journal article·2020-12-30

Ductile Shape-Memory Polymer Composite with Enhanced Shape Recovery Ability

Kaiyuan Peng, Yao Zhao, Shima Shahab, Reza Mirzaeifar

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 12· Issue 52
Publisher page

Abstract

In recent years, shape-memory polymers (SMPs) have received extensive attention to be used as actuators in a broad range of applications such as medical and robotic devices. Their ability to recover large deformations and their capability to be stimulated remotely have made SMPs a superior choice among different smart materials in various applications. In this study, a ductile SMP composite with enhanced shape recovery ability is synthesized and characterized. This SMP composite is made by a mixture of acrylate-based crosslinkers and monomers, as well as polystyrene (PS) with UV curing. The composite can achieve almost 100% shape recovery in 2 s by hot water or hot air. This shape recovery speed is much faster than typical acrylate-based SMPs. In addition, the composite shows excellent ductility and viscoelasticity with reduced hardness. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are performed for understanding the curing mechanism of this composite. With the combination of the experimental and computational works, this study paves the way in front of designing and optimizing the future SMP devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer composites and self-healing · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States

Funding

National Science Foundation

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/1521-3773(20020617)41:12<2034::AID-ANIE2034>3.0.CO;2-M10.1002/1521-3773(20020617)41:12<2034::AID-ANIE2034>3.0.CO;2-M ↗
2. 10.1039/b615954k10.1039/b615954k ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20090444710.1002/adma.200904447 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.07.04810.1016/j.cej.2018.07.048 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsami.7b0571310.1021/acsami.7b05713 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20190665710.1002/adma.201906657 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20180774710.1002/adma.201807747 ↗
8. 10.1002/mabi.20200010810.1002/mabi.202000108 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.03.02410.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.03.024 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsami.6b0690010.1021/acsami.6b06900 ↗
11. 10.1039/C7RA07396H10.1039/C7RA07396H ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.11870010.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118700 ↗
13. 10.1088/1748-6041/2/1/S0410.1088/1748-6041/2/1/S04 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20150541710.1002/adma.201505417 ↗
15. 10.1016/S1876-3804(16)30128-810.1016/S1876-3804(16)30128-8 ↗
16. 10.1039/C4TB01155D10.1039/C4TB01155D ↗
17. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.16710.1016/j.cej.2019.05.167 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10965-012-9952-z10.1007/s10965-012-9952-z ↗
19. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/12/12504110.1088/0964-1726/23/12/125041 ↗
20. 10.3390/polym907028710.3390/polym9070287 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.01.03510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.01.035 ↗
22. 10.1007/s00161-011-0187-810.1007/s00161-011-0187-8 ↗
23. 10.1023/A:100469232924710.1023/A:1004692329247 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.03010.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.030 ↗
25. 10.1002/jbm.a.3029610.1002/jbm.a.30296 ↗
26. 10.1586/erd.10.810.1586/erd.10.8 ↗
27. 10.1038/srep2422410.1038/srep24224 ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20150313210.1002/adma.201503132 ↗
29. 10.1038/srep1361610.1038/srep13616 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.04910.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.049 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10770410.1016/j.matdes.2019.107704 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.10395110.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103951 ↗
33. Bhargava, A.; Peng, K.; Mirzaeifar, R.; Shahab, S. In Ultrasound Actuated Shape-Memory Polymer Based Drug Delivery Containers, Active and Passive Smart Structures and IntegratedSystems XII; International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2018; 105952H.10.1117/12.2296739 ↗
34. Bhargava, A.; Peng, K.; Shahab, S. In Dynamics of Focused Ultrasound Actuated ShapeMemory Polymers, Active and Passive Smart Structures and Integrated Systems XIII; International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2019; 1096720.10.1117/12.2514362 ↗
35. Bhargava, A. Dynamics of Smart Materials in High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Field. Virginia Tech, 2020.
36. 10.1002/pola.2479410.1002/pola.24794 ↗
37. 10.1039/c0sm00236d10.1039/c0sm00236d ↗
38. 10.1088/1361-6528/abbfd210.1088/1361-6528/abbfd2 ↗
39. 10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.11.95310.1016/j.bpj.2012.11.953 ↗
41. Jewett A. · 2020
42. 10.1002/jcc.2122410.1002/jcc.21224 ↗
43. 10.1002/jcc.1021610.1002/jcc.10216 ↗
44. 10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
45. 10.1515/polyeng-2015-037010.1515/polyeng-2015-0370 ↗
46. Gooch J. W. · 2011 · 73310.1007/978-1-4419-6247-8 ↗
47. 10.1134/s001250160607008610.1134/s0012501606070086 ↗
48. 10.1002/prot.34004010610.1002/prot.340040106 ↗