journal article·2017-11-22

Synthesis and Characterization of an Injectable and Hydrophilous Expandable Bone Cement Based on Poly(methyl methacrylate)

Zhao Yang, Lei Chen, Yuxin Hao, Yuan Zang, Xiong Zhao, Lei Shi, Yang Zhang, Yafei Feng, Chao Xu, Faqi Wang, Xinli Wang, Bowen Wang, Chenxin Liu, Yufei Tang, Zixiang Wu, Wei Lei

Publisher page

Abstract

Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), the most common bone cement, has been used as a graft substitute in orthopedic surgeries such as vertebroplasty. However, an undesirable minor crack in the bone-cement interface provoked by shrinkage during polymerization and high elastic modulus of conventional PMMA bone cement dramatically increases the risk of vertebral body refracture postsurgery. Thus, herein, a hydrophilous expandable bone cement was synthesized based on a PMMA commercial cement (Mendec Spine Resin), acrylic acid (AA), and styrene (St). The two synthesized cements (PMMA-PAA, PMMA-PAA-PSt) showed excellent volumetric swelling in vitro and cohesive bone-cement contact in rabbit femur cavity defect. The elastic modulus and compressive strength of the new cements were lower than PMMA. Furthermore, the in vitro analysis indicated that the new cements had lower cytotoxicity than PMMA, including superior proliferation and lower apoptotic rates of Sprague-Dawly rat-derived osteoblasts. Western blotting for protein expression and RT-PCR analysis of osteogenesis-specific genes were conducted on SD rat-derived osteoblasts from both PMMA and new cements films; the results showed that new cements enhanced the expression of osteogenesis-specific genes. Scanning electron microscopy demonstrated improved morphology and attachment of osteoblast on new cement discs compared to the PMMA discs. Additionally, the histological morphologies of the bone-cement interface from the rabbit medial femoral condyle cavity defect model revealed direct and cohesive contact with the bone in the new cement groups in contrast to a minor crack in the PMMA cement group. The sign of a new bone growing into the cement has been found in the new cements after 12 weeks, thereby indicating the osteogenic capacity in vivo. In conclusion, the synthesized hydrophilous expandable bone cements based on PMMA and poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) are promising candidates for vertebroplasty.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Orthopaedics, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, No. 17 Changle Xi Road, Xi’an, Shaanxi province 710032, P.R. China

School of Materials Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, No. 5 Jinhua South Road, Xi’an, Shaanxi province 710048, P.R. China

State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences Beijing, Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, 102206, P.R. China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Shaanxi Province

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Kühn K. D. · 201310.1007/978-3-642-41536-4 ↗
2. Charnley J. · Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery-British Volume · 1960 · 42 · 2810.1302/0301-620X.42B1.28 ↗
3. 10.1097/00007632-200107150-0000910.1097/00007632-200107150-00009 ↗
4. 10.1055/s-2006-94799410.1055/s-2006-947994 ↗
5. 10.1007/s00586-011-2119-510.1007/s00586-011-2119-5 ↗
6. 10.3109/1745367990899779910.3109/17453679908997799 ↗
7. 10.2106/00004623-197557030-0001710.2106/00004623-197557030-00017 ↗
8. 10.1002/1097-4636(200010)52:1<210::AID-JBM27>3.0.CO;2-R10.1002/1097-4636(200010)52:1<210::AID-JBM27>3.0.CO;2-R ↗
9. 10.1302/0301-620X.88B1.1660010.1302/0301-620X.88B1.16600 ↗
10. 10.2174/187432500130701025010.2174/1874325001307010250 ↗
11. 10.1002/jbm.82019050810.1002/jbm.820190508 ↗
12. 10.1177/160240022310.1177/1602400223 ↗
13. Race A. · J. Bone Joint Surg. · 2004 · 86 · 910.2106/00004623-200401000-00003 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.00910.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.009 ↗
15. 10.3109/1745367020917803710.3109/17453670209178037 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.10.02010.1016/j.spinee.2006.10.020 ↗
17. 10.1097/01.BRS.0000061987.71624.1710.1097/01.BRS.0000061987.71624.17 ↗
18. Lee C. · 2005 · 6010.1007/3-540-28924-0_6 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00586-002-0512-910.1007/s00586-002-0512-9 ↗
20. 10.1097/01.BRS.0000061987.71624.1710.1097/01.BRS.0000061987.71624.17 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.10.02010.1016/j.spinee.2006.10.020 ↗
22. 10.1007/s00586-007-0564-y10.1007/s00586-007-0564-y ↗
23. 10.1155/2016/790156210.1155/2016/7901562 ↗
24. 10.1002/jbm.b.3104410.1002/jbm.b.31044 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.01.02910.1016/j.jconrel.2011.01.029 ↗
26. 10.12659/MSM.89384510.12659/MSM.893845 ↗
27. 10.1080/21592535.2015.113339410.1080/21592535.2015.1133394 ↗
28. 10.1002/app.2323910.1002/app.23239 ↗
29. 10.1002/jor.110018032410.1002/jor.1100180324 ↗
30. 10.1080/09205063.2015.103459810.1080/09205063.2015.1034598 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00340-510.1016/S0142-9612(03)00340-5 ↗
32. 10.1155/2014/15407110.1155/2014/154071 ↗
33. 10.1038/srep4294810.1038/srep42948 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.02110.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.021 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.04.01110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.04.011 ↗
36. 10.1038/ncomms847310.1038/ncomms8473 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017 ↗
38. 10.1371/journal.pone.014066910.1371/journal.pone.0140669 ↗
39. 10.1007/978-1-61779-415-5_310.1007/978-1-61779-415-5_3 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.12.02410.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.12.024 ↗
41. 10.1302/0301-620X.88B1.1660010.1302/0301-620X.88B1.16600 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.02.01210.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.02.012 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.05510.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.055 ↗
44. American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) · 13
45. 10.1007/s10856-007-3042-510.1007/s10856-007-3042-5 ↗
46. 10.1002/mabi.20130038410.1002/mabi.201300384 ↗
47. 10.1177/096032711665000710.1177/0960327116650007 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.01310.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.013 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.11.01210.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.11.012 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.11.02410.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.11.024 ↗