journal article·2022-02-09

Operando Imaging of Ce Radical Scavengers in a Practical Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell by 3D Fluorescence CT–XAFS and Depth-Profiling Nano-XAFS–SEM/EDS Techniques

Hirosuke Matsui, Shinobu Takao, Kotaro Higashi, Takuma Kaneko, Gabor Samjeské, Tomoya Uruga, Mizuki Tada, Yasuhiro Iwasawa

Publisher page

Abstract

There is little information on the spatial distribution, migration, and valence of Ce species doped as an efficient radical scavenger in a practical polymer electrolyte fuel cell (PEFC) for commercial fuel cell vehicles (FCVs) closely related to a severe reliability issue for long-term PEFC operation. An in situ three-dimensional fluorescence computed tomography–X-ray absorption fine structure (CT–XAFS) imaging technique and an in situ same-view nano-XAFS–scanning electron microscopy (SEM)/energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS) combination technique were applied for the first time to perform operando spatial visualization and depth-profiling analysis of Ce radical scavengers in a practical PEFC of Toyota MIRAI FCV under PEFC operating conditions. Using these in situ techniques, we successfully visualized and analyzed the domain, density, valence, and migration of Ce scavengers that were heterogeneously distributed in the components of PEFC, such as anode microporous layer, anode catalyst layer, polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM), cathode catalyst layer, and cathode microporous layer. The average Ce valence states in the whole PEFC and PEM were 3.9+ and 3.4+, respectively, and the Ce3+/Ce4+ ratios in the PEM under H2 (anode)–N2 (cathode) at an open-circuit voltage (OCV), H2–air at 0.2 A cm–2, and H2–air at 0.0 A cm–2 were 70 ± 5:30 ± 5%, as estimated by both in situ fluorescence CT–X-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy (XANES) and nano-XANES–SEM/EDS techniques. The Ce3+ migration rates in the electrolyte membrane toward the anode and cathode electrodes ranged from 0.3 to 3.8 μm h–1, depending on the PEFC operating conditions. Faster Ce3+ migration was not observed with voltage transient response processes by highly time-resolved (100 ms) and spatially resolved (200 nm) nano-XANES imaging. Ce3+ ions were suggested to be coordinated with both Nafion sulfonate (Nfsul) groups and water to form [Ce(Nfsul)x(H2O)y]3+. The Ce migration behavior may also be affected by the spatial density of Ce, interactions of Ce with Nafion, thickness and states of the PEM, and H2O convection, in addition to the PEFC operating conditions. The unprecedented operando imaging of Ce radical scavengers in the practical PEFCs by both in situ three-dimensional (3D) fluorescence CT–XAFS imaging and in situ depth-profiling nano-XAFS–SEM/EDS techniques yields intriguing insights into the spatial distribution, chemical states, and behavior of Ce scavengers under the working conditions for the development of next-generation PEFCs with high long-term reliability and durability.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8602, Japan

Innovation Research Center for Fuel Cells, The University of Electro-Communications, Chofugaoka, Chofu, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan

Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute, SPring-8, Sayo, Hyogo 679-5198, Japan

Research Center for Materials Science, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8602, Japan

Department of Engineering Science, Graduate School of Informatics and Engineering, The University of Electro-Communications, Chofugaoka, Chofu, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan

Funding

New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature1111510.1038/nature11115 ↗
2. 10.1021/cs300086410.1021/cs3000864 ↗
3. 10.1038/nmat366810.1038/nmat3668 ↗
4. 10.1038/nmat345810.1038/nmat3458 ↗
5. 10.1021/ar300359w10.1021/ar300359w ↗
6. 10.1126/science.124906110.1126/science.1249061 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.aaa876510.1126/science.aaa8765 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.aab080110.1126/science.aab0801 ↗
9. 10.1021/jacs.5b0425610.1021/jacs.5b04256 ↗
10. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0096410.1021/acscatal.7b00964 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0046210.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00462 ↗
12. 10.1126/science.aah613310.1126/science.aah6133 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.aaf905010.1126/science.aaf9050 ↗
14. 10.1126/science.aad889210.1126/science.aad8892 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.aad499810.1126/science.aad4998 ↗
16. Coms F. D. · 2018
17. Borup, R.; More, K.; Weber, A. DOE Fuel Cell Technologies Office Annual Merit Review; DOE Fuel Cell Technologies Office, June 14, 2018.
18. 10.1002/anie.20060473210.1002/anie.200604732 ↗
19. 10.1021/cs300228p10.1021/cs300228p ↗
20. 10.1021/jp402438e10.1021/jp402438e ↗
21. 10.1021/jp504738p10.1021/jp504738p ↗
22. 10.1016/j.susc.2015.10.05310.1016/j.susc.2015.10.053 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0443710.1021/acs.jpcc.6b04437 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0856910.1021/acs.jpcc.6b08569 ↗
25. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0005210.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00052 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0726410.1021/acs.jpcc.7b07264 ↗
27. 10.1002/anie.20120447810.1002/anie.201204478 ↗
28. 10.1002/anie.20170394010.1002/anie.201703940 ↗
29. 10.1002/tcr.20180012310.1002/tcr.201800123 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0500510.1021/acs.jpcc.9b05005 ↗
31. 10.1039/D0CP01356K10.1039/D0CP01356K ↗
32. 10.1002/anie.20140884510.1002/anie.201408845 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0075010.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00750 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsami.8b0440710.1021/acsami.8b04407 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsami.9b1639310.1021/acsami.9b16393 ↗
36. 10.1007/s10562-014-1428-910.1007/s10562-014-1428-9 ↗
37. Lohse-Busch, H.; Duoba, M.; Stutenberg, K.; Iliev, S.; Kern, M.; Richards, B.; Christenson, M.; Loiselle-Lapointe, A. FY 2018 Annual Progress Report, DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program; Argonne National Laboratory, 2018.
38. 10.1021/cr050182l10.1021/cr050182l ↗
39. Tada M. · 2017 · 33510.1007/978-3-319-43866-5_22 ↗
40. 10.1038/ncomms381710.1038/ncomms3817 ↗
41. 10.1002/tcr.20180019310.1002/tcr.201800193 ↗
42. 10.1149/1.298201510.1149/1.2982015 ↗
43. Kawazoe, H.; Endoh, E.; Nakagawa, H. Liquid Composition, Process for Its Production and Process for Producing Membrane-Electrode Assembly for Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell. US2006/0019140A1, 2006.
44. Endoh, E. WO2006006357, 2006.
45. Coms, F. D.; O’Hara, J. E. US20,080,107,945A1, 2006.
46. 10.1149/1.298199710.1149/1.2981997 ↗
47. Borup, R. Fuel Cell Performance and Durability Consortium 2017, DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program10.2172/1238130 ↗
48. U.S. Department of Energy, June 6, 2017.
49. 10.1039/c1cc15155j10.1039/c1cc15155j ↗
50. 10.1149/2.056301jes10.1149/2.056301jes ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.10.01510.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.10.015 ↗
52. 10.3390/en1321561110.3390/en13215611 ↗
53. 10.1002/aenm.20160210010.1002/aenm.201602100 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.07.01410.1016/j.memsci.2012.07.014 ↗
55. 10.1021/jp507839910.1021/jp5078399 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.03.01010.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.03.010 ↗
57. 10.1021/acsami.9b1805910.1021/acsami.9b18059 ↗
58. 10.1149/1.291644310.1149/1.2916443 ↗
59. 10.1063/1.55580510.1063/1.555805 ↗
60. 10.1149/2.075202jes10.1149/2.075202jes ↗
61. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.22744710.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227447 ↗
62. 10.1149/2.0311806jes10.1149/2.0311806jes ↗
63. 10.1149/2.0241806jes10.1149/2.0241806jes ↗
64. 10.1073/pnas.111467210910.1073/pnas.1114672109 ↗
65. 10.1039/C5RA20291D10.1039/C5RA20291D ↗
66. 10.1149/2.008404eel10.1149/2.008404eel ↗
67. 10.1149/2.0181609jes10.1149/2.0181609jes ↗
68. 10.1149/08008.0633ecst10.1149/08008.0633ecst ↗
69. Kumaraguru, S. General Motors, 2018 DOE Fuel Cell Technologies Office Annual Merit Review; Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office, June 14, 2018.