journal article·2019-11-27

Application of Zr-Cluster-Based MOFs for the Adsorptive Removal of Aliphatic Aldehydes (C1 to C5) from an Industrial Solvent

Kumar Vikrant, Ya-Xin Deng, Ki-Hyun Kim, Sherif A. Younis, Danil W. Boukhvalov, Wha-Seung Ahn, Akash Deep

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 11· Issue 47
Publisher page

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are recognized as advanced sorbents for the effective removal and recovery of various hazardous pollutants in liquid and gaseous environments. In this research, the potential applicability of two Zr-based MOFs (UiO-66 (U6) and its amine counterpart UiO-66-NH2 (U6N)) was investigated relative to activated carbon (AC, tested as a reference adsorbent) for the purification of industrial organic solvents (e.g., methanol) from six different carbonyl impurities (CCs (C1 to C5): formaldehyde (FA, CH2O), acetaldehyde (AA, CH3CHO), propionaldehyde (PA, C3H6O), butyraldehyde (BA, C4H8O), isovaleraldehyde (IA, C5H10O), and valeraldehyde (VA, C5H10O)). In the sorptive removal of these CCs (both individually and in binary mixtures with FA), U6N showed higher efficacy in capturing all of the target CCs than U6 and AC. The adsorption selectivity of U6N toward single CC compounds was in the order of PA (165.1 mg g–1) > BA (158.9 mg g–1) > IA (154 mg g–1) > AA (136 mg g–1) > VA (131.5 mg g–1) > FA (120 mg g–1). In all binary mixtures, U6N selectively captured FA over the heavier CCs (C2–C5) by 1.5–3.3 times due to the steric hindrance of the C2–C5 aliphatic tails in the pore diffusion mechanism. The preferential adsorption of FA onto U6N can also be accounted for by the contribution of chemical bonding (Schiff base interaction) between the −NH2 groups in U6N and the C═O functionalities (aldehyde molecules) and physisorption, as confirmed by density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Theoretical DFT simulations also revealed that the competition between aldehyde molecules for Brønsted acidic sites (μ3-OH of Zr-clusters) created minor distortions in the U6/U6N frameworks.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Covalent Organic Framework Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-Ro, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea

Science and Technology on Reactor System Design Technology Laboratory, Nuclear Power Institution of China, Chengdu 610213, China

Analysis and Evaluation Department, Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute (EPRI), Nasr City, Cairo 11727, Egypt

College of Science, Institute of Materials Physics and Chemistry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

Theoretical Physics and Applied Mathematics Department, Ural Federal University, Mira Street 19, Yekaterinburg 620002, Russia

Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Inha University, Incheon 402-751, Republic of Korea

Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Lab, Central Scientific Instruments Organization (CSIR-CSIO), Sector 30 C, Chandigarh 160030, India

Funding

Ministry of Environment · Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b0611510.1021/acs.iecr.8b06115 ↗
2. 10.1039/C9TA00798A10.1039/C9TA00798A ↗
3. Brusseau M. L. · 2019 · 17510.1016/B978-0-12-814719-1.00012-4 ↗
4. Marcus Y. · 2019 · 18510.1007/978-3-030-00608-2_6 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.12.13010.1016/j.fuel.2018.12.130 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.oprd.7b0023110.1021/acs.oprd.7b00231 ↗
7. 10.3791/5763910.3791/57639 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.8b1747910.1021/acsami.8b17479 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.11.01710.1016/j.jwpe.2018.11.017 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b0130410.1021/acs.biochem.7b01304 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jece.2019.10288310.1016/j.jece.2019.102883 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cogsc.2019.02.00510.1016/j.cogsc.2019.02.005 ↗
13. 10.3390/resources802011510.3390/resources8020115 ↗
14. Cantwell F. F. · 2002 · 297
15. 10.1016/j.trac.2017.08.01510.1016/j.trac.2017.08.015 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.04.04910.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.04.049 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.07.07810.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.07.078 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.physe.2014.01.01910.1016/j.physe.2014.01.019 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.05.02310.1016/j.carbon.2018.05.023 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.12.01110.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.12.011 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.10.00310.1016/j.ccr.2018.10.003 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jiec.2017.12.05110.1016/j.jiec.2017.12.051 ↗
23. 10.1039/C5TA07068F10.1039/C5TA07068F ↗
24. 10.1039/C7TA07847A10.1039/C7TA07847A ↗
25. 10.1038/s41598-018-23391-610.1038/s41598-018-23391-6 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.envres.2019.10867210.1016/j.envres.2019.108672 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.03810.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.038 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.envres.2019.01.05010.1016/j.envres.2019.01.050 ↗
29. 10.1088/0953-8984/14/11/30210.1088/0953-8984/14/11/302 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.09610210.1103/PhysRevLett.103.096102 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.199310.1103/PhysRevB.43.1993 ↗
33. 10.1021/cm102288210.1021/cm1022882 ↗
34. 10.1002/chem.20130495410.1002/chem.201304954 ↗
35. 10.1039/c3cp44381g10.1039/c3cp44381g ↗
36. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.19310.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.193 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.09.20210.1016/j.cej.2018.09.202 ↗
38. 10.3390/su1008266910.3390/su10082669 ↗
39. 10.1021/je200041410.1021/je2000414 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.04.04210.1016/j.jcis.2004.04.042 ↗
41. 10.1039/C6DT01696K10.1039/C6DT01696K ↗
42. 10.1021/ic800400810.1021/ic8004008 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.chemphys.2013.05.01710.1016/j.chemphys.2013.05.017 ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b0266810.1021/acs.iecr.8b02668 ↗