journal article·2022-02-23

Low-Cost Flexible Glass-Based pH Sensor via Cold Atmospheric Plasma Deposition

Venkat Kasi, Sotoudeh Sedaghat, Alejandro M Alcaraz, Murali Kannan Maruthamuthu, Ulisses Heredia-Rivera, Sina Nejati, Juliane Nguyen, Rahim Rahimi

Publisher page

Abstract

Many commercially available pH sensors are fabricated with a glass membrane as the sensing component because of several advantages of glass-based electrodes such as versatility, high accuracy, and excellent stability in various conditions. However, because of their bulkiness and poor mechanical properties, conventional glass-based sensors are not ideal for wearable or flexible applications. Here, we report for the first time the fabrication of a flexible glass-based pH sensor suitable for biomedical and environmental applications where flexibility and stability of the sensor are critical for long-term and real-time monitoring. The sensor was fabricated via a simple and facile approach using the cold atmospheric plasma technique in which a pH sensitive silica coating was deposited from a siloxane precursor onto a carbon electrode. In order to increase the sensitivity and stability of the sensor, we employed a postprocessing step which involves annealing of the silica coated electrode at elevated temperatures. This process was optimized to ensure that the crucial properties such as porosity and hydration functionality were balanced to obtain the best and most reliable sensitivity of the sensor. Our sensitivity test results indicated that these sensors exhibit excellent and stable sensitivity with a slope of about 48 mV/pH (r2 = 0.998) and selectivity across a pH range of 4 to 10 in the presence of various cations. The optimized sensor has shown stable sensitivity for a long period of time (30 h of immersion) and in different bending conditions. We demonstrate in this investigation that this flexible cost-effective pH sensor can withstand the sterilization process resulting from ultraviolet radiation and shows repeatable sensitivity with less than ±5 mV potential drift from the sensitivity values of the standard optimized sensor.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Material Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, United States

Birck Nanotechnology Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, United States

Division of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States

Funding

SMART Films Consortium at Birck Nanotechnology Center, Purdue University · School of Material Engineering, Purdue University

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/JPROC.2012.219016810.1109/JPROC.2012.2190168 ↗
2. Jayswal S. · J. Adv. Comput. Commun. Technol. · 2017 · 5 · 6
3. 10.3389/felec.2020.59400310.3389/felec.2020.594003 ↗
4. 10.1109/JSEN.2017.270570010.1109/JSEN.2017.2705700 ↗
5. 10.3390/BIOS1007007610.3390/BIOS10070076 ↗
6. 10.1007/s00604-014-1181-110.1007/s00604-014-1181-1 ↗
7. 10.3389/fmats.2018.0007710.3389/fmats.2018.00077 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsanm.0c0065910.1021/acsanm.0c00659 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsabm.9b0103210.1021/acsabm.9b01032 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsaelm.1c0034510.1021/acsaelm.1c00345 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jece.2020.10410910.1016/j.jece.2020.104109 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.aca.2012.05.01810.1016/j.aca.2012.05.018 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0065510.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00655 ↗
14. 10.1007/s00542-017-3495-510.1007/s00542-017-3495-5 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0045110.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00451 ↗
16. 10.1088/0957-0233/20/4/04200210.1088/0957-0233/20/4/042002 ↗
17. 10.1021/cr068100w10.1021/cr068100w ↗
18. 10.1080/10408347.2019.171101310.1080/10408347.2019.1711013 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c0424910.1021/acs.analchem.0c04249 ↗
20. 10.1002/bbpc.1973077091810.1002/bbpc.19730770918 ↗
21. 10.1039/d0ra00016g10.1039/d0ra00016g ↗
22. Rahimi, R.; Brener, U.; Ochoa, M.; Ziaie, B. Flexible and Transparent PH Monitoring System with NFC Communication for Wound Monitoring Applications. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) 2017, 125 −128.10.1109/MEMSYS.2017.7863356 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.sna.2021.11254310.1016/j.sna.2021.112543 ↗
24. Serhan, M.; Sprowls, M.; Jackemeyer, D.; Long, M.; Perez, I. D.; Maret, W.; Tao, N.; Forzani, E. Total Iron Measurement in Human Serum with a Smartphone. AIChE Annual Meeting, Conference Proceedings 2019, 2019.10.1109/JTEHM.2020.3005308 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14595610.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145956 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.snb.2015.12.08210.1016/j.snb.2015.12.082 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.6b1622810.1021/acsami.6b16228 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.03.00810.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.03.008 ↗
29. 10.1007/BF0053565010.1007/BF00535650 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.snb.2015.12.08310.1016/j.snb.2015.12.083 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.sna.2005.03.00610.1016/j.sna.2005.03.006 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.09.06910.1016/j.talanta.2015.09.069 ↗
33. 10.1109/JSEN.2006.88136410.1109/JSEN.2006.881364 ↗
34. 10.3390/s1606083910.3390/s16060839 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.elecom.2009.03.00610.1016/j.elecom.2009.03.006 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0167-2738(00)00282-410.1016/S0167-2738(00)00282-4 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.10063510.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100635 ↗
38. 10.1016/0250-6874(84)80004-910.1016/0250-6874(84)80004-9 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.sna.2011.05.01610.1016/j.sna.2011.05.016 ↗
40. 10.1039/c9ra09188b10.1039/c9ra09188b ↗
41. 10.1039/c5ra11291e10.1039/c5ra11291e ↗
42. 10.3389/fchem.2019.0039910.3389/fchem.2019.00399 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.10.03710.1016/j.snb.2017.10.037 ↗
44. 10.1039/c8ra09577a10.1039/c8ra09577a ↗
45. 10.1021/acsami.7b0706310.1021/acsami.7b07063 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.02.08710.1016/j.snb.2018.02.087 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2009.09.03310.1016/j.synthmet.2009.09.033 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.bios.2018.02.02510.1016/j.bios.2018.02.025 ↗
49. 10.1149/2.F02042IF10.1149/2.F02042IF ↗
50. 10.1016/j.tsf.2012.01.02610.1016/j.tsf.2012.01.026 ↗
51. 10.1038/s41598-018-35154-410.1038/s41598-018-35154-4 ↗
52. 10.1021/am301723d10.1021/am301723d ↗
53. 10.3390/ma1313293110.3390/ma13132931 ↗
54. 10.1063/1.37298410.1063/1.372984 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2008.08.02510.1016/j.molstruc.2008.08.025 ↗
56. 10.1016/S0022-3093(01)00418-510.1016/S0022-3093(01)00418-5 ↗
57. 10.3390/ijms13121592510.3390/ijms131215925 ↗
58. 10.1364/oe.16.02002910.1364/oe.16.020029 ↗
59. 10.1016/S0022-3093(05)80555-110.1016/S0022-3093(05)80555-1 ↗
60. 10.1134/1.113116910.1134/1.1131169 ↗
61. Ramakrishna, S.; Tian, L.; Wang, C.; Liao, S.; Teo, W. E. Safety Testing of a New Medical Device. Medical Devices 2015, 137 −153.10.1016/B978-0-08-100289-6.00006-5 ↗
62. 10.1038/s41528-021-00107-x10.1038/s41528-021-00107-x ↗
63. 10.1021/acsami.8b1099110.1021/acsami.8b10991 ↗
64. 10.1590/S1516-8913201400500000710.1590/S1516-89132014005000007 ↗