arab Republic, on 7 April 2018; 2019; Vol. S/1731/201.
3. 10.1126/science.366.6464.40410.1126/science.366.6464.404 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0040210.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00402 ↗
5. 10.1002/minf.20180010610.1002/minf.201800106 ↗
6. 10.1021/acschemneuro.8b0014810.1021/acschemneuro.8b00148 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.11.04010.1016/j.toxlet.2017.11.040 ↗
8. 10.1177/088506660325865910.1177/0885066603258659 ↗
9. 10.1039/C7CS00108H10.1039/C7CS00108H ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ccr.2016.11.00810.1016/j.ccr.2016.11.008 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.8b0354410.1021/acsami.8b03544 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0364110.1021/acs.jpcc.8b03641 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0381710.1021/acs.jpcc.9b03817 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0483510.1021/acs.chemmater.6b04835 ↗
15. 10.1021/jacs.6b0006910.1021/jacs.6b00069 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b0174810.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b01748 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0096010.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00960 ↗
18. 10.1021/jacs.9b0260310.1021/jacs.9b02603 ↗
19. 10.1039/C9QI01218D10.1039/C9QI01218D ↗
20. 10.1039/C4CC10346G10.1039/C4CC10346G ↗
21. 10.1002/cphc.20170096710.1002/cphc.201700967 ↗
22. 10.1021/jacs.6b1137310.1021/jacs.6b11373 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0191310.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01913 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b1053010.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10530 ↗
25. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0359410.1021/acscatal.9b03594 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b0186710.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01867 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.04.04410.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.04.044 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
29. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.1425110.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.1324410.1103/PhysRevB.45.13244 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.338234410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.206526710.1063/1.2065267 ↗
38. 10.1021/jz501899j10.1021/jz501899j ↗
39. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Caricato, M.; Li, X.; Hratchian, H. P.; Izmaylov, A. F.; Bloino, J.; Zheng, G.; Sonnenberg, J. L.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Fox, D. J. Gaussian 09, revision D.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2013.
40. 10.1063/1.237099310.1063/1.2370993 ↗
41. 10.1039/b515623h10.1039/b515623h ↗
42. 10.1039/b508541a10.1039/b508541a ↗
43. 10.1007/BF0111453710.1007/BF01114537 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.45606610.1063/1.456066 ↗
45. Cramer C. J. · 2004
46. 10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x ↗
47. 10.1021/ar700111a10.1021/ar700111a ↗
48. 10.1021/jp810292n10.1021/jp810292n ↗
49. 10.1002/wcms.5110.1002/wcms.51 ↗
50. 10.1021/acsami.9b2015410.1021/acsami.9b20154 ↗
51. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0007010.1021/acs.jpcc.7b00070 ↗
52. 10.1038/nmat423810.1038/nmat4238 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b0180910.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b01809 ↗
54. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b0181310.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b01813 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e0315310.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03153 ↗
56. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0619810.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06198 ↗
57. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-510.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
58. 10.1039/C7TA10794C10.1039/C7TA10794C ↗
59. 10.1039/C9DT03710A10.1039/C9DT03710A ↗
60. 10.1021/acsami.9b0492710.1021/acsami.9b04927 ↗
61. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0412810.1021/acs.chemmater.7b04128 ↗
62. 10.1039/C8TA10682G10.1039/C8TA10682G ↗
63. 10.1039/C4CE01672F10.1039/C4CE01672F ↗
64. 10.1002/anie.20150215510.1002/anie.201502155 ↗
65. 10.1002/anie.20130752010.1002/anie.201307520 ↗
66. Kramida, A.; Ralchenko, Y.; Reader, J. Atomic Spectra Database; NIST, 2020. https://physics.nist.gov/asd (accessed Mar 15, 2020).
67. 10.1016/0040-4020(68)88057-310.1016/0040-4020(68)88057-3 ↗
68. 10.1016/S0031-8914(34)90011-210.1016/S0031-8914(34)90011-2 ↗
69. 10.1021/ja00005a07210.1021/ja00005a072 ↗
70. 10.1021/jm020017n10.1021/jm020017n ↗
71. Dragon, version 6.0; Talete, 2010. http://www.talete.mi.it/.
72. 10.1080/1062936970803913010.1080/10629369708039130 ↗
73. 10.1039/b801115j10.1039/b801115j ↗
74. 10.1002/chem.20190065510.1002/chem.201900655 ↗
75. 10.1080/08927022.2010.50332610.1080/08927022.2010.503326 ↗
76. 10.1016/S1093-3263(01)00123-110.1016/S1093-3263(01)00123-1 ↗
77. 10.1289/ehp.575810.1289/ehp.5758 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.aca.2012.11.00210.1016/j.aca.2012.11.002 ↗
79. 10.1126/sciadv.aat918010.1126/sciadv.aat9180 ↗