journal article·2020-02-12

Engineering Shelf-Stable Coating for Microfluidic Organ-on-a-Chip Using Bioinspired Catecholamine Polymers

Sultan Khetani, Kar Wey Yong, Vinayaraj Ozhukil Kollath, Erin Eastick, Milad Azarmanesh, Kunal Karan, Arindom Sen, Amir Sanati-Nezhad

Publisher page

Abstract

The conceptualization of body-on-a-chip in 2004 resulted in a new approach for studying human physiology in three-dimensional culture. Despite pioneering works and the progress made in replicating human physiology on-a-chip, the stability, reliability, and preservation of cell-culture-treated microfluidic chips remain a challenge. The development of a reliable surface treatment technique to more efficiently and reproducibly modify microfluidic channels would significantly simplify the process of creating and implementing organ-on-a-chip (OOC) systems. In this work, a new flow-based coating technique using bioinspired polymers was implemented to create reliable, reproducible, ready-to-use microfluidic cell culture chips for OOC studies. Single-channel polydimethylsiloxane microfluidic chips were coated with the bioinspired catecholamine polymers, polydopamine (PDA) and polynorepinephrine (PNE), using a flow-based coating technique. The functionality of the resulting microfluidic chips was evaluated by extensive surface characterizations, at 130 °C, in the presence of various cleaning and culture media in static and flow conditions regularly used in OOCs and tested for shelf life by storing the coated microfluidic chips for 4 months at room temperature. Microfluidic chips coated with polycatecholamine were then seeded with the mouse cancer cell line Cath.a.differentiated (CAD) and with the normal human cerebral microvascular endothelial cell line human cerebral microvascular endothelial cells (hCMEC)/D3. Cell viability, cell phenotype, and cell functionality were assessed to evaluate the performance of both the coatings and the surface treatment technique. Both PDA- and PNE-coated microfluidic chips maintained high viability, phenotype, and functionality of CAD cells and hCMEC/D3 cells. In addition, CAD cells retained high viability when they were cultured in both the polymer-coated chips, which were stored at room temperature for up to 120 days. These results suggest that flow-based techniques to coat surfaces with polycatecholamines can be used to generate ready-to-use microfluidic OOC chips that offer long-term stability and reliability for the culture of cell types with application in pathophysiological studies and drug screening.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

BioMEMS and Bioinspired Microfluidic Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada

Center for Bioengineering Research and Education, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada

Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada

Pharmaceutical Production Research Facility, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada

Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada

Funding

Canada Research Chairs · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada · CMC Microsystems · Alberta Innovates Bio Solutions · Alberta Prion Research Institute

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/bp034199610.1021/bp0341996 ↗
2. 10.1021/bp034077d10.1021/bp034077d ↗
3. 10.1126/science.118830210.1126/science.1188302 ↗
4. 10.1073/pnas.161290611410.1073/pnas.1612906114 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.drudis.2017.06.01010.1016/j.drudis.2017.06.010 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.07.02810.1016/j.actbio.2017.07.028 ↗
7. 10.1039/C9TA03661J10.1039/C9TA03661J ↗
8. 10.1039/C7LC01357D10.1039/C7LC01357D ↗
9. 10.1039/C6NR06417E10.1039/C6NR06417E ↗
10. 10.1016/j.mattod.2016.07.00110.1016/j.mattod.2016.07.001 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.495515510.1063/1.4955155 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.chom.2017.11.00910.1016/j.chom.2017.11.009 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.bios.2016.01.06010.1016/j.bios.2016.01.060 ↗
14. Reeves, J. P.; Khetani, S.; Sanati-Nezhad, A. Thin Film Silicon Biosensor for the Detection of Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), CMBES Proceedings, 2017; Vol. 40.
15. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b0064310.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00643 ↗
16. 10.1002/smll.20180236810.1002/smll.201802368 ↗
17. 10.1039/C9MH01283D10.1039/C9MH01283D ↗
18. 10.1002/admt.20190047810.1002/admt.201900478 ↗
19. 10.1002/elps.20110048210.1002/elps.201100482 ↗
20. 10.1002/elps.20090047510.1002/elps.200900475 ↗
21. 10.1002/adfm.20120115610.1002/adfm.201201156 ↗
22. 10.1021/la502486e10.1021/la502486e ↗
23. 10.1002/adhm.20170042610.1002/adhm.201700426 ↗
24. 10.3390/mi709016210.3390/mi7090162 ↗
25. 10.1073/pnas.152255611310.1073/pnas.1522556113 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.01.02410.1016/j.jconrel.2018.01.024 ↗
27. 10.1002/adhm.20160043910.1002/adhm.201600439 ↗
28. 10.1039/c3ib40049b10.1039/c3ib40049b ↗
29. 10.1038/nm.354510.1038/nm.3545 ↗
30. 10.1002/bit.2678710.1002/bit.26787 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.01.01310.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.01.013 ↗
32. 10.1038/nprot.2013.13710.1038/nprot.2013.137 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.supflu.2015.08.01910.1016/j.supflu.2015.08.019 ↗
34. 10.1021/acssensors.8b0007610.1021/acssensors.8b00076 ↗
35. Khetani, S.; Kundra, V.; Sanati-Nezhad, A. Synthesis of Highly Sensitive Graphene Nanocomposite for Biosensing Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP), CMBES Proceedings, 2017.
36. 10.1039/C6LC01554A10.1039/C6LC01554A ↗
37. 10.1039/C8RA05372C10.1039/C8RA05372C ↗
38. 10.1016/j.bios.2019.11171510.1016/j.bios.2019.111715 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.02.16910.1016/j.snb.2017.02.169 ↗
40. 10.1126/science.114724110.1126/science.1147241 ↗
41. 10.1002/admi.20160119210.1002/admi.201601192 ↗
42. 10.1021/la102825p10.1021/la102825p ↗
43. 10.1155/2014/79305210.1155/2014/793052 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jiec.2015.11.01510.1016/j.jiec.2015.11.015 ↗
45. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-04-01217.199710.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-04-01217.1997 ↗
46. 10.1002/adem.20108002310.1002/adem.201080023 ↗
47. 10.1038/s41598-018-34001-w10.1038/s41598-018-34001-w ↗
48. 10.1021/la202877k10.1021/la202877k ↗
49. 10.1016/j.nano.2016.12.00810.1016/j.nano.2016.12.008 ↗
50. 10.1039/C6CP04457C10.1039/C6CP04457C ↗
51. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0031710.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00317 ↗
52. 10.1038/srep3241810.1038/srep32418 ↗
53. 10.1021/ar500273y10.1021/ar500273y ↗
54. 10.1038/nchembio.63010.1038/nchembio.630 ↗
55. 10.1002/anie.20080378610.1002/anie.200803786 ↗
56. 10.1039/C4CC02961E10.1039/C4CC02961E ↗
57. 10.1116/1.487511510.1116/1.4875115 ↗
58. 10.1073/pnas.060555210310.1073/pnas.0605552103 ↗
59. 10.1002/macp.20160032810.1002/macp.201600328 ↗
60. 10.1021/am200532j10.1021/am200532j ↗
61. 10.3390/ma1203050010.3390/ma12030500 ↗
62. 10.1002/anie.20130164610.1002/anie.201301646 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.00210.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.002 ↗
64. 10.1021/acsami.6b1560110.1021/acsami.6b15601 ↗
65. 10.1021/la502660810.1021/la5026608 ↗
66. Reddy, S.; Stephan, C. Analysis of Surface Bound Organic Ligands on Gold Nanomaterials Using Direct Sample Analysis–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry; PerkinElmer Inc., 2015; pp 1–4 (https://www.xintuo888.cn/lab-solutions/resources/docs/APP_Analysis-of-Organic-Ligands-on-Gold-Nanomaterials-Using-DSA-TOF-MS-012152_01.pdf).
67. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0314310.1021/acs.langmuir.7b03143 ↗
68. 10.1002/jssc.20120007310.1002/jssc.201200073 ↗
69. 10.1248/bpb.b12-0091510.1248/bpb.b12-00915 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.05.02210.1016/j.brainres.2014.05.022 ↗